this is really stupid...

Originally posted by Jedi Priestess
yes it is and I reported it as it doesnt even come close to the pg-13 limitation of this board

How come? It's a fat guy and a woman sucking on toes. Last I knew, that qualified as PG-13.

oh come Lance, no way does that rate pg13.......many have commented on the sheer grossness of the pic 😖 Not like it matters anyway because nothing will get done about it, it's always been anything goes at kmc so why would today be any different.

Originally posted by Jedi Priestess
oh come Lance, no way does that rate pg13.......many have commented on the sheer grossness of the pic 😖 Not like it matters anyway because nothing will get done about it, it's always been anything goes at kmc so why would today be any different.

I don't see anything wrong about it. If you find fat guys gross then stop talking to me then. I myself am overweight.

There is nothing Rated R about that signature, thus is rates PG-13 or below. Which is allowed on KMC. It's just for shock value, nothing more.

Its not the fact that its of a fat guy. OK, what is objectable is what the said fat guy is doing and the oh nevermind.......like I said its pointless, this whole section is a shiethole anymore anyway.

I know I'm a moron, and yes it does gross me out, but I don't see anything TOO wrong with it. But don't get me wrong, it's gross 😘

thank you ken, i'll probably be banned because I refuse to change it.
You can turn on network tv and see stuff twice as bad as my sig. Somebody with chopped off legs and arms and burned to as crisp is ok for pg-13 , but heavens we can't have a fat guy thats just too much.
whatever

I personally don't think it's against the rules but it is seemingly in poor taste. Looks photoshopped too.

oh and priestess just because you find something gross doesn't make it R, next time when you decide to run tattle tale on someone, you should take into consideration that not everyone shares your narrow minded pussy foot view of acceptable content.

Originally posted by Ken Kenobi
How come? It's a fat guy and a woman sucking on toes. Last I knew, that qualified as PG-13.

It doesn't.

It's overly sexual in nature and simply unpleasant. I told him to remove the sig, he refused, and met my request with immature insults about "my mom". He's now been permanently banned. Funny thing, he wouldn't have been banned if he just made his point in a decent, civilized manner.

Oh well, no more ugly fat guy playing with his breasts.

Damn. Pwned.

Originally posted by BackFire
It's overly sexual in nature and simply unpleasant.

Originally posted by BackFire
It doesn't.

It's overly sexual in nature and simply unpleasant. I told him to remove the sig, he refused, and met my request with immature insults about "my mom". He's now been permanently banned. Funny thing, he wouldn't have been banned if he just made his point in a decent, civilized manner.

Oh well, no more ugly fat guy playing with his breasts.

I've seen much more sexual signatures here on KMC (including images of women with a breast exposed but they never got in trouble), and ones much more gross as well.

But seeing as how he acted like a child after being requested to remove it...good riddance.

There's numerous things wrong with the sig.

1. The guy is ugly and simply not nice to look at. There's no reason to have a sig like that other then to just bother and annoy people - Trolling. Sigs like this have no place on this forum as they can/do disgust other members who don't wish to see some fat guy with DD breasts while they're trying to have a discussion.

2. It's very possible that the guy in the photo is under 18 years of age. It's also possible that Stinger doesn't have his permission to use that photo in his sig (assuming the picture isn't of stinger himself).

3. The insinuation of the picture is clear. It's sexual and unpleasant and has no place on the forum.

Sexual signatures are okay as long as people don't get offended by them or they're not overly explicit. These images where a woman's breast is exposed are also not allowed, you should report them if you see them, they are in a clear violation of the rules as well.

Just because some sexual/gross sigs slip by us doesn't mean that they're "okay".

After seeing all the illiterate and retarded threads of Stinger78 I hoped he would be banned but now it seems he is actually a very disturbed individual too..

I would have objected banning on his sig, acting like a child kinda does it though. I think I'm gonna use that siggie from now on. 😈

Originally posted by Ianus
Yeah. People in movies operate on the Honor System. If the bad guy attacks you with melee, you MUST respond with melee. If you are on opposing sides of a vast army, you must seek out your equal in combat and fight; the nearby combatants will widen the gap so you have plenty of swinging room. And no one will interfere with your battle.

Hah! I knew it! 😛

Originally posted by BackFire
It doesn't.

It's overly sexual in nature and simply unpleasant. I told him to remove the sig, he refused, and met my request with immature insults about "my mom". He's now been permanently banned. Funny thing, he wouldn't have been banned if he just made his point in a decent, civilized manner.

Oh well, no more ugly fat guy playing with his breasts.

daamn jawdrop

anyway back to the point of this thread. I did not think it was stupid at all because 95% of the fight was with lightsabers. I thought it was more dramatic how grevious was just about to kill obi and just then he shoots him with a blaster. I also thought more about how embarrasing it must have been for grevious to die from blaster shot

Originally posted by queeq
I would have objected banning on his sig, acting like a child kinda does it though. I think I'm gonna use that siggie from now on. 😈

Burn that sig and then pray to God that it was fake and not real.

Originally posted by BackFire
There's numerous things wrong with the sig.

1. The guy is ugly and simply not nice to look at.

Well, no offence but your sig isn't exactly beautiful either.

I wouldn't have banned him just for the sig. It doesn't show pornagraphy, and it doesn't seem overly expicit to me. But then again I'm not a mod so I couldn't have done anything about it.

If only he wasn't so idiotic as to make childish jokes.

I didnt ask that he be banned. I just thought the sig wasnt right. And BF agreed.