The 2,000,000th post game

Started by bluewaterrider52,234 pages

Son of the Black Stallion

[WhiteElo "1700"]
[BlackElo "1875"]
[PlyCount "30"]

1. e4 {[%emt 0:0:10]} Nf6 {[%emt 0:0:5]} 2. e5 {[%emt 0:0:5]} Nd5 {[%emt 0:0:4]} 3. c4 {[%emt 0:0:3]} Nb4 {[%emt 0:0:6]} 4. f4 {[%emt 0:0:1]} N8a6 {[%emt 0:0:19]} 5. a3 {[%emt 0:0:3]} Nc6 {[%emt 0:0:4]} 6. b4 {[%emt 0:0:8]} Nd4 {[%emt 0:0:7]} 7. Bb2 {[%emt 0:0:7]} Nf5 {[%emt 0:0:5]} 8. Bd3 {[%emt 0:0:7]} Nh4 {[%emt 0:0:11]} 9. Nf3 {[%emt 0:0:10]} Nxg2+ {[%emt 0:0:4]} 10. Kf2 {[%emt 0:0:22]} Nxf4 {[%emt 0:0:3]} 11. Qc2 {[%emt 0:0:9]} e6 {[%emt 0:0:42]} 12. Bxh7 {[%emt 0:0:4]} g6 {[%emt 0:0:20]} 13. Bxg6 {[%emt 0:0:16]} Nxg6 {[%emt 0:0:8]} 14. Rg1 {[%emt 0:0:3]} Nf4 {[%emt 0:0:16]} 15. Ke3 {[%emt 0:0:14]} Bh6 {[%emt 0:0:9]} 0-1

View of material in the previous post, with the confusing time stamps removed;
a fairly straightforward algebraic notation log .

[WhiteElo "1700"]
[BlackElo "1875"]
[PlyCount "30"]

1. e4 Nf6
2. e5 Nd5
3. c4 Nb4
4. f4 N8a6
5. a3 Nc6
6. b4 Nd4
7. Bb2 Nf5
8. Bd3 Nh4
9. Nf3 Nxg2+
10. Kf2 Nxf4
11. Qc2 e6
12. Bxh7 g6
13. Bxg6 Nxg6
14. Rg1 Nf4
15. Ke3 Bh6

0-1

The action in this game will probably be some of the easiest to understand of any chess game you will ever see: GET THE BLACK HORSE!!

Literally every move you see after White's very first move in this post is a threat to take my knight, either on White's next turn or the turn immediately after that:

Things get a little more complicated in this second set.
But only a little.
Still the chase theme continues.

Note that it is actually considered a BAD idea to move one piece at the beginning of a game continually to the exclusion of all others.
I'm not sure if that holds in this case, though.
For, in a very real sense, by single-mindedly pursuing my knight after every move I make, my opponent is effectively allowing ME to control his pieces.

At any rate, after sending 3 pawns and 2 bishops after it, my opponent offers me a trade with his own knight, which I do not accept. Far better for me, given I literally haven't moved a single piece save my other knight this whole game, to take out the pawn that would have avenged his knight, simultaneously checking his King. Knight attacks CANNOT be blocked; his King is forced to move:

There is only one move of safety for my knight, but it allows me to capture a 2nd pawn. White empowers his bishop by putting his queen behind it.
My pawn move of e6 blocks the pawn at e5, which in turns stops White's dark-squared bishop from being able to do much.
White retaliates by taking my king's rook pawn, confident my rook won't dare to do anything for fear of his queen. When I move up my King's knight pawn to trap his bishop, he takes that, too:

My knight takes that bishop, avenging the loss of his pawn:

Now White moves to attack with his rook, doubtless thinking I'M thinking my knight safe because "no one would give up a rook worth 5 points for a knight worth only 3" ...

Of course, I DON'T think that, I know better; I know that if I let my knight stay there, he WILL take it out with his rook, even though it would be taken by my king's bishop's pawn, because then his queen could swoop down and take THAT, simultaneously attacking my king, and making things VERY hot VERY quickly.
So I make my knight retreat once more to safety, and when White's king pursues, I move my king's bishop to protect it.

