SpellJammer is NOT a Republican!

Started by Coldfire5 pages

Originally posted by Hecatomb
I'd be a cheerleader, but my ass would eat the skirt..

omg 😂

Lemme guess, Hecatomb = SpellJammer

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Lemme guess, Hecatomb = SpellJammer

No way 😱 😐

Right, so why does Spelljammer address himself in the third person?

Originally posted by Arachnoidfreak
Right, so why does Spelljammer address himself in the third person?

Cuz he feels like it, I guess

Originally posted by Arachnoidfreak
Right, so why does Spelljammer address himself in the third person?

whats it matter?

Originally posted by Raven Guardia
whats it matter?

Exactly

Often addressing oneself in the third person is a sign of insecurity. It is as though that through repeating one's name and attaching it to each thought and emotion expressed that it would be more validated in the eyes of others.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Often addressing oneself in the third person is a sign of insecurity. It is as though that through repeating one's name and attaching it to each thought and emotion expressed that it would be more validated in the eyes of others.

Thankyou Dr. Phil.. 🙄

Originally posted by Hecatomb
Thankyou Dr. Phil.. 🙄

That smartass answer gives me the feeling I may have hit a little too close to home.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
That smartass answer gives me the feeling I may have hit a little too close to home.

Nope, the smartass answer just makes you a smartass. ✅

Hit a little further 🥷

Originally posted by Hecatomb
Nope, the smartass answer just makes you a smartass. ✅

Heh, that reminds me of a sig I need to make...

Originally posted by Lana
Marriage existed before Catholicism did.

Uh.... Oh my god....

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Sorgo, I wasn't really referring to your opinion of gay marriage. I'm referring to you being a "pure strain" catholic...whatever the hell that means, I assume it's something lke hardcore...who believes in the bible, absolutely. Then, later in your post...you say you believe in evolution...that makes no sense. Those are two points of view that totally contradict each other

From a certain point of view, yes they would collide. But some of my opinions about the Growth of Life contradict my believes to an extent, but I have a Theory that keeps my train on it's tracks.

What is this theory that keeps evolution from contradicting pretty much every line in the Genesis?