Originally posted by Fishy
Canada is to the north of the US.
OH oh oh....and also south of the US.....LOOK AT YOUR MAP AGAIN....
Southern Ontario is south of Detroit.. 😄
So we always have to throw dems. and Reps...into the debates?????
the fact is that .....do you want to live with them, or not in your ever growing neighborhood jails????.
Sooooooooooooo how many jails would be appropriate?????...I'm just sick on how many are near me.....
Originally posted by Saratn
well, I am against abortion, because of the child deserves to live and what not, but it is the mother's body, and she can do what she wants. it should still remain legal, because the baby isn't exactly born yet...and wouldn't be murder.
Liberal: *pats self on back* Yay! I contributed to freedom! A woman's body is her own choice to make what is done with it! Yay!
Conservative: I'm not fully sastified, but atleast I don't have the blood on my hands.. I think I'll enjoy this tax cut by getting me a beer, hurray for democracy!
Originally posted by Saratn
well, I am against abortion, because of the child deserves to live and what not, but it is the mother's body, and she can do what she wants. it should still remain legal, because the baby isn't exactly born yet...and wouldn't be murder.
Well then you're for abortion, and that's ok. Don't be scared to be for something that's right.
(It's not a child either, but that's been done in the abortion thread.)
-AC
It would be so much better for the economy to ignore whiney pinkos..
One bullet to the head, how hard is that? How cheap? They should create a threat level, depending on your level, you'll either be executed if found guilty, senteced to prison, or fined.
Threat level 1: A fine.
Level 2-3: Hefty fine.
4-5: Prison.
6-7: Longtime in prison.
8-9: Inidivudual judge descison, but death penalty is possible.
10+: Death, no questions asked.
Then, with all the extra money saved on not having to feed level 9-10 threats, we could actually have money to spend on our expensive fuel, shop for things we like, and help fund more IMPORANT things, SpellJammer would rather his money be going to burned children then feeding Charles Manson..
Originally posted by Spelljammer
It would be so much better for the economy to ignore whiney pinkos..One bullet to the head, how hard is that? How cheap? They should create a threat level, depending on your level, you'll either be executed if found guilty, senteced to prison, or fined.
Threat level 1: A fine.
Level 2-3: Hefty fine.
4-5: Prison.
6-7: Longtime in prison.
8-9: Inidivudual judge descison, but death penalty is possible.
10+: Death, no questions asked.Then, with all the extra money saved on not having to feed level 9-10 threats, we could actually have money to spend on our expensive fuel, shop for things we like, and help fund more IMPORANT things, SpellJammer would rather his money be going to burned children then feeding Charles Manson..
Originally posted by yerssot
in which case the executor should be considered threat level 10+ too, he can kill people who even years/decades later are proven to be innocent
Of course, he's not killing known innocent people, only people who have been found guilty and seen as unsafe to keep alive. If mistakes are made and innocent people are killed then it's the fault of the court system, not the executioner.
Originally posted by yerssot
but he still killed innocents, making him a murderer
Yes, but not a direct threat to society, which is what spelljammers little threat level is about. Plus he's not knowingly murdering innocent people out on the street, nor in his chamber, it's done because of a fallacious court system.
Any reasonable person would be able to see a ridiculous difference between an executioner and a serial killer. Hopefully, you can.
Originally posted by BackFire
Yes, but not a direct threat to society, which is what spelljammers little threat level is about. Plus he's not knowingly murdering innocent people out on the street, nor in his chamber, it's done because of a fallacious court system.Any reasonable person would be able to see a ridiculous difference between an executioner and a serial killer. Hopefully, you can.
the problem is, if you include the deathpenalty, you will always kill people that later are found to be innocent. If people value truth and life that low, you can just as well slaughter people for less severe reasons already
Originally posted by yerssot
Well, as you should know by now, I'm unreasonablethe problem is, if you include the deathpenalty, you will always kill people that later are found to be innocent. If people value truth and life that low, you can just as well slaughter people for less severe reasons already
And if you don't include the death penalty, then there are going to be time when some of those murderers will break out of prison and kill innocent people while they're out. If these people are dead, their threat is completely negated.
Either way, innocent people will die. It's just a matter of how they die.
that's why you have maximum secured prisons... you make sure that those that are in for a heavy crime can't get out.
But when you kill them, they have no chance to ever get free. In prison they have at least one thing that is important to them: hope.
Shooting them down just because they are accused of something bad, is something that has been done in what the people call "the dark ages", people have fought long and hard to get away form this