This final move looks unremarkable, but by this point White's forces are in shambles. Only 3 pieces have been taken off the board by me, all by my knight, but its next move will be a discovered check on White's king, due to my bishop moving where it did, giving me initiative to force a truly losing exchange or worse on him. He's lost his ability to castle. His remaining bishop, otherwise excellently placed, is blocked by his own pawn, and looks to stay that way.
Most importantly, his King is only 1 step away from the border, open to attacks that promise to be VERY insistent in only a moment or 2.

He resigns on this one, concluding a short but interesting game.

There's a dark side to the fitness industry.
It's inspired a lot of good in the lives of average people over the years but, for some ...

Screenshot from CyberCop, a game I played in my youth.
I don't remember why I saved it, but I didn't want to dispose of it first and THEN suddenly remember ...

Guluzar Tufenk, who presents as a surprisingly good facsimile of one of the women shown in the fan art above ...

Screenshots that should remind me of the liavaag.org website, which, except for not recognizing queenside castling commands, and, I think, en passant, is a semi-decent chess playing site. Far more importantly for me, EXCEPT for games involving the 2 special situations mentioned, liavaag.org "offline game versus friend" option essentially gives me a model creation/exercise demonstration board for chess concepts.

The scan set above will probably be used to discuss the features, benefits, and drawbacks of castling in the near future.

When time is at it's smallest raindrops fall anew.
Thus a botanical approach at chess can create infinite possibilities.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hhAnqzIJ7bc
Connie Nielsen on 2016 training experience for Wonder Woman.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WdmYrnO7Il8
NYC woman armwrestling streetwalkers

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dNCtuDYA0uE
'nother Connie Nielsen interview, generic answers and her favorite scene

Ali versus "luckiness" of rematch:
http://www.heavyweightblog.com/3837/muhammad-alis-rematches-are-the-reason-for-his-status

Sensation Comics #26; presumably the 2nd volume:*

*I KNOW it's not the first one, titles notwithstanding; I've read Sensation Comics #26 Volume ONE before, which dates back to the 1940s ...

1787

What a difference a day can make; sadly, not always for the better.

Kobe was one of the first NBA stars I noticed that wasn't of the Old Guard, wasn't an adult at least 15 years my senior when I was having hoop dreams of Isaiah Thomas, Vinnie Johnson, Joe Dumars, Dennis Rodman, Karl Malone, Kareem Abdul-Jabar, Spud Webb, Mugsy Bogues, Michael Jordan, and the like ...

Game played against a lower ranked.

Though I put on a clinic for this guy in this particular game, I typically spend a portion of Monday getting washed by such opponents; I seriously doubt my ranking will be remotely what it shows here on the blitz site by week's end.

[WhiteElo "1672"]
[BlackElo "1893"]
[PlyCount "40"]

1. d4 {[%emt 0:0:2]} e5 {[%emt 0:0:2]} 2. d5 {[%emt 0:0:5]} e4 {[%emt 0:0:2]} 3. c4 {[%emt 0:0:3]} Bb4+ {[%emt 0:0:8]} 4. Bd2 {[%emt 0:0:4]} e3 {[%emt 0:0:2]} 5. Bxb4 {[%emt 0:0:3]} exf2+ {[%emt 0:0:2]} 6. Kxf2 {[%emt 0:0:3]} Qf6+ {[%emt 0:0:3]} 7. Ke1 {[%emt 0:0:13]} Qh4+ {[%emt 0:0:31]} 8. g3 {[%emt 0:0:10]} Qxc4 {[%emt 0:0:3]} 9. Qb3 {[%emt 0:0:17]} Qc1+ {[%emt 0:0:19]} 10. Qd1 {[%emt 0:0:17]} Qxd1+ {[%emt 0:0:15]} 11. Kxd1 {[%emt 0:0:6]} Nf6 {[%emt 0:0:2]} 12. Nc3 {[%emt 0:0:10]} d6 {[%emt 0:0:14]} 13. h3 {[%emt 0:0:10]} Na6 {[%emt 0:0:10]} 14. Ba3 {[%emt 0:0:14]} 0-0 {[%emt 0:0:10]} 15. e4 {[%emt 0:0:11]} Nh5 {[%emt 0:0:21]} 16. Bxa6 {[%emt 0:0:9]} Nxg3 {[%emt 0:0:12]} 17. Bxb7 {[%emt 0:0:7]} Bxb7 {[%emt 0:0:3]} 18. Rh2 {[%emt 0:0:3]} Nf1 {[%emt 0:0:15]} 19. Ke2 {[%emt 0:0:51]} Nxh2 {[%emt 0:0:11]} 20. Nb5 {[%emt 0:0:23]} Ba6 {[%emt 0:0:3]Guest2876918 gibt auf} 0-1

