Re: Re: Re: What If Science Proved Your Belief Wrong.
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Care to back that up by providing me with multiple peer-reviewed articles published in reputable scientific journals?
If the evidences presented held against scrutiny and were proven unequivocably then I'd accept the new theory, however it would still be subject to any evidence presented subsequently. It would however have no substantive impact on my life whatsoever.
Take the E. Coli bacterial flagellum as example. It is a irreducibly complex system, composed of multiple parts including a stator, rotor, drive shaft, U-joint and propellar. The microscopic parts come in focus when magnified 50,000 times with a electron micrograph. All of these parts are necessary for the system to function. Every individual part is integral. If you remove any one part the system will fail to function. There is absolute no naturalistic, gradual evolutionary explanation for this bacterial flagellum. (Michael Behe, Darwin's Black Box, 1996)
David M Raup, an evolutionist freely admits, "in the years after after Darwin, his advocates hoped to find predictable progressions. In general these have not been found- yet the optimism died hard and some pure fantasy has crept into textbooks." (Evolution and the Fossil Record, Science, vol 213, July 1981. There has been fraudulant evidences in favor of evolution submitted into textbooks despite their exposure as blatant deceptions. Ernst Heackle's work is example. He was a German embryologist who altered drawings of animal and human embryo's making them almost identical to prove evolution between the species and to promote evolution. In 1874 his drawings were exposed as frauds by Wilhelm His, a renowened embryologist.Haeckel was convicted of fraud yet his fruadulant drawings are still in textbooks today. The DNA molecule is another example of intelligent design, the incredible micro, digital, error-correcting, redundant, self duplicating information storage and retrieval sysytem with it own coherent language convention. Lets look at the basic formula : Creation states that matter + energy + information = incredibly complex life. Evolution states that matter + energy+ random change = incredibly complex life. We do not need scientific proof of a creator, it is evident in the creation around us.