Originally posted by Wonderer
...but what is in fact subjective and relative though, are the ways or paths to enlightenment/absolute truth (there are as many ways to enlightenment as there are people in existence
And this relative/subjective aspect of Buddhism...is what generates the religion's major contradiction. If truth is "absolute." Then the path would be the same for everyone, it would not change.
Let's use the example of 2 + 2 = 4 to demonstrate this contradiction.
first 2 = any person
second 2 = way to absolute Truth
4 = Absolute Truth
Now if we change the 2nd "2" to "3" we now get the equation...
2 + 3 = 5
Notice that when the "way to absolute truth" changes..the "absolute truth" changes.
Case in point..
Different paths..lead to different outcomes. To say that different paths lead to the same outcome..is a relative, contradictory, illogical..and just plain foolish argument.
I believe a wise man once said...
insanity is defined by doing the same thing over and over again..and expecting a different outcome each time.
*note( it was either Benjamin Franklin or Thomas Jefferson)
I would like to add to these wise words...by taking this definition one step further and stating that insanity is also defined by doing different things over and over again...and expecting the same outcome each time...
Fin