Character Ownage

Started by StiltmanFTW5,121 pages

Originally posted by One-Punch
[b]

[b]Superman, owned by a table.

"MMMGOTTHHAGH!!!" [/B]

😆 😆 😆

More, please.

Originally posted by kgkg
Why can't I quote Phil? Been A while how u been Phil?
It's due to my username..forum's gone haywire.

I'm fine, a little bit less free time lately, but it's all good. You? Why the long leave of absence?

Originally posted by -Pr-
You started this shit, so don't act shocked.

👆

Bend over and enjoy it, abhiman.

Originally posted by Philosophía
It's due to my username..forum's gone haywire.

I'm fine, a little bit less free time lately, but it's all good. You? Why the long leave of absence?

You can quickquote you, but you can't quote you. Edit takes you to the advanced edit page too. Anything that takes you to another page in regards to you just isn't happening. Just like boys escaping from Carver's dungeon.

Another ownage of supes without it being a low-showing. Heck its a seriously good showing for Supe's durability
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/scale_super/11114/111147153/3623255-7219009473-36231.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/scale_super/11114/111147153/3623254-6944146747-36231.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/scale_super/11114/111147153/3623253-5200371671-36232.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11114/111147153/3623252-9187013194-36232.jpg

Another ownage withoutbeing a lowshowing
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11114/111147153/3623283-8751655863-super.jpg

Originally posted by Surtur
I at least like that the writers in interviews acknowledged that they f*cked up in their portrayal of Superman. From the electrified manhole cover to random laser pistols causing him pain. Wind dragon made him look like a b*tch too. They also tried to give an in story reason with the "World of Cardboard" speech.

I remember superman laughing off a disintegration gun which had just before vaporized half of a metal bridge in ST:TAS, so he has good showings as well

Originally posted by One-Punch
😉

Superman tries and fails to push a [b]two ton pummel and gets smashed by it. He nearly gets Jimmy, his best friend, killed.

Owned by two whole tons... [/B]

A punch from someone like Spiderboy would kill him.

There's enough showings that this isn't low for superman. He is honestly meta level now

Yamcha would blitz an army of Supermen.

honestly I would be more shocked if Superman didn't have any low showings seeing how many appearances he has made in comics. If we go by averages then those showings wouldn't even make a blib how he is regularly portrayed. But hey....cool to hate on characters

Originally posted by "Id"
Jimmy giving 0 phucks of his super pal condition and working that camera to earn his commission.
😂

He probably masturbated later to those photos of Superman's corpse.

Originally posted by -K-M-
honestly I would be more shocked if Superman didn't have any low showings seeing how many appearances he has made in comics. If we go by averages then those showings wouldn't even make a blib how he is regularly portrayed. But hey....cool to hate on characters

It's amusing in all honesty.

Originally posted by -K-M-
honestly I would be more shocked if Superman didn't have any low showings seeing how many appearances he has made in comics. If we go by averages then those showings wouldn't even make a blib how he is regularly portrayed. But hey....cool to hate on characters

Why didnt you say this when abhi goes on a posting spree downgrading Thor and Surfer? Just curious.

i said the same thing when the Thor low showings were posted. Done it a few times even during avengers vs xmen. I also didn't jump on the Odin sucks bandwagon either. Didn't see the silver surfer stuff? Where was that? I admit I don't read every thread.

This ties in to a big reason why I don't debate much on here. Comics are not consistent and it's only getting worse. I actually bitched when superman lifted the earth for 3 days feat as those type of stories are hardly how the character is going to be portrayed all the time. Writers to make their stories interesting will give them low showings to create drama as not always a great story if the hero easily succeeds with everything. Then on battle boards those showings will be held against them while the high showings will be held by the fans of the character and rarely is a healthy balance achieved

You would be hard pressed to find me bashing any character. Except Michael pointer....he can die

Originally posted by carver9
Why didnt you say this when abhi goes on a posting spree downgrading Thor and Surfer? Just curious.

I haven't done anything of that regard. One or two posts of ownage scans but that's it.

Now I'm actually going to do it as people here are really digging low showings of characters.

👆

Originally posted by -K-M-
i said the same thing when the Thor low showings were posted. Done it a few times even during avengers vs xmen. I also didn't jump on the Odin sucks bandwagon either. Didn't see the silver surfer stuff? Where was that? I admit I don't read every thread.

This ties in to a big reason why I don't debate much on here. Comics are not consistent and it's only getting worse. I actually bitched when superman lifted the earth for 3 days feat as those type of stories are hardly how the character is going to be portrayed all the time. Writers to make their stories interesting will give them low showings to create drama as not always a great story if the hero easily succeeds with everything. Then on battle boards those showings will be held against them while the high showings will be held by the fans of the character and rarely is a healthy balance achieved

You would be hard pressed to find me bashing any character. Except Michael pointer....he can die


This isn't even surprising any more. The forum always had a strong hate for Superman and Surfer fans go ballistic upon a single ownage scan posted.

Just like Bran did here. And the rest of the forum joined in.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=382350&pagenumber=2019

mmm

Isnt the whole purpose of an ownage thread to troll? You have to come in here with foreknowledge that "hey somone i like probably got owned". Not seeing the griping. What would be cool if we had a " "good story thread" celebrating actual good stories instead of context laden feats

Problem with this thread is people see these scans and try to use them in a debate not knowing the context. That's the members fault, not the thread though.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Isnt the whole purpose of an ownage thread to troll? You have to come in here with foreknowledge that "hey somone i like probably got owned". Not seeing the griping. What would be cool if we had a " "good story thread" celebrating actual good stories instead of context laden feats

The purpose is to troll the people getting owned yes. It's not meant to be an outlet for passive aggressive shots at other posters. Which is of course exactly what was happening recently and I think we pretty much all know it.

I mean I honestly don't care, however I only bring it up because the mods have asked us not to discuss posters in this thread..which is kinda difficult if said posters come in with a specific agenda due to being butthurt. Since even now we're discussing it instead of just posting ownage scans. It's sort of like putting down a hamburger in front of a starving man and telling him not to eat it. Perhaps the better thing would be just to remove the temptation in the first place. Otherwise sooner or later he's going to sink his teeth into that burger and I don't think anyone would blame him.