How can a plane land at southpole's center right-side up instead of upside down?

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
I did answer my own question? How? You referring to my "Things stand up in accordance to their positions." statement?

So by that "answer" then a plane would land upside down, underneath the globe, because of the accordance of it's planted position?

Weren't you opposed to that view, yet you're telling me I answered my own question that you now seem to agree with, just by simply saying that I answered my question..

lol, I just want a logical answer to my question cause I don't know the answer.

Up-side down to who? The plane or you? I wasn't opposed, I stated that because of the earths principal of gravity and the illusion of a curve to be straight cause the optical sensors to see the plane as upside down. But the plane would say it's right side up. So it's all in concordance to who see's the plane. Here's a better example.
The sun appears to come out of the earthin the morning but go back in at night. When in fact the sun comes from the side. But because of your "up-side down" theory we see the sun as coming up.

this is like pulling teeth

you are standing on the floor looking at the ball with the plane stuck to the bottom of it...hence the plane appears upside down

imagine looking at the ball while standing on the ceiling...

the plane would look like it was on the top of the ball

because space has no up or down then the position of objects on the planets surface are all just relative to the angle you are looking at them from

It's not difficult to explain, just hard to understand. Because it can't be said, it can only be shown. Throwing the ball is another good example. But the only reason why it seems upside down, and I failed to mention this before, is because of our own eye sight. Because our vision is straight, and not curved like that of the earth, we see the plane as upside down. I'll see If I can get a picture I did up and running...

this should help

Don't believe them North star... There lying... they all believe the brain washing the govenment did....

For the truth go there...
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/fe-scidi.htm

Once you realise The truth... as it easy to understand...
Become a member...
http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm
The proof page clearly shows why the earth is flat... All those points are washed over by scientists paid by the govenment...

Spoiler:
I am joking... but the site isn't LOL

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
Don't believe them North star... There lying... they all believe the brain washing the govenment did....

For the truth go there...
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/fe-scidi.htm

Once you realise The truth... as it easy to understand...
Become a member...
http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm
The proof page clearly shows why the earth is flat... All those points are washed over by scientists paid by the govenment...

Spoiler:
I am joking... but the site isn't LOL

lol

What, is this a joke intended to make me laugh? Cause if it is, it worked.

Your offered piece attached to your provided link was more humerous & amusing than it was non-sensical.

The Earth is clearly the shape of a sphere and not flat. You're late, it's only been, oh 555 years since such a foolish assumption was discredited.

The concept of your offered piece on the shape of the Earth, was flat (no pun intended). On the other hand there is spacial photographic proof the the Earth is in the shape of a Sphere, and not flat.

And how do you explain sunrises and sets on our "flat" wolrd? Does our Sun run underneath our table-like planet? Or do we spin over and under then back up, lol. You, the scientists who wrote the non-sense you gave me to read and their outlandish theories have no basis and that ontop of that fact that your relying on theory (guesses, basically) whilst I'm relying on evidencial proof, fact. But we digress.

Originally posted by AOR
this should help

Aaand,..what do I do with this picture?

Is that an upside down plane?

Underneath a sphere, ok? That's what I was describing..

I clearly said in the spoiler I was joking... But the question your bringing up falls into the proof on the one site...

I can only believe that this is a joke. Anyone with the ability to sit down and type a coherent sentence on a keyboard had to at one time frequent a school, and that school hat to teach them the basic concepts of gravity.

If this isn't a joke...then we are all doomed.

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
I clearly said in the spoiler I was joking... But the question your bringing up falls into the proof on the one site...

Just as clearly as you said, on that same spoiler that the "site isn't", which is what I was refering to..

We are doomed...not much critical thinking being done in schools to day. 😉

People are taught what to think...not how to think....and how to think from different views.

Originally posted by debbiejo
We are doomed...not much critical thinking being done in schools to day. 😉

People are taught what to think...not how to think....and how to think from different views.

lol, excuse me?

I don't know if you were referring to me, but if you are.

