No that honor would go to the guy with the mask on below my user name.Elektra was just too much of an adult film for you to enjoy unlike those kiddie burton batman flicks and the guy below my user name.The majority of movie goers enjoy watching crap and thats why those comicbook movies unlike Elektra made so much money at the box office.
Originally posted by NoFate007
If Burton had directed Begins, we would've had Batman '89 again. We'd be calling this Batman '05.I don't think it'd be bad...cause I love '89...however I think Nolan was the perfect choice for it.
The only thing I'd have liked to carry over was the main theme, you gotta love Elfman's theme.
the elfman theme wouldnt fit in with batman begins' style
Originally posted by Mr Parker
No that honor would go to the guy with the mask on below my user name.Elektra was just too much of an adult film for you to enjoy unlike those kiddie burton batman flicks and the guy below my user name.The majority of movie goers enjoy watching crap and thats why those comicbook movies unlike Elektra made so much money at the box office.
Dude, Elektra blew. Are you saying Elektra was better than Batman '89?
if so then you must be out of your gourd, dude. I'd rather watch Halle's Catwoman 10 times in a row than to have to sit through Elektra for 7 seconds with Jennifer Garner watching it with me in my house.. I'd pay not to see Elektra. An adult film? I happen to like adult films. (especially hardcore ones, hehe) but i digress. You're saying I dont enjoy adult films, I liked Batman Begins. so stop assuming. You think just because someone likes Batman '89 that there not real fans. Get over yourself, dude.
get over it. Majority rules. Batman '89 rocked & still does. I'd watch it again definitely. And screw Clooney and Kilmer as the Dark Knight..
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Dude, Elektra blew. Are you saying Elektra was better than Batman '89?if so then you must be out of your gourd, dude. I'd rather watch Halle's Catwoman 10 times in a row than to have to sit through Elektra for 7 seconds with Jennifer Garner watching it with me in my house.. I'd pay not to see Elektra. An adult film? I happen to like adult films. (especially hardcore ones, hehe) but i digress. You're saying I dont enjoy adult films, I liked Batman Begins. so stop assuming. You think just because someone likes Batman '89 that there not real fans. Get over yourself, dude.
get over it. Majority rules. Batman '89 rocked & still does. I'd watch it again definitely. And screw Clooney and Kilmer as the Dark Knight..
yep,the ONLY good thing about batman 89 is Danny Elfmans music and the scenes with kim basinger in them. 😄 sorry but a batman movie where all they do is just stand around and talk for the first hour in a half is boring as hell,thats why I will take Elecktra and batman forever any day of the year over those crapfest burton batman flicks .yep sorry the truth hurts that your not a true fan for accepting those crapfest burton batman movies. 😛 majority dose not rule because as I said,the majority of moviegoers only likes watching crap instead of quality movies like elektra.No screw clooney and keaton as the dark knight. Im done with ya.
I think that these kind of threads are really dumb because burton directed batman and batman returns and nolan directed batman begins. That is what we have, to think what coud be if burton directed batman begins or stuff like that is kinda boring and dumb.
But thanks to god that chris nolan directed batman begins and not tim burton or joel schumacher , who are two talented directors but with a wrong concept of the character, as they prooved in their terrible movies.
Originally posted by Silverstein
people only like burtons batman because it was the first batman movie. People seem to have an attraction for the original, like the simpsons over the family guy: considering family guy is more funnier and better
That is so true,I have seen many batman fans post the absurd logic over the years at sites saying that keaton was the best batman because he was the first and original one.seriously I have seen that posted many times over the years,thats the kind of logic they sprout off. 😆 trying to reason with them that if a guy doesnt even come close to looking the role,then he brings no credibility to the part is like talking to wall with these keaton burton fans who refuse to take the blinders off and see how poor burtons films really are. 🙄
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
well, there were a few things in "Batman Begins" that were unrealistic like some of the "Bat-tank's" capabilities,I don't know of any cars, or tanks in this case, that have stealth mode that visibly shields itself from multiple and closeby cop cars in hot persuit, lol
Or his cape and it's capabilities.
I don't know of any handgliders that tighten up after being as loose as a wet towel and allow you to glide in places that don't even hold strong air current because, to me, Batman was flying in that scene where he flew over Gotham above the chaos when people looked up to him and saw fire coming out his eyes and mouth. He was up there for a while. with no air currents. lol that wasn't gliding.
I got the 2-disc set a few days ago and they mention in one of the special features that the memory cloth is something the army is experimenting on right now so its not that far fetched.
IMO Tim burton is overrated. The only reason people liked his batman so much is because the others were just so god awful until of course Batman Begins.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
That is so true,I have seen many batman fans post the absurd logic over the years at sites saying that keaton was the best batman because he was the first and original one.seriously I have seen that posted many times over the years,thats the kind of logic they sprout off. 😆 trying to reason with them that if a guy doesnt even come close to looking the role,then he brings no credibility to the part is like talking to wall with these keaton burton fans who refuse to take the blinders off and see how poor burtons films really are. 🙄
Totally agree with you. Personally I'd like to see how keaton would be as the Joker.
Or maybe because it was the 19th greatest movie of all time, bitches.
http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/records/inflation.html
He's like I met alot of crackers batman haters. Congratulations, you met alot of crackers batman haters. Good for you, cracker.
Originally posted by sevenman
Or maybe because it was the 19th greatest movie of all time, bitches.http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/records/inflation.html
He's like I met alot of crackers batman haters. Congratulations, you met alot of crackers batman haters. Good for you, cracker.
😑
Originally posted by Hegemon875
Totally agree with you. Personally I'd like to see how keaton would be as the Joker.
FINALLY!!! someone who knows something about logic and common sense. 💃 People just want to believe the first one was the best because it was the original.I have seen many posts over the years of that old tiresome nonsense that if its not Burtons batman movies are great and schuamchers are horrible,its the other tiresome-The first one was great,the rest of them sucked.they just dont get it that they all sucked and were not at all believeable like Begins was.They were ALL horribly casted unlike Batman Begins.I hate the first two more so than Batman forever,the one of the four I thought was halfway decent because Kilmer at least looked like bruce wayne and at least acted like him-unlike keaton,it had lots more action in it unlike those incredibly boring burton films,the batcave tunnel kilmer went through to get to the cave was awesome,the batplane flying through the cave was amazing,ditto for the batboat.Plus KIlmers batman did not look like a wuss in a fight like Keatons batman did in the first film.Batman Forever COULD have been a magical movie unlike the first two,but just like the first two batman movies were ruined with the horrible casting choice of keaton,Schumacher ruined batman forever with the horrible casting choice of Chris O'donnel as robin. 😠 the guy not only sucked as an actor,he was wayyyyy too old to be adopted,that was not at all believeable.I mean him and kilmer looked the same age for god sakes.Thank god for nolan.He realised the miatakes that all the other batman films made and did not make those same mistakes and unlike the other four films,made great casting decisions.