Female Teachers Accused Of Sex With Girls

Started by whobdamandog3 pages

Female Teachers Accused Of Sex With Girls

Female teachers accused of molesting female students

Alleged Molester 1: Amy Lilley

A high school teacher in Citrus County is the second Florida woman in two days accused of having a lesbian relationship with a student.

A Citrus County high school teacher and former coach has been accused of having a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old female student, authorities said.

Alleged Molester 2: Jaime Wallace

Amy Gail Lilley, 36, was charged with one count of lewd and lascivious battery on a child stemming from her alleged relationship with a 15-year-old girl.

Lilley was released from Citrus County Jail on Wednesday morning after posting $5,000 bail

The day before Lilley's arrest Tuesday, a female Tampa teacher and girls basketball coach, Jaymee Lane Wallace, 28, was charged with having an 18-month relationship with a female student.

Coach Jaime Wallace is accused of having a lesbian love affair with one of her students.

Lilley's alleged victim told school officials Monday that she and the teacher were in love and had sex several times since September, a sheriff's office report said.

Lilley first denied there was a sexual relationship, then admitted it, the report said.

The report said she lives in Crystal River, but her telephone number has been disconnected. Information about her legal representation was not immediately available.

Citrus County school officials said Lilley has been put on paid administrative leave pending completion of the sheriff's investigation.

Lilley's personnel file shows she graduated from Lecanto High in 1987 and went to work there as a business education teacher in 1993. She also coached girls' softball at the school.

Both Chicks look kind of creepy to me..anyway..Discuss.

Must....take......subject....seriously....

ERROR.ERROR.ERRRRROORRR.

😂

What makes this crime so serious and sickening is that they are ugly... sorry but they are actually scary!

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
What makes this crime so serious and sickening is that they are ugly... sorry but they are actually scary!

Yep, neither is the pick of the litter. You have to be real sick woman if you can't at least get a teenage boy to sleep with you. I'm betting both of these broads were only able to bag really really fat chicks. No hot chick would cross the line with these dogs.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Yep, neither is the pick of the litter. You have to be real sick woman if you can't at least get a teenage boy to sleep with you. I'm betting both of these broads were only able to bag really really fat chicks. No hot chick would cross the line with these dogs.

😆😆

The 15yr old girls are probably worse then them! they are probably happy to get some attention!

Originally posted by Draco69
Must....take......subject....seriously....

ERROR.ERROR.ERRRRROORRR.

😂

What this man said.

-AC

No teacher should have there name disclosed unless they are convicted

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
What makes this crime so serious and sickening is that they are ugly... sorry but they are actually scary!
I know...

Does anyone know if a video of the alleged molestation is available? I'd like to watch it to see if they are guilty or not.

Originally posted by Mr _Whirlysplat
No teacher should have there name disclosed unless they are convicted

technically since they are over the age of 18 the press is allowed to release it. They will not be allowed to release the names of the victims unless the parents give the ok. But its freedom of information. any time anyone gets arrested it appears in the police log of the newspapers, and it says the crime they were arrested, their name, age, and the city/town their from.

Originally posted by Curl_Up&Dye
technically since they are over the age of 18 the press is allowed to release it. They will not be allowed to release the names of the victims unless the parents give the ok. But its freedom of information. any time anyone gets arrested it appears in the police log of the newspapers, and it says the crime they were arrested, their name, age, and the city/town their from.

At the moment in the UK teaching unions are fighting for this to not happen because so many "made up" allegations are proven to be "made up". It simply should not happen.

Originally posted by Mr _Whirlysplat
At the moment in the UK teaching unions are fighting for this to not happen because so many "made up" allegations are proven to be "made up". It simply should not happen.

I agree with you 110% that allegations should not be 'made up' just for the sake of making things up. However, freedom of information and freedom of the press usually over rule everything. However, i think they could compromise. Whatever amount of news coverage they print or air about an allegation, if the allegations prove to be wrong, they should have to print or air the same amount of coverage of their innocence

Originally posted by Curl_Up&Dye
I agree with you 110% that allegations should not be 'made up' just for the sake of making things up. However, freedom of information and freedom of the press usually over rule everything. However, i think they could compromise. Whatever amount of news coverage they print or air about an allegation, if the allegations prove to be wrong, they should have to print or air the same amount of coverage of their innocence

In the UK the tabloids do not and teachers careers are often destroyed a great deal of progress in this has been made and more and more Magistrates are putting banning orders on release of teachers names in the UK until after the outcome of the trial.

Obviously the cases are judged in high court but magistrates set bail conditions etc. until initial hearings and Judges do not usually change these.

Originally posted by Mr _Whirlysplat
In the UK the tabloids do not and teachers careers are often destroyed a great deal of progress in this has been made and more and more Magistrates are putting banning orders on release of teachers names in the UK until after the outcome of the trial.

Obviously the cases are judged in high court but magistrates set bail conditions etc. until initial hearings and Judges do not usually change these.

the US needs to start doing something like that, because there have been more than a few cases where allegations were made out of revenge for like bad grades. But honestly, people talk no matter what, so even if the names arent released, everyone in the area is going to know about it anyways

Originally posted by Curl_Up&Dye
the US needs to start doing something like that, because there have been more than a few cases where allegations were made out of revenge for like bad grades. But honestly, people talk no matter what, so even if the names arent released, everyone in the area is going to know about it anyways

Agreed, teachers, social workers, doctors etc are easy targets. Yes everyone in the area but not nationally. People can relocate and put things behind them this way.

Originally posted by Mr _Whirlysplat
Agreed, teachers, social workers, doctors etc are easy targets. Yes everyone in the area but not nationally. People can relocate and put things behind them this way.

yeah thats true. but ALL people are going to want that right, not just the easy targets. Rapists, child molesters, murders, drug dealers, everyone is going to want the right to not have their case in the papers, even though many times these people are aquitted on charges they should have been found guilty of. Then these people can relocate and continue doing what they have been doing

hmmm.... the old double edged sword there whirly....

Originally posted by Curl_Up&Dye
yeah thats true. but ALL people are going to want that right, not just the easy targets. Rapists, child molesters, murders, drug dealers, everyone is going to want the right to not have their case in the papers, even though many times these people are aquitted on charges they should have been found guilty of. Then these people can relocate and continue doing what they have been doing

Well the Unions have made head way as I say and I think the Magistrates at present are doing a good job on it. Actually I think with these crimes if someone is found not guilty they deserve to remain anonymous, but thats another argument.

heres a little on it its out of date though 🙁

http://society.guardian.co.uk/children/story/0,1074,1192316,00.html

Its about teachers sueing over wrongful allegations

I agree to a point with you Whirly, however, I believe that when one commits a crime..they have to accept the fact that their is going to be some social stigma with the crime that they've commited.

Child molestation is a heinous offense, and I truly feel sorry for those who are wrongly accused of it..however..one who is actually found guilty of said crime..should definately be stringently monitored, even after they've served a sentence for said crime.

The sexual drive is a difficult thing to control, and many of the individuals who commit these crimes would definately do it again if given the opportunity to do so.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
I agree to a point with you Whirly, however, I believe that when one commits a crime..they have to accept the fact that their is going to be some social stigma with the crime that they've commited.

Child molestation is a heinous offense, and I truly feel sorry for those who are wrongly accused of it..however..one who is actually found guilty of said crime..should definately be stringently monitored, even after they've served a sentence for said crime.

The sexual drive is a difficult thing to control, and many of the individuals who commit these crimes would definately do it again if given the opportunity to do so.

I think we agree totally actually, but the stigma should not affect those found not guilty.