Wouldn't it be realistic for Frank Castle to die, and have another person take over as the next Punisher?
In private moments, like the first miniseries, he has admitted to himself that one day he will get too slow or sloppy, he'll be gone, and nothing will really change. He will never get all of them.
He is a character fated to die violently, someday.
Though he has inadventantly killed innocent people, it hasn't been enough to make him stop his mission. I wonder how many it would take.
You don't even understand the character of punisher...if there ever was another punisher he would be destroyed by enraged fans, the new punisher wouldn't last more than one issue...Ever read punisher the end, he goes to jail and kills alot of them there and then they put him in solitary so he cant get at them...he then goes out and kills the last people on earth who are business men who basically destroyed the earth...punisher then lets fire burn him to death...this is a very rough outline of what happened, if you haven't already, read it...and yeah the good he does out weighs the bad...
Originally posted by DarkCrawler
Has Punisher ever been on the courtroom for his crimes?I know some other anti-heroes who have...Hulk was at least in the Ultimates, and Namor has been once or twice.
Yeah... it was when he was drugged by Jigsaw. The lawyer went for the insanity plea and Frank snapped and either escaped or got beaten up... i forget.
I've read the Punisher since the 1980's - for someone who is purported to be the most real vigilante in comics, it would be perfectly natural to think someday his enemies catch up to him and gun him down. It was different when he was a selective assasin in the beginning, but he's gotten more and more brazen since the 80's - let's not even get into that weapons-from-heaven plotline; stay out of the fantasy side.
You know why his first miniseries was called Circle Of Blood? Because it shows for all the people he kills, he just creates more enemies for himself, and they follow the others.
You wonder whether someday a whole lots of heroes will turn on him as too much of a loose cannon; like the super-powered heroes turn on King Thor in his book.
Originally posted by roughriderSuperheros have turned on him, wolvie, dd, spidey and they all failed to bring him in, they get fuked up instead...don't get in franks way doesn't matter who you are...and punisher is realistic like batman is but to a lesser extent, punisher cannot be killed off for good it will never happen, if it does i will never read liturature again...
I've read the Punisher since the 1980's - for someone who is purported to be the most real vigilante in comics, it would be perfectly natural to think someday his enemies catch up to him and gun him down. It was different when he was a selective assasin in the beginning, but he's gotten more and more brazen since the 80's - let's not even get into that weapons-from-heaven plotline; stay out of the fantasy side.
You know why his first miniseries was called Circle Of Blood? Because it shows for all the people he kills, he just creates more enemies for himself, and they follow the others.You wonder whether someday a whole lots of heroes will turn on him as too much of a loose cannon; like the super-powered heroes turn on King Thor in his book.
Originally posted by jgiant
Superheros have turned on him, wolvie, dd, spidey and they all failed to bring him in, they get fuked up instead...don't get in franks way doesn't matter who you are...and punisher is realistic like batman is but to a lesser extent, punisher cannot be killed off for good it will never happen, if it does i will never read liturature again...
I mean really turn on him - no PIS or CIS. We forget, Frank is just a normal man with guns. He doesn't even have as much experience dealing with super-powered types as Batman, who always keeps detailed lists on his friends weaknesses, just in case. And has access to unreal weaponry.
For all that's been said, it doesn't mean Punisher is not interesting - quite the opposite. Someone like him who stands defiantly over the line is a needed counterpoint in mainstream comics. But there is always some writing manipulation that is happening; Batman's weakness, about being unable to kill, is hardly ever exploited.
Originally posted by roughrider
I've read the Punisher since the 1980's - for someone who is purported to be the most real vigilante in comics, it would be perfectly natural to think someday his enemies catch up to him and gun him down. It was different when he was a selective assasin in the beginning, but he's gotten more and more brazen since the 80's - let's not even get into that weapons-from-heaven plotline; stay out of the fantasy side.
You know why his first miniseries was called Circle Of Blood? Because it shows for all the people he kills, he just creates more enemies for himself, and they follow the others.You wonder whether someday a whole lots of heroes will turn on him as too much of a loose cannon; like the super-powered heroes turn on King Thor in his book.
Frank was sort of replaced once, it was in the Punisher 2099 series, in Franks journal it said "You who find this - I charge you to carry on my work" and it was found by a cop whos family was killed by criminals
Calling Frank a hero is debatable, but calling him a villain is retarded
It is not just what you do that makes you a hero, it is why you do it