On Homosexuality & Religion [Merged]

Originally posted by cking
what about you are you respectful of people?

I never slander, and if I do by accident or blunder, I apologize for it.

me too and I don't cuss at all.

Originally posted by cking
me too and I don't cuss at all.

You are not off the hook with this. I am disappointed in you.

for what?

only sin in this is consider being gay a sin

The fact that you think its alright, doesnt make it so. Just as the fact that somebody thinks it is wrong, doesnt make it so.

Its an opinion and its everyones to have. The act is an unnatural one, that much is clear. I say this based on the fact that sexual reproductive organs are there primilarily for continuation of the species. Which of course is impossible with two males or females. But if thats what they like, so be it.

if God says it is wrong it is wrong, because it is against his will of a marriage between a man and a woman.

Here, you claim to be a respectful person:

Originally posted by cking
I am respectful, I respect everyone and my parents.

This post however, is less than respectful:

Originally posted by cking
nope, read genesis, you then will understand homos were created. ha ha ha

And in case you did not realize you were being disrespectful, someone pointed it out for you:

Originally posted by Evanescence
i think i speak for all homosexuals that we do not like to be called homos. please treat us with at least some repsect.

homo is short for homosexuals I was not trying to hurt anyone, I just didn't want to write all of it because I was too lazy to. I was too impatient with my writings sometimes.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Here, you claim to be a respectful person:

This post however, is less than respectful:

And in case you did not realize you were being disrespectful, someone pointed it out for you:

If we keep responding to this post, do you think cking will get it?

Originally posted by clickclick
The fact that you think its alright, doesnt make it so. Just as the fact that somebody thinks it is wrong, doesnt make it so.

Its an opinion and its everyones to have. The act is an unnatural one, that much is clear. I say this based on the fact that sexual reproductive organs are there primilarily for continuation of the species. Which of course is impossible with two males or females. But if thats what they like, so be it.

It is so unnatural that it occurs in every sexually reproducing organism, the only exception being bacteria, and has been documented in over 450 species of animals in the wild.

Originally posted by cking
homo is short for homosexuals I was not trying to hurt anyone, I just didn't want to write all of it because I was too lazy to. I was too impatient with my writings sometimes.

Names of social groups derived from adjectives are regarded as offensive when used as a noun to refer to particular individuals, e.g. "There were two blacks on the panel," or "there were two homos on the panel," etc.

yep, so is the word gay

Originally posted by cking
yep, so is the word gay

NO, you are wrong here, just apologize. But I think it may be too late.

alright I will apologize even through I still don't get it.

I'm sorry OK, despite I'm confused from all this.

Originally posted by cking
I'm sorry OK, despite I'm confused from all this.

Good!

Now lets see if you are forgiven.

forgive me and then I will forgive you of any wrong doing in the future this is a teaching from Jesus.

It is so unnatural that it occurs in every sexually reproducing organism, the only exception being bacteria, and has been documented in over 450 species of animals in the wild.

And yet none use their reproductive organs for their main purpose of being there. If everybody was a homosexual, all non asexual species die off. If that was natural, how could that be the case? While if everyone was heterosexual, theyd continue to reproduce.

Be honest with yourself man.

Im not attacking anyone here, im stating an unequivocal fact.

Originally posted by clickclick
And yet none use their reproductive organs for their main purpose of being there. If everybody was a homosexual, all non asexual species die off. If that was natural, how could that be the case? While if everyone was heterosexual, theyd continue to reproduce.

Be honest with yourself man.

Im not attacking anyone here, im stating an unequivocal fact.

As I have said before, population control. In any given population there is a small percentage of homosexual activity, as the population grows so does this percentage. There is one thing that will kill off a population faster than no new generation; that is, starvation. The percentage of homosexual activity is linked to the population, so as the percentage goes up, the population goes down and so to does the percentage of homosexual activity. People who are gay are born that way!

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
As I have said before, population control. In any given population there is a small percentage of homosexual activity, as the population grows so does this percentage. There is one thing that will kill off a population faster than no new generation; that is, starvation. The percentage of homosexual activity is linked to the population, so as the percentage goes up, the population goes down and so to does the percentage of homosexual activity. [B]People who are gay are born that way! [/B]

I never heard of this study before, but that does only shows us that homosexuality is proporcional to population, but not necessarily that proporcionality should exist to control the rat population. Many other things grows as the population grows, like crime, number of car accidents, number of deaths, etc. I think that is probably a hypothesis, not a scientifical fact. Think of this... even if its needed a natural way to control population, why by homosexuality, why not some rats devouring the others, or assexuality. Of course your point of view is still a possibility. So... yea... I think its still possible for homosexuality to be from nature.