Cin Drallig Vs Count Dooku (Lightsaber Only)

Council, knock it off. We don't need a smartass in the argument, there are already plenty.

😎

Anyways, Sorgo, in the case of Kit Fisto being decapitated and so on, not everything in the novel is to be put over the movie. My point in saying that was perhaps it mentions in passing that Cin Drallig used Makashi or something; if there's nothing to contradict the book, then it's true. Fisto's decapitation is contradicted by the movie itself, and therefore, not.

Considering Kit's death was a fine example of how the book contradicted the Movie, what makes you think what is said about Cin is liable information?

1) 😛

2) Because it isn't contradicted by anything else. That's assuming it says it in the novel at all; I haven't read it.

Originally posted by Captain REX
1) 😛

2) Because it isn't contradicted by anything else. That's assuming it says it in the novel at all; I haven't read it.

So if I mkae a version of the Star Wars Novel, can I just go ahead and say that Sidious uses Niman?

Would it be Canon?

If not, Explain.

Originally posted by Sorgo the Cruel
So if I mkae a version of the Star Wars Novel, can I just go ahead and say that Sidious uses Niman?

Would it be Canon?

If not, Explain.

Erm... actually the novels can't be properly canon in the grand scheme of things since, in the case of the ROTS novel, it directly contradicts the movies- the highest source material. Therefore, it is suspect.

Originally posted by darthsith19
It wouldn't be canon since other sources say against it. And I'm pretty sure you'd need Lucas's permission to write a ROTS novel. 😛

I'd be intrigued to hear of your Sources.

Then Lucas screwed up because Kit didn't get decapited on the Movie, his head wasn't placed on a table and judging by the look on his face I'm pretty damn sure he didn't die smiling.

Originally posted by Captain REX
Council, knock it off. We don't need a smartass in the argument, there are already plenty.

What? Blaming me not him? That's just unfair

Actually Lucas turned around and decided decap was 'too graphic'. The novel, where it doesn't cotnradict the movie is a perfectly valid source of information and right behind the movie and above almost anything else in the level of continuity

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Actually Lucas turned around and decided decap was 'too graphic'. The novel, where it doesn't cotnradict the movie is a perfectly valid source of information and right behind the movie and above almost anything else in the level of continuity

Oh I understand. Just one part is wrong and the rest is right?

No.

If Lucas changed that part of the movie, what makes you think he didn't change other things in his Mind?