Re: Your own BAtman trilogy
Originally posted by DrDoom101
If you were directing your own batman trilogy pick three villains to portray in each of emMine
1) Ra's Al Ghul and Lady Shiva
2) Scarecrow and Two-Face
3) Joker and Riddler
Lady Shiva???
You pick the worst villains dude.Seriously I'm glad you ain't doing these movies 😉
1.Ra's Al Ghul and Scarecrow
2.The Joker and I'd introduce Harvey Dent.
3.Two-Face
Originally posted by NoFate007
...and a brief cameo by someone small like Lock-Up or something, someone nobody really cares about so he can get taken out very early on and just serves sort of as an opening fight.
have a brief cameo of villain like:
-the ventriloquist w/Scar-face - seems to be failry reallistic and would fit in.
Someone like the Ventriloquist is a very psychologically complex villain.You know the whole two seperate personalities in one mind thing??? It's even worse than Two Face.
I mean you can't just have this old guy pop up with a gangster puppet.He needs a little explanation 😉
Zsasz is simple enough.A sicko who likes to butcher people.That's why he was in Begins.He was simple and needed no big explanations.
Originally posted by Doc Ock
Someone like the Ventriloquist is a very psychologically complex villain.You know the whole two seperate personalities in one mind thing??? It's even worse than Two Face.I mean you can't just have this old guy pop up with a gangster puppet.He needs a little explanation 😉
Zsasz is simple enough.A sicko who likes to butcher people.That's why he was in Begins.He was simple and needed no big explanations.
Exactly. Zsasz's cameo is something that I really liked, that's what I'm going for here. That's why I mentioned Lock-Up, because he virtually needs no backstory and can just beat down/get beat down and then be...well...locked..up...
Re: Re: Your own BAtman trilogy
Originally posted by Doc Ock
1.Ra's Al Ghul and Scarecrow
2.The Joker and I'd introduce Harvey Dent.
3.Two-Face
Originally posted by Doc Ock
No villains in the first movie would dramatically decrease the success of your movie.You'd have to include at least one major villain.
Originally posted by Zarathustra
The Roman (Falcone) is a fine villain: besides, Batman has a whole city against him, that's plenty. Batman fans know Year One, and being a work by Frank Miller it is pretty well regarded. Do you really think that people who weren't already big Batman fans knew or cared who Ra's was? Certainly not. Ra's Al Ghul did not draw crowds to Batman Begins. Batman did.
and the Joker in the sequel will draw more fans. Why doesnt Spiderman just have the villain be chameleon or vulture? figure out why. Great superheroes need great villains.
People need to identify with a villain though. They can't identify with half a town. Yes, that is adequate enough for a challenge, however not a movie challenge. Wouldn't you agree that, technically speaking, Chameleon in Spider-Man would be INSANELY destructive? Systems crumbling and identities being stolen, etc....but nobody wants to see that. Its not exciting. Batman isn't gonna fight Joe Idiot on the side of the road for yelling at him or something. You need an evil person when you're dealing with a character that has such a cool gallery of villains to choose from. Fans would go nuts if you had a Batman movie and didn't even at least count in someone like The Ventriloquist....as bad as that would be for the sole villain.
Re: Re: Your own BAtman trilogy
Originally posted by Doc Ock
Lady Shiva???You pick the worst villains dude.Seriously I'm glad you ain't doing these movies 😉
1.Ra's Al Ghul and Scarecrow
2.The Joker and I'd introduce Harvey Dent.
3.Two-Face
Oh I dont know about that.Isnt lady shiva the one with the red outfit? I would love to see her if it is.
Mine are almost the same as yours are.
1.Ra's Al Ghul and scarecrow
2.The Joker and introduce Harvery Dent.
3.two face and penguin.
Villains don't need to dress up in asinine get-ups to be appealing. Falcone and the other families, crooked Commissioner Loeb and Detective Flass (ex-Green Beret and enforcer, not fat imbecile), fascist zealot/SWAT commander Branden: these are evil men. It's up to the writers to make them appealing and they can be every bit as appealing as Ra's Al Ghul or any other fixture in the rogues gallery. They are just as sympathetic as Ra's because they too can sit down and explain to you why things need to be done their way: and the police on the roster do just that with Jim Gordon. They're the men that tell you you need to accept things the way they are: make your way and suvive in a tough town like Gotham. There's just no way to make a difference. The apathy, the weakness that they try to sell to you might even pass muster if not for two good men standing up and refusing to settle for second rate. These are just the men to stand next to Bruce Wayne and James Gordon. To quote Gordon, they "Showed me what it takes to be a cop [or a hero] in Gotham".
Frankly, if "the fans" don't want that, I pity them their closed mindedness.