Superman vs. Hulk

Originally posted by Dinalfos
Most of that is just the renting of a Superman fanboy who knows nothing about Hulk.

He's right, though, that Superman is an overpowered moron written for the "OMG, Supers is teh kewlestest heroe in teh universe!!1!"- crowd. If Superman went all out, he would most certainly defeat the Hulk in some way. Just not with pure strength.

I never said he would defeat Hulk with pure strength. I simply was going by feats of both of them. I also stated that Superman was WAY too damn versatile for Hulk. You can call it ranting of a Superman fanboy, but it's simply logic. I could just as easily label you with the title of "Hulk fanboy." 😉

Everybody needs to accept the fact that, without CIS, Supes wins.

Originally posted by badabing
Everybody needs to accept the fact that, without CIS, Supes wins.

And easily I'd like to add. 😉

I have already stated that he probably can't defeat Superman if Supes used his powers in an intelligent way. But stuff like this is idiotic:

It is actually funny.

"This is how Superman can lose (note: He has to do all of them for it to work):

1) He (Superman) decides to provoke the Hulk for a considerable period of time so as to let the Hulk's anger reach a crescendo
2) He decides to not fly.
3) Decides to not use any of his speed
4) Decides not to use any of his superior sensory perceptions (which could make him actually fight the Hulk blindfolded, and win, since he could keep tabs on the Green One easily using anything ranging from superhearing to feeling air-pressure shunts)
5) Decides not to use any of his offensive array of options
6) Decides to just stand there and let the Hulk pound on him
7) Decides to operate at a level of intellect that is equal to that of the Hulk (i.e he decides to act as stupid as the Hulk is when he is really mad"

A lot of this is only telling half of the story or just plain fanboy babble.

Originally posted by Dinalfos
I have already stated that he probably can't defeat Superman if Supes used his powers in an intelligent way. But stuff like this is idiotic:

It is actually funny.

"This is how Superman can lose (note: He has to do all of them for it to work):

1) He (Superman) decides to provoke the Hulk for a considerable period of time so as to let the Hulk's anger reach a crescendo
2) He decides to not fly.
3) Decides to not use any of his speed
4) Decides not to use any of his superior sensory perceptions (which could make him actually fight the Hulk blindfolded, and win, since he could keep tabs on the Green One easily using anything ranging from superhearing to feeling air-pressure shunts)
5) Decides not to use any of his offensive array of options
6) Decides to just stand there and let the Hulk pound on him
7) Decides to operate at a level of intellect that is equal to that of the Hulk (i.e he decides to act as stupid as the Hulk is when he is really mad"

A lot of this is only telling half of the story or just plain fanboy babble.

Spetznaz is absolutely NOT a fanboy and doesn't just go on babbling. If you're lucky, you'll be HALF the debator he his. He was just exagerating those points because he knows just like everyone else, that this fight is going to go to Superman 10/10. 😉

Now you sound like a fanboy 😉

Pretty sure that Batdude is right with what he's saying.

Superman, easily.

Speed kills.

Why hasn't this thread been closed? 2,000+ posts beating a dead horse.

Originally posted by Dinalfos
Now you sound like a fanboy 😉

I'm not a fanboy at all. It's just that unlike some, I use logic in my posts. So don't just go throwing the term "fanboy" around just because you don't agree with somebody. It's not cool.

Originally posted by Dayscribe
Pretty sure that Batdude is right with what he's saying.

Thanks! 😉

Originally posted by illadelph12
Superman, easily.

Speed kills.

Why hasn't this thread been closed? 2,000+ posts beating a dead horse.

😆 ✅

Well, I don't care about "cool". A lot of the pro-Superman posts in this thread hold water, but it's the general tone that irks me. Some of you guys come across a rabid anti-Hulksters.

Originally posted by illadelph12
Superman, easily.

Speed kills.

Why hasn't this thread been closed? 2,000+ posts beating a dead horse.

Cosign.

Also, no problem, Batdude. I'm not really a fan of either. I like the animated versions of the characters better.

Originally posted by S.S
Hulk still wins 10/10..........

Superman could also lose if he had amnesia or if Rhino was on his team.

Originally posted by Dinalfos
Well, I don't care about "cool". A lot of the pro-Superman posts in this thread hold water, but it's the general tone that irks me. Some of you guys come across a rabid anti-Hulksters.

I don't hate Hulk. I'm not going to go and say he'll lose to Shocker. However, facts are facts, man.

Originally posted by Dinalfos
Well, I don't care about "cool". A lot of the pro-Superman posts in this thread hold water, but it's the general tone that irks me. Some of you guys come across a rabid anti-Hulksters.

I'm not "Anti-Hulk" at all. ❌ There is just no conceivable way for Hulk to win.

Originally posted by Validus
You convinced me. Wonderful points all around. It was the "still" part that sealed the deal. 💃

Originally posted by S.S
What can I say I'm a master debater and Hulks just that strong remember he was holding a mountain........... 😎and it only takes him 2 whole issues to heal from lava..........

😆 😂 🤣 💃

There is, actually. But the odds are in Superman's favour. A fight like the one we saw in the 1996 and 1999 cross over(the other one from 1981 or so is so bad it doesn't even deserve to be mentioned) isn't entirely unlikely in terms of set up and rules. The outcome may differ, though.