I dont get paid enough for this!!!!!

Originally posted by Ianus
I uh, don't see how Dooku could be hard pressed to fight Grievious if Obi-Wan could handle him.

Too lazy to learn to spell as well.

ohh woops held my hand on d and s is close to z on the keyboard. my bad! look it's gone!

And isn't there a z in "lazy"?

there is. look! stop mocking my spelling.

Edited huh?

no, Raz helped. 🙄

Eh, Makashi is the refinement of lightsaber to lightsaber fighting. This would give Dooku the edge since Grievious uses.... lightsabers.

Soresu is a defensive style that focuses on deflecting lightsaber blasts. Please note that Dooku pwns Obi-Wan like it's his job. Dooku > Obi-Wan > Grievious. I think that statement from LOE is pretty shaky, considering that I like Luceno and all, but it holds little merit. Dooku trained Grievious and he beat the guy who beat Grievious badly. This makes Dooku well above Grievious in saber combat. That's ignoring the obvious advantage of Force powers.

The only point being contested is wether he'd be swamped in numbers. I don't think that would happen in this case. Dooku has shown in the past to be able to handle numbers (Obi and Ani).

Originally posted by Darth Avis
that comic was bull. Ask faunus.

Alright people, that fight that MAKASHIMAN talks about like the Bible? It's bull. It's from Star Wars Tales for crying out loud. The books in which, in one story, Han and Chewie crash to Earth and are discovered by freakin' Indiana Jones! That series is just some assortment of made-up stories. Not Canon. So that never happened.

From asajj vs GG.

Nice to see what people say about me behind my back. If it says it on SW.com it's factual. My name is Reverend M@k@shi....

~RM~horse

this was from a long time ago. nice to see you. SW.com uses all sources canon or not.

Originally posted by Darth Avis
this was from a long time ago. nice to see you. SW.com uses all sources canon or not.

Nice to be back. But my point in case is that when SW.com says something in writing it's pretty much dry cement.

give me a link.

Eh, I would beg to differ. They've been inaccurate or exaggerated before. Not saying this is a case example, but to say that Starwars.com is a "dry cement" type source is ridiculous. It's hardly in-depth and accurate enough to consider for a one-stop source.

thank you.

Originally posted by Ianus
Eh, I would beg to differ. They've been inaccurate or exaggerated before. Not saying this is a case example, but to say that Starwars.com is a "dry cement" type source is ridiculous. It's hardly in-depth and accurate enough to consider for a one-stop source.

Yes I know they put out BS but what other sites can be considered thruthful? Wiki?

i like wiki. it's on my favorites. ✅ 👆 🤓 ✅

Originally posted by ReverendM@k@shi
Yes I know they put out BS but what other sites can be considered thruthful? Wiki?

The best source is a thorough, first hand one. This means researching the crap yourself, getting the movies, script copies, comics, etc. yourself.

Next best thing would be relying on websites like SW.com and Wikicities Star Wars (Which is a bit more accurate than normal Wikipedia entries). However, it's important to be able to separate the bias and the hyperbole from fact, which is why sources like these get twisted and abused by members here at KMC. If it supports their argument, people will run with one sentence and make it into an entire theory.

Dooku would own teh learners

I say Dooku makes them look like evolutions litle joke