K, rather than fight this guy with blind faith and happy little recitations of personal beliefs (which are fine, but won't get through) let's go scientific...
I don't entirely disagree with you Mr. Vengeance, as I don't believe in heaven/hell, nor am I a Christian. But let's look at the god argument. And in the following ideas, by the idea of "God" I simply mean a higher intelligence, or creator...not necesarily a God in the Biblical sense.
....
We've been able to calculate the approximate mass of the universe and in doing so figure out exactly how powerful the 'big bang' had to be to create our universe. Modern physics will tell us that matter is simply condensed energy. Under this principle, if the big bang had been less powerful by 0.00000...1 (60 zeros before the 1) percent, there wouldn't have been enough outward exertion and the universe, with all its mass, would have collapsed back in on itself. Conversely, if it had been more powerful by the same ludicrously small decimal, the bang would have been too powerful, and the energy would have never slowed enough to form the matter of the universe.
Such a finely tuned cosmic calculation blatently suggests some sort of intelligent design, or God if you will.
Similarly, any research into the probability of life ocurring as it exists on our planet has come up with such staggeringly impropable chances that we should exist, that modern scientists believe, just as mch as priests anymore, that we were created by intelligent design. The only difference is the scientists don't ascribe a belief system to that creator like the religios do...they simply acknowledge that one exists.
I can produce the sources from which I got this data (I have already done so on this forum mroe than once). If you're interested, please feel free to ask.