Are you insinuating I was under-taught in school and am not a critical thinker because i'm not accepting his or the dead scientific belifs the writers of that piece, were blurting out?

Then I apoligize for not being foolish, lol

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Aaand,..what do I do with this picture?

Is that an upside down plane?

Underneath a sphere, ok? That's what I was describing..

The image is a human on the earth, and the plane at the south pole (keeping the picture in context to the north and south pole found on a certified map). The red lines show human eye sight as it is, and the blue line (although it is black due to a downloading quality on the computer, the blue line is the curved one) shows what the human eye sight would have to be in order to the plane right-side up as it passes from hemisphere. Now imagine the sphere was a crystal, one from which you can see right through. If you were to dig a hole all the way down, and underneath the plane, that’s were you’d get underneath the plane, however the plane would now be right-side up. This only proves my previous statement the it is an illusion. The illusion is that you see the plane or any object on the opposite pole as upside down, due to the considerable distance between you and the pole as well as the point from which you are standing from. Now if you were to cut the circle in half like the picture below you can clearly see that the plane is right side up. Once again revolving around my theory of illusion (no pun intended).

Originally posted by jaden101
everything has a gravitational force

Are you sure about that? What about in space.

Originally posted by KidRock
Are you sure about that? What about in space.

Well following the theory of "The big crunch" there is some cosmetic pull that is bringing the universe together. Also known as the "Omega Point".

This term is used by Tulane University professor of mathematics and physics Frank J. Tipler to describe a hypothetical cosmological scenario in the far future of the Universe. According to the omega point theory, as the Universe comes to an end in a Big Crunch, the computational capacity of the Universe is capable of increasing at a sufficient rate that this computation rate is accelerating exponentially faster than time runs out. In principle, a simulation run on this Universe-computer can thus continue forever in its own terms, even though the external Universe lasts only a finite time. This theory assumes that certain cosmological variables prove that the universe will eventually contract, and that there will be intelligent civilizations in existence at the appropriate time to exploit the computational capacity of such an environment.

Originally posted by AOR
Well following the theory of "The big crunch" there is some cosmetic pull that is bringing the universe together. Also known as the "Omega Point".

This term is used by Tulane University professor of mathematics and physics Frank J. Tipler to describe a hypothetical cosmological scenario in the far future of the Universe. According to the omega point theory, as the Universe comes to an end in a Big Crunch, the computational capacity of the Universe is capable of increasing at a sufficient rate that this computation rate is accelerating exponentially faster than time runs out. In principle, a simulation run on this Universe-computer can thus continue forever in its own terms, even though the external Universe lasts only a finite time. This theory assumes that certain cosmological variables prove that the universe will eventually contract, and that there will be intelligent civilizations in existence at the appropriate time to exploit the computational capacity of such an environment.

Interesting. And conceptual, to say the least, but I don't go by forseen (or in this case, unforseen) theory. Space is probably the most mysteriously spontaneous natural element known that even theories, which are practically inteligent guesses, cannot uncover answers from, in my opinion.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Interesting. And conceptual, to say the least, but I don't go by forseen (or in this case, unforseen) theory. Space is probably the most mysteriously spontaneous natural element known that even theories, which are practically inteligent guesses, cannot uncover answers from, in my opinion.

So I'm guessing this shift of topic must mean that you have understood my explanations and thus your querry is settled?

Originally posted by KidRock
Are you sure about that? What about in space.

Objects in space still have a gravitational pull -- the term 'zero gravity' is misleading as there is always gravity - just not necessarily the same amount as on earth.

It's very simple. Down is towards the core of the Earth (or if you were on the moon, it'd be towards the core of the moon, etc). If you were to stick two little toy cars on a globe, say, one on the south pole and the other on New York, it'd look like the one on the south pole was upside down. But turn the globe over, and it'd be the other way around.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Still don't get it.

our perception of 'down' is the draw we feel toward the earth's center.
thats what 'up' and 'down' in you're equilibrium is based on...its called gravity.

i cant believe this is even debatable 😑

When i was a kid, i used to think that the Nile was just the sea flowing inland towards the mountains. 😂