Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Let's get serious here, if this was Superman, we wouldn't be questioning what was clearly stated and pointed out on panel.
Yeah, because people never nitpick over Superman's feats... ermm
Seriously though, the planet benching feat was nitpicked to **** by several people, all trying to come up with excuses for it, or to lessen it any way they could.
I honestly haven't read the Avengers books, so I can't say one way or another. What I will say is that I'm not about to let this thread get out of hand.
Originally posted by SevenShacklesFor the most part. They have ups and downs but are overall enjoyable. In the scan Kirsty basically made a deal with a girl who opened the box. She made her a cenobite believing thats better than dragging her too hell for opening the box. In the end she still took the innocence away from a young girl and made her a killing machine.
Wow that was an enjoyable read. What exactly is going on here? Are the hell raiser comics worth a read overall?
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
👆It seems every little story he's going to give a crazy feat to one character. So far he's got his new characters covered with Hype and Universe. Looks like it's Smasher's turn next, and then probably the Starbrand issue we'll get more into the team aspect. That crazy Hickman and the foundations he builds.
Actually got me excited for a comic ever since his Mad Celestial arc.
True.
Hickman has said that Thor will do something in the book that will get his fans high or something. 😱
Originally posted by HueyFreeman
For the most part. They have ups and downs but are overall enjoyable. In the scan Kirsty basically made a deal with a girl who opened the box. She made her a cenobite believing thats better than dragging her too hell for opening the box. In the end she still took the innocence away from a young girl and made her a killing machine.
Thanks. Any story arc in particular you might recommend for someone getting into it or is it one of those 'best to start from issue one' type deals?
Originally posted by PhilosophíaThis interpretation mirrors exactly that other time Philosophia disputed Superman Prime surviving the destruction of Earth-51 universe as it wasn't the entirety of its destruction Prime experienced but only the initial blast which caused a "chain reaction" that cascaded past the city, then continent, then outwards:
So it's ok to masturbate the feat [Hulk, Gladiator etc. have been brought in], but when somebody doesn't agree with the interpretation, they try to get the thread closed. Come again? Why would I even want this thread to be closed, since it's the best comic-related one [or was, when discussions like this were allowed] on this site.You seem to be under the impression that the two planets collided and this produced a big blast, which in turn destroyed the two Universes, with Hyperion being in the center of that blast, when that couldn't be further from the truth. No, what happened was that after the planets touched eachother, a cascade effect was produced which destroyed the two Universes.
http://i593.photobucket.com/albums/tt19/Max_Eisenhardt/multiverse4_zps39b456e1.png
Hyperion himself only experienced a small part of that cascade effect - the one that took place when the Earths smashed into eachother. He didn't experience it whole, since he was only present at the incursion point, and not at the expanding cascade effect which destroyed both Universes. Flash fact: Hyperion isn't Eternity.
Prime didn't experience it whole, since he was only present at ground zero where the chain reaction started. After all, Prime isn't Eternity. So while some are accusing him of trying to diminish what Hyperion survived, there should be no cause to suggest he's being inconsistent.
. . . . . . . .
Originally posted by carver9
Or it could have happened off panel. It was stated he held them apart. By the way, do you have a link for what you just posted Philo?
Originally posted by ODGSo I come in hoping to read some nice character ownage and I see a discussion has happened. PR has already put the law down for everyone else but ODG what SBP did has no correlation to what Hyperion did. Don't use this is a reason to get a personal debate point across for another comicbook character.
This interpretation mirrors exactly that other time Philosophia disputed Superman Prime surviving the destruction of Earth-51 universe as it wasn't the entirety of its destruction Prime experienced but only the initial blast which caused a "chain reaction" that cascaded past the city, then continent, then outwards:Prime didn't experience it whole, since he was only present at ground zero where the chain reaction started. After all, Prime isn't Eternity. So while some are accusing him of trying to diminish what Hyperion survived, there should be no cause to suggest he's being inconsistent.
. . . . . . . .
