UK Legalizes Gay Marriage

Originally posted by Sorgo
Homosexual Marriage is considerabely unatural and is questionably a Chemical Imbalance of the brain.

Homosexual-Sex has been in question of being part of a Brain defect.

Originally posted by Sorgo
Gay Marriage is still in Question to be a Malfunction of the Brain according to Scientests who have been researching Homosexuality for years.

Once there is direct proof of it being Natural, then I may just change.

Well I'm pretty sure there are tons of scientists who have studied homosexuality for centuries who came up with very different conclussions

Again Sorgo, it's not unatural because it happens in nature.

Originally posted by Fire
Well I'm pretty sure there are tons of scientists who have studied homosexuality for centuries who came up with very different conclussions

Oh of course! The fact that Homosexuality is in qeustion of it's naturality is just 50/50 balance to the fact it may be Natural/Unatural

Backfire:

Then everything must be Natural, right?

isn't the essence of something being 'natural' the fact that it happens in nature without us tampering with it?

Originally posted by Fire
isn't the essence of something being 'natural' the fact that it happens in nature without us tampering with it?

Originally posted by Sorgo
Oh of course! The fact that Homosexuality is in qeustion of it's naturality is just 50/50 balance to the fact it may be Natural/Unatural

[B]Backfire:

Then everything must be Natural, right? [/B]

If it happens in nature, yep.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Hi. Neuroscientist. Could you direct me to from where you derive this if you don't mind. Brain Research? Neuroscience? Journal of Clinical Neuroscience? Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy? Behavioral Neuroscience?

I stumbled across some interesting sites, Including ones that claimed that Homosexuality was a Disease and a Chemical Imbalance.

Type this into Google:

Homosexuality: a chemical imbalance?

Originally posted by BackFire
If it happens in nature, yep.

Then... In Essence... *EVERYTHING* is natural.

Then I wonder where Unaturality plays a Role. Does it not exist, Backfire?

And what makes you think that Homosexuality just isn't Opposite-Sex tampered with since it is only unatural when tampered with, right?

if you can give me proof of how heterosexuals pushed ppl (by persuasion, drugs or other treatment) into becoming gay, not discovering that they were gay all along but BECOMING gay, and not just to try it once, then in that case I might consider it unatural. But I doubt your gay friend thinks it is unatural.

Originally posted by Sorgo
I stumbled across some interesting sites, Including ones that claimed that Homosexuality was a Disease and a Chemical Imbalance.

Type this into Google:

[B]Homosexuality: a chemical imbalance? [/B]

as one of my university professors once said "Google can be used to proof anything, so don't use it to proof anything"

I believe that homosexual couples should be allowed to marry or at least have a civil union (with all of the same legal benefits/consequences, etc.), though religious figures should not be forced into ordaining such a union.

But just to play devil's advocate, the fact that something is naturally occurring does not necessarily make it 'normal' or 'right'.

The fact that homosexuality is 'natural' shouldn't be in question here, in my opinion. Obviously, no one is genetically engineered to be gay.

we were not talking about 'normal' or 'right', we were talking about 'natural'

'normal' or 'right' are subjective terms.

Originally posted by Fire
we were not talking about 'normal' or 'right', we were talking about 'natural'

'normal' or 'right' are subjective terms.

No, but it's obvious that his argument is that if homosexuality is 'unnatural', then it is automatically 'wrong'.

I'm not sure in what manner "natural" is being defined here though, in order to extrapolate to "wrong".
Occurring in nature outside of the human species? In which case it is still "natural", however things like complex language are not.
Occurring without external interference? In which case it is still "natural", but then one would argue things such as clothing and medicine are "unnatural" and should be extrapolated as "wrong".

Originally posted by Sorgo
Ouch....

I disagree. I don't see same-sex people having the ability to create a Baby. The creation of a life form signifies that Opposite-sex is natural.

Homosexual-Sex has been in question of being part of a Brain defect.

So... What makes Homosexuality natural again?

You referred to the act of marriage, which has nothing to do with what makes homosexuality natural.

It's two human beings indulging in the very human acts and emotions of sexual intercourse and attraction. These two things are natural, they are doing the unconventional by doing it with the same sex.

-AC

I know, that's worst than just thinking it is unatural, but the first one is wrong as well, if we can convince him of his mistake in the first part then everything is ok

No, no, no...

Although I don't care if they do it, I think it just isn't right. It IS Unatural.

Over five hundred thousand people think that Homosexuality is wrong. Do that many people think that Heterosexuality is wrong?

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
I'm not sure in what manner "natural" is being defined here though, in order to extrapolate to "wrong".
Occurring in nature outside of the human species? In which case it is still "natural", however things like complex language are not.
Occurring without external interference? In which case it is still "natural", but then one would argue things such as clothing and medicine are "unnatural" and should be extrapolated as "wrong".

Which is why his point, or at least choice of wording, is incorrect.