Character Ownage

Where was it stated that it was less durable because it was a "zombie"?

Must have missed that.

Originally posted by Galan007
No one is low-balling, abhi. We all recognize that the planet-benching feat happened, and it's uber as phuck... No denying that.

But in the very same comic, a Kryptonian dragon zombie overpowered Supes with just the tip of it's tail-- and then Supes went on to own a creature THAT much more powerful than himself with two, fairly meager, attacks (ie. a mountain-toppling punch, and an oil explosion.) Just came off a bit inconsistent, is all.

It's durability was shit because it was a zombie (Despite that never being said or hinted at). *Points to a non-canon Marvel comic as evidence*

😂

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
It's durability was shit because it was a zombie (Despite that never being said or hinted at). *Points to a non-canon Marvel comic as evidence*

😂

Didn't you try saying that Black Lantern Superman tanking kill shot attacks from Atrocitus, Sinestro, and Larfleeze should be applicable to regular Superman because his durability wasn't altered despite being "dead", Abhi?

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
It's durability was shit because it was a zombie (Despite that never being said or hinted at). *Points* to a non-canon Marvel comic as evidence*

😂

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chewbacca_defense

Originally posted by dmills
Oh damn. I'll join you after I make my coffee. This should be good.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Didn't you try saying that Black Lantern Superman tanking kill shot attacks from Atrocitus, Sinestro, and Larfleeze should be applicable to regular Superman because his durability wasn't altered despite being "dead", Abhi?

abhi is the greatest poster on this forum.

Originally posted by Galan007

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chewbacca_defense

Stating the EXACT happenings of the comic = "reaching"?

lol, how far does the BS go?

Also if the Dino's body was decaying it should have lesser durability imo, the dino should have a hole as big as superman when it smacked him. Inconsistent writers.

Originally posted by abhilegend
I must admit, your reaching in this thread was hilarious.

Superman is right, not-Superman is being a straight up hater who eats stillborn children.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Where was it stated that it was less durable because it was a "zombie"?

Must have missed that.

Sorry for the double post, butninam waiting for the day when superman puts his sheit together. Planet benching strength and stamina with proportional level durability.

Originally posted by Diesldude
Also if the Dino's body was decaying it should have lesser durability imo, the dino should have a hole as big as superman when it smacked him. Inconsistent writers.

That was the whole problem everyone else had a problem with maybe not with why you stated... I mean, the gay haters were saying.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Aren't you crying "BENDIS" over thanos' beatdown like all thanos fans? Go wipe your tears, you're losing your douchebaggery.

Originally posted by Galan007
Stating the EXACT happenings of the comic = "reaching"?

lol, how far does the BS go?

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
A little.

But on another note, the only two comics I read in the past 2 weeks are FF23 and AA8...

Bwahaha Bendis.

= me crying.

Abhi reads people as well as he reads comics. Illiterately.