Poll
33%
68%
Why is George Reeve not included? Given the time period of his TV show "The Adventures of Superman," and what he had to work with, he did a damn good job (the show was a success). He brought a maturity to Superman even Chris didn't have, had a more infectious smile and overall, IMO, was a better actor (not that either of them had spectacular careers). It's a shame he couldn't get work after "Superman." Part of the reason was Hollywood politics: Reeve was a womanizer which, many believe, ultimately led to his death (ie, not by suicide).
😂
Talk about not knowing which way to go.
I always figured the internet to be a fairly reliable source of information, if you know where to look...but apparently, even this stumps the net.
Depending on which website you go to, it's either George Reeve or Reeves (some have both!). The preponderance seems to be Reeve, however, plus I checked with an independent source.
It is Reeve, singlular, just like Chris' last name. In fact, when "Superman" came out in '78, there was some dispelled speculation that they were related because of having the same last name.
Originally posted by roughrider
It's George Reeves.With due respect to him, Reeves, like Adam West, should be out of the equation for considering their work. Different time, different level of respect for comic heroes.
Let's not forget Kirk Alyn. I think he did the serials.
That's not fair.
You're saying "Well, George Reeves did it ages ago and lived in a different time frame, therefore he must be the best.
Originally posted by Darth Zannah
That's not fair.You're saying "Well, George Reeves did it ages ago and lived in a different time frame, therefore he must be the best.
How about, George Reeve(s) did the TV series. TV is, for the most part, a more shallow artistic field than Motion Pictures. So, like Adam West, the criteria for judging the qualty of his work should be confined to that area. Actors who do these roles in films, they are on a different level.