Namor in a cage match vs Spidey and Wolverine

Originally posted by Metalmanx
After serious contemplation...I now think that Spiderman and Wolverine can take this.

And by Spiderman and Wolverine, I pretty much just mean Spiderman. Wolverine is cannon fodder. I guess Spidey could throw him, or use him as a bat or something.

I think Spidey does have what it takes to bring Namor down. And...I guess with the "help" of Wolverine, those chances do increase indeed. Especially since when Spidey really doesn't hold back, his strength exceeds even his believed limitations.

And I also agree with who?-kid. Former herald of Galactus or not, Spidey took it to Firelord. Spidey's rage increased as well, which we've all seen is almost directly proportional to his strength and speed. He layed dozens of powerful punches all over Firelord, while avoiding everything Firelord tried to throw at him. It's understandable that he was knocked out.

My new vote, Spidey and Wolverine 6.5/10.

Originally posted by Metalmanx
Namor 7/10.

Spidey can definitely pull a few wins out though when he's enraged. He's surprised his stronger foes before. But other than those few times, Namor pretty much outclasses him.

Twister: i think Spidey wins and could beat namor(post 10 scans and made my point)

Originally posted by Metalmanx
And is Twister still imitating a Spiderman fanboy? That's got to be the only answer.

see how namor has a lose vs wolverine and no win I dont realy think he could take even a win from them.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=379600&perpage=20&highlight=&pagenumber=1 😖hifty:

Originally posted by jrodslam
Ok now I have some questions.

Didnt Spidey beat Firelord with the symbiote? Which makes all his attributes better? Someone correct me if im wrong.

Secondly, Metalmanx bring up Spiderman being raged helped. Well Namor enraged has helped him focus as well in the past. Also while enraged, he was able to double and re-double his strength. Do you honestly think spiderman can ko Namor with punches? Ok he beat Firelord. How durable is he? And isnt it in the forum rules not to bring that battle up?

Are we now saying that because A beat B, that means that A can beat C as well.

Cause it seems that because Spidey beat Firelord, then he can beat Namor.

Cause if thats the case, Namor beat Hulk, stalemated Surfer who is said to be > Firelord, stalemated Thor and Hercules, so he can beat Spidey and Wolverine. Im just going by others logic.

I'm pretty sure that wasn't the symbiote, just a new costume that resembled it.

Sometimes using the "A beat B so A can beat C" logic makes sense. I mean, hell, Wolverine fans continue to say that Wolverine can hold his own (or win...hah) against Hulk, so he can't be defeated by anyone weaker than Hulk.

Not that I agree with that, but I'm just saying.

Originally posted by Metalmanx
I'm pretty sure that wasn't the symbiote, just a new costume that resembled it.

Sometimes using the "A beat B so A can beat C" logic makes sense. I mean, hell, Wolverine fans continue to say that Wolverine can hold his own (or win...hah) against Hulk, so he can't be defeated by anyone weaker than Hulk.

Not that I agree with that, but I'm just saying.

✅

Originally posted by Metalmanx
I'm pretty sure that wasn't the symbiote, just a new costume that resembled it.

Sometimes using the "A beat B so A can beat C" logic makes sense. I mean, hell, Wolverine fans continue to say that Wolverine can hold his own (or win...hah) against Hulk, so he can't be defeated by anyone weaker than Hulk.

Not that I agree with that, but I'm just saying.

Can you prove that it wasnt? Im not 100% sure myself. Can anyone confirm this?

And no sometimes using A beat B so A can beat C makes no sense. It hold no weight at all. A may be able to use certain tactics to beat B that might not work on C. Thus C would cream his/her ass.

Fans can say Wolverine has held his own against Hulk but Namor on ther other hand has beat him multiple times. Its easy for me to say that the people Namor beat/stalemated > those who Wolverine beat/stalemated.

Originally posted by jrodslam
Can you prove that it wasnt? Im not 100% sure myself. Can anyone confirm this?

And no sometimes using A beat B so A can beat C makes no sense. It hold no weight at all. A may be able to use certain tactics to beat B that might not work on C. Thus C would cream his/her ass.

Fans can say Wolverine has held his own against Hulk but Namor on ther other hand has beat him multiple times. Its easy for me to say that the people Namor beat/stalemated > those who Wolverine beat/stalemated.

Originally posted by wolverine8888
ya funny u say that namor has beaten wolverine multiple times lol. see how they have only foughten twice and once was a draw and the second fight wolverine won in a few seconds of battle.

Its obvious that you didnt comprehend what i said.

I was saying Namor beat Hulk multiple times. I know Namor and Wolvie only fought twice.

Originally posted by jrodslam
Its obvious that you didnt comprehend what i said.

I was saying Namor beat Hulk multiple times. I know Namor and Wolvie only fought twice.

sorry about that. that was my bad. also namor has lost a good many tiems and most of his victories were him in water which aint realy a fair fight.

Why is that not a fair fight? It's his natural element. It's really his opponents' faults for being led into the water. They should be a little more wise to his intentions.

If you wanna get technical about it, everytime Namor fights out of the water, it's an unfair advantage to the opponent.

Originally posted by wolverine8888
sorry about that. that was my bad. also namor has lost a good many tiems and most of his victories were him in water which aint realy a fair fight.

Its all good. Namor has lost a good many times to who? Not Hulk for sure lol. But noone is unbeatable.

in water giving him a hgue advantage. any ways hulks realy the only person dumb enough to go into the water to fight namor lol

Originally posted by jrodslam
Its all good. Namor has lost a good many times to who? Not Hulk for sure lol. But noone is unbeatable.

Originally posted by wolverine8888
in water giving him a hgue advantage. any ways hulks realy the only person dumb enough to go into the water to fight namor lol

Hercules did. So did Abomination and many others.

Originally posted by wolverine8888
hes lsot the the hulk befor I dont know how many timrs though

Not that i can recall. In an actual battle, Hulk has never beat the Hulk that i know of. Sure Hulk has knocked Namor away(Avengers trying to jump him, or Namor and Surfer trying to hold him down) But a 1 on 1 fight? I dont think Hulk has ever beat him.

Actually, since wolverine8888 brought it up, apparently many opponents of Namor's are completely idiots.

Thor, for example, bum rushed Namor and forced him into the ocean. Stupid on Thor's part, yes. But would we call him an idiot? Nope.

Originally posted by jrodslam
Hercules did. So did Abomination and many others.

Originally posted by jrodslam
Not that i can recall. In an actual battle, Hulk has never beat the Hulk that i know of. Sure Hulk has knocked Namor away(Avengers trying to jump him, or Namor and Surfer trying to hold him down) But a 1 on 1 fight? I dont think Hulk has ever beat him.

Originally posted by wolverine8888
there both below average intel as well.

Actually Abomination isnt below agerage. Hes actually quite learned. Unlike Hulk he actually keeps his intelligence. And Herc is normal level of intelligence. Not below average. 😄

Originally posted by wolverine8888
I think there a pic on of respect hulk thread and ways has namor ever beaten hulk on land?

Pick of what? Hulk punching Namor? Was it a 1 on 1 fight without being stopped? Doubt it. When Namor beat Hulk, Hulk's ass was ko'd.

It doesnt matter if Namor's ever beat Hulk on land or not. I know theyve stalemated on land quite a few times.