Cin Drallig Vs Count Dooku (Lightsaber Only)

What difference does that assumption make? Dooku is noted as being the ONLY Makashi master of his time.

Only Makashi MASTER.

Where was that said, anyway?

Everyone else associated with Makashi is noted as being a 'practitioner', but Dooku is said to have perfected it to its finest degree, hence- master.

It's speculated Shaak Ti used Makashi primarily, but that's it...Dooku'd take this. And Sorgo? That's vandalism on Wiki and they have no tolerance for that crap.

And Dooku may've founded the Confederacy, but who owned Dooku?

WikiCities has some serious wishful thinking in there. They list Kun as a Makashi master, when he's never listed as such and indeed, his style looks nothing like Dooku's at all.

My ruling on Wikipedia/Wikicities:

Unless it can be found in the sources listed in the article, it cannot be used in a Vs. argument. And even then, said source has to be consider canon in the sense of EU. There are some stories, like Visionaries and Infinities, that isn't even canon there.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
It's speculated Shaak Ti used Makashi primarily, but that's it...Dooku'd take this. And Sorgo? That's vandalism on Wiki and they have no tolerance for that crap.

And Dooku may've founded the Confederacy, but who owned Dooku?

You vandalise these forums with your fanboyism.

Us Senior members have no tolerance for that shit.

Maybe if Cin was significant enough to be displayed on the Databank, we may be able to find out who he is.

Give me a source that says Cin EVEN practiced Makashi.

Not an editable one either.

So far, it's either ROTS, the novelization, or the game. I doubt it says it in the game, and it definitely says nothing in the movie.

Originally posted by Captain REX
So far, it's either ROTS, the novelization, or the game. I doubt it says it in the game, and it definitely says nothing in the movie.

Oh....

Is that the Novelisation that says Kit Fisto got his head chopped off and put on table?

😂

The only Drallig in ROTS novel is a dead Drallig. I think that Drallig is a Shii-Cho practicitioner, because he teaches padawans who learn Form 1.

Either a Form 1 practitioner or Djem So (Makashi isnt very much used anymore by the Jedi, according to those websites that you can edit e.g. wikipedia.)

Originally posted by gambit11111111
I think cin takes this fight,Because he is skilled with the saber.As dooku is With both,but uses alot of force

Actually that isn't true. Cin Drallig is only effective when he combines his lightsaber attacks with force speed like he did in the game. Without the force he is nothing special and seeing as this is an only lightsabers battle, Cin Drallig would easily lose. Dooku does not depend on the force in duels. He would have been able to duel with Anakin and Obi-Won all day, it is obvious in ROTS.

😂 dude, that's kind of dumb, because: what would any jedi/sith be without the force?

Without using the force, idiot.

Oooo watch your language. Anyway, you should have been more specific

It says lightsabers only at the top prick.

didn't i warn you, novice? besides, people often go off with these topics, so shut it (just to tell you, I'm being relatively polite)

Don't be polite. I'm not.

😂 so i can see

If im not polite, I'd be restricted. I'm walking a fine line here 😉

Council, knock it off. We don't need a smartass in the argument, there are already plenty.

Anyways, Sorgo, in the case of Kit Fisto being decapitated and so on, not everything in the novel is to be put over the movie. My point in saying that was perhaps it mentions in passing that Cin Drallig used Makashi or something; if there's nothing to contradict the book, then it's true. Fisto's decapitation is contradicted by the movie itself, and therefore, not.