There seems to be two ways to win an argument.

I should be taking notes on this....

Originally posted by Lana
I should be taking notes on this....

the golden goose of opportunity just dropped an egg in your lap. you BETTER be taking notes

WHOBDATROLL?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
There seems to be two ways to win an argument.
1. Give a solid convincing argument supported my facts.
2. Insult and bash your opponent at every turn until he/she gives up in disgust.

What do you think about this?

Third way...
...Ignore the facts; reason from self-serving premises being pushed as facts (one of those premises being, "I'm already right"😉; subtlely change the point to be made when cornered; and profess honorable innocence.

Originally posted by Mindship
Third way...
...Ignore the facts; reason from self-serving premises being pushed as facts (one of those premises being, "I'm already right"😉; keep changing the point to be made when cornered; and profess honorable innocence.

👆

fourth way:

put everyone in teh forum on ignore. If you can't see them, then you've one teh argument.

Originally posted by teh smart guy
👆

fourth way:

put everyone in teh forum on ignore. If you can't see them, then you've one teh argument.

😂

Originally posted by teh smart guy
👆

fourth way:

put everyone in teh forum on ignore. If you can't see them, then you've one teh argument.

fifth way:

create a sock account to argue against you in a very stupid manner.

Originally posted by Mindship
Third way...
...Ignore the facts; reason from self-serving premises being pushed as facts (one of those premises being, "I'm already right"😉; subtlely change the point to be made when cornered; and profess honorable innocence.

I think that would be a sub to # 2. Like 2.5.

Originally posted by teh smart guy
👆

fourth way:

put everyone in teh forum on ignore. If you can't see them, then you've one teh argument.

Now that would count as 3.

Originally posted by PVS
fifth way:

create a sock account to argue against you in a very stupid manner.

And that would be a sub of 3. Like 3.5.

😆

Originally posted by Soleran
the reason is that even though you are entitled to your opinion I could care less about it.........

if u could care less y dont u???

the phrase is: i couldn't care less, when sarcastically insulting someone you should do it so that it makes sense.....

Is that Whob again?

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Is that Whob again?

I say no.....what about a bet?

Originally posted by Bardock42
I say no.....what about a bet?

No, I'm not that sure. I'd have to waite to see if he made an *ss out of himself with every post.

The guy doesn't post at the same times as whob. If he's the same guy, he's redirected his career/life/sleeping schedule for the sake of KMC.

Originally posted by botankus
The guy doesn't post at the same times as whob. If he's the same guy, he's redirected his career/life/sleeping schedule for the sake of KMC.

That makes it more likely that it is actually him.

That would be sad.

Originally posted by botankus
That would be sad.

What exactly didn't you understand? We are talking about whob.

Look at the 'unintentional' typo in his title: 'i know more thank i think'...That's whobdamandog, fo' sho'.

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Look at the 'unintentional' typo in his title: 'i know more thank i think'...That's whobdamandog, fo' sho'.

I think he meant "I know more (than you) - Thanks, I think".....why I think he meant that? Who knows....not me....the man who sold the world.

all this bickering back and forth...its great...i love it

but really there is only one way to win an argument...and thats to be me

😆

i doubt thats whob.
he did create another sock account though.
he just hasnt posted under it yet.