Originally posted by janus77No sold his best attacks? In round two Thors initial two strikes almost killed Rulk. Indeed because he was holding hands with Uatu before he one shot him 😐
Yes, sure... That explains why Rulk was no-selling OF Thor's best attacks before he even touched Thor.Rulk only attacked him after OF Thor had hit him several times, but one hit from Rulk opened OF Thor right up.
Originally posted by TheGodKiller
It was a retarded explanation nonetheless . Weightless doesn't equate to massless . Not to mention that they were talking to each other in space .
Originally posted by zopzopIt was a shitty loop hole. Rulk is a mess of a character as is but to use shitty loop holes just to embarrass Thor 😆
Rulk KOed a Watcher, killed the most powerful Elder of the Universe, trolled Dormammu and people are hung up about him bypassing Mjolnir's enchantment by using a loophole. Really? 😕
Originally posted by zopzop
Rulk KOed a Watcher, killed the most powerful Elder of the Universe, trolled Dormammu and people are hung up about him bypassing Mjolnir's enchantment by using a loophole. Really? 😕
They should have just left it at that , instead of trying to give a "scientific" explanation for the feat .
Originally posted by iceman24567
No sold his best attacks? In round two Thors initial two strikes almost killed Rulk. Indeed because he was holding hands with Uatu before he one shot him 😐
Originally posted by TheGodKiller
It was a retarded explanation nonetheless . Weightless doesn't equate to massless . Not to mention that they were talking to each other in space .
Originally posted by JayDaDonlol right? Something like "BLEAGH!" would fit better in that situation.
I loled at the Phuck. That is not the right response to getting bludgeoned in the head by a hammer 😆
Originally posted by TheGodKillerThe NOSE damn it. You hit your opponent in the nose. That's how this attack works in RL. Hitting someone on the forehead really IS retarded. And this chick's been trained to fight by Cyclops, Cable and Logan... Ugh...
The Almighty Headbutt isn't exclusive to the Odin family , it seems :
Originally posted by janus77I comprehend very well what you wrote its just more lowballing on your part typical since Thor is the topic. Again Rulk doesn't need to touch to absorb energy and even if he did who is to say he didn't absorb Thors energy on impact?
You don't score too highly on reading comprehension do you? Needless to say, your 'issues' are not the ones you wrote up there.A little perspective? we're discussing a "god" fighting a big red gamma-powered monster!
Originally posted by iceman24567
It was a shitty loop hole. Rulk is a mess of a character as is but to use shitty loop holes just to embarrass Thor 😆
Originally posted by janus77
As Rulk stated - whilst using the mallet to bash Thor's face in - the enchantment has a loophole in space, zero gravity.Ofcourse, he could have done what Savage Hulk did and use Thor as a glove to hold the mallet, but Rulk isn't so sophisticated.
It's retarded writing. Not to mention it straight up ignores the enchantment.
Originally posted by zopzopNah i meant he could have easily just beaten Thor without the hammer the shitty loop hole and the shitty explanation wasn't needed though he did beat Surfer up with his own board where they do that at
He humiliated Uatu, Dormammu and the most powerful Elder of the Universe. What makes Thor so special? I'd consider the previous three humiliations much more insulting to the intelligence than Rulk using some retarded "gravity loophole" to pummel Thor.
Originally posted by janus77
A little perspective? we're discussing a "god" fighting a big red gamma-powered monster!
Originally posted by TheGodKiller
If that's the case , then there shouldn't be a need to use RL physics to explain what the Big Red Bub did in his confrontation with the Goldilocks god , and then happily ignore another aspect of the physics-based explanation just to create a "WTF" moment in a comic issue .
It's only there to placate Thor-fans who can't distinguish the appearance of "a physics", from the real thing. Ofcourse the irony of Thor-fans complaining about the science is lost on them.
Originally posted by janus77
No, the "RL physics" are just decorative, they always have been. Why do you think so many "debates" in the vs forums come down to feats rather than H1... whatever's calculus and "science"?It's only there to placate Thor-fans who can't distinguish the appearance of "a physics", from the real thing. Ofcourse the irony of Thor-fans complaining about the science is lost on them.
Originally posted by TheGodKiller
They aren't decorative in this case , because they are being used ON-PANEL to explain how a particular character(Ross) has achieved a particular feat(swinging around Thor's hammer) , in a very faulty manner . Either properly understand the concept you use to explain a comic book (PIS)scene , or just let it remain at that , i.e a ridiculous(one of the many that were when it comes to Loebforce Rulk) feat performed just for creating a lame@$$ WTF-moment .
The explanation about zero-gravity is no better and no worse than the explanation of how Spiderman manages to cling to walls because he was bitten by a radioactive spider or how Magneto manages to "master" magnetism because he has a mutated "X-gene".
You may think you have a coherent handle on the "workings" of some comic-book stuff, but if you look into the matter, you'll realise that it dissolves into arbitrary actions and event-specific 'logic' pretty quickly.
This stuff is no good, this way only leads to religious nuttiness - the books (and comics) are written by humans of limited intellect, there's nothing more in them than the appearance of coherence.
Enjoy the way they build up characters and powersets, disregard things you don't like as PIS (Hulk getting strangled by a snake) and CIS (Surfer's approach to fighting Thanos) ... What you're left with is still just the appearance of coherent identities and powers. They sill don't make sense in their own terms (Hulk's ability to amp instantly to exponentially greater levels is cannon fact in one instance and then forgotten in another).