In this game, which is the same as the game played in my previous post, I'm playing as Black. My opponent opens with d4, which means in real life terms that he moves the pawn in front of his White Queen up 2 spaces to get to that square for his first turn. Note that the only piece on the entire board that can legally move TO that square to begin the game IS the pawn in front of White's queen.

In response, I move my KING's pawn up 2 spaces, expecting him to take that pawn. He doesn't. He simply marches forward. When I simply march MY same pawn forward again, though, he move the pawn in front of his Queen's bishop up 2 squares for its first turn:

I know from experience that this brand of pacifism won't last, so my next move is to challenge him with a direct attack on his king, a check by my bishop, which he moves his own bishop into place to block. Then I march my King's pawn forward yet again:

Note that I do not recommend this. Even a 7 year old can see that my bishop has no back-up and is free for taking. So, take it he does, and my only response is to attack his King so that his King can take that piece as well.

So, I'm down three points, and spent all that time just moving my king's pawn which is now gone, and have developed none of my pieces.

Alright! Goals met!

Now to harass him with my queen:

Ends badly for her. But that can happen when you use a queen early in the game. And it happened for his queen, too.

The rest of the game is somewhat predictable.

While my moves lose me my queen, bishop, and pawns, they compensate by retarding his own development, weakening his defense, and exposing his King to attack.

Is it accidental that, after my harassing his dark square bishop with my knight, my opponent takes my knight out at the cost of his more valuable piece?
Probably not, though it makes sense from any perspective:

1. I accomplished an enormous unbalancing of his forces by using the most straightforward pieces unconventionally. Does he really want to see what I could do with a piece DESIGNED to bring some chaos to the board?

2. What will happen to pieces blocked in if you put them against a piece whose attacks CANNOT be blocked? What will your winning chances be if you have to spend time avoiding costly trades?

3. If you've got the advantage, why NOT force trades until your opponent has nothing left and you still have men on the board?

----------

My opponent then surprises me with aggressive counter threats to other pieces, instead of conventional defense. Unfortunately, he seems to lose track of his rook at a crucial moment:

I am surprised one last time, when, despite losing his rook, my opponent is still willing to make a go of things, but now I follow up with a pin that will take one of his Knights as well:

Hindsight is some of the most accurate there is; able to examine it carefully now and count up pieces and the like, I can see, PENDING the taking of his knight, my opponent and I are evenly matched, point-wise.

But in a second, HE will be the one 3 points down, and he doesn't seem to have confidence he can battle from deficit to success as I often do.

Highest "win" ever for me, but I don't think for a moment this guy was doing anything other than being drunk, trolling, or something of the like ...

[WhiteElo "1877"]
[BlackElo "3948"]
[PlyCount "11"]

1. e4 {[%emt 0:0:3]} e5 {[%emt 0:0:2]} 2. f4 {[%emt 0:0:2]} Nc6 {[%emt 0:0:1]} 3. Bc4 {[%emt 0:0:7]} d6 {[%emt 0:0:1]} 4. Bxf7+ {[%emt 0:0:3]} Kxf7 {[%emt 0:0:2]} 5. Nf3 {[%emt 0:0:5]} Bg4 {[%emt 0:0:3]} 6. 0-0 {[%emt 0:0:17]} 1-0