Originally posted by Bardock42
That doesn't sounds like opinion. That sounds like a claim to fact. Therefore it should be possible to refute if wrong.
No, that's exactly opinion. "Better" would be the source of that subjective assessment. It cannot be refuted, even a little. Nor can I change their opinions on which is better.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Yup, that'd be exactly what I was referring to.
I believe there is one more point missing...but that just about captures it.
I have to say that I agree with the acting part. Mark Hamill is just a truly horrible stage actor... or at least he was when he was doing Star Wars. I think we all know that Hamill is an absolutely fantastic voice actor now, but he was just awful in Star Wars. As much as I hate to say it, even Hayden Christensen was better in the prequel trilogy than Mark in the original.
Originally posted by -Pr-
wow. entitled to opinion and all that, but still... wow.i think i just threw up in my mouth a little.
It's similar to what I do when ever I read the OT wanking WITH PT bashing: I facepalm and think "Not another blankie syndrome."
Originally posted by The Nuul
Wait.....is someone hating on the original SW movies?Someone needs to ban his ass.
And to whom would that be referring to?
Originally posted by dadudemon
It's similar to what I do when ever I read the OT wanking WITH PT bashing: I facepalm and think "Not another blankie syndrome."
but you would accept that to some, the same criteria you use to illustrate the prequels' superiority is instead used to back the original trilogy (obviously not with special effects, but in other ways).