Originally posted by Wonder Man
Long distance time travel should be shorter than other types.
I might come back to this one; several concepts that may or may not be related came to mind when I saw this line:
--> the twin paradox, where a 30 year old man taking a round trip near-light-speed for several hours finds his same-age brother who stayed behind is now an old man
--> the extraordinary amount of time it seemed to take to walk the state fairgrounds versus how long it took to fly to Chicago
--> political Islam, taught by a man named Warner, who sites how, by shutting down sea travel, trips were made EXTREMELY slow and expensive in the ancient world. The Mediterranean Sea was like the superhighway of that day; waterways in general were. Even routes that were several times longer in distance than the conventional land routes took MUCH less time to travel.
--> Stalingrad, 1942. Probably the most extreme case of slow travel progress that I know of. Germany's armies were slowed from conquering miles of land to being lucky if they took a few literal yards of territory; going from conquering cities to fighting days, and sometimes even weeks, for a single house.
Originally posted by Wonder Man
How many does it take a regular champion to win in chess?
I'm thinking there probably IS a rough standard range of how long, in terms of moves, it takes champions, on average, to win their games.
Just about every OTHER aspect of chess is covered by people, so, why not?
--------------
mmm
Random: I don't know Italian, but I get the sense the man and woman in this video are more than just friends ...