HUL
Re: Re: Re: Re: Character Ownage
Originally posted by Philosophía
It's funny how you have dozens of low showings saved to post out of Surfer-fan frustration, and you're telling me I take this too seriously.I wouldn't waste that amount of effort on Surfer.
Also, Byrne-era is a designate for his powerlevels around that period, not his comics themselves. It's easier to say that, than John Byrne-Louise-Simonson-Dan Jurgens-Marv Wolfman etc.- era, you see.
Originally posted by Philosophía
You just know Carver will copy/paste them, context will be explained to him, he will vanish, then post the same thing in other threads, acting ignorant about the context.He's been doing this for years on other topics.
Originally posted by Philosophía
It's funny how you have dozens of low showings saved to post out of Surfer-fan frustration, and you're telling me I take this too seriously.
I wouldn't waste that amount of effort on Surfer.
Also, Byrne-era is a designate for his powerlevels around that period, not his comics themselves. It's easier to say that, than John Byrne-Louise-Simonson-Dan Jurgens-Marv Wolfman etc.- era, you see.
Originally posted by Philosophía
You just know Carver will copy/paste them, context will be explained to him, he will vanish, then post the same thing in other threads, acting ignorant about the context.
He's been doing this for years on other topics.
And yet your friend Abhi constantly ignores context even after its explained to him just to either make superman look good or make another characters look bad, and you other friend biensala/Rao has entire photobucket collections of low showings, well, half low-showings and half what he claims to be low showings while they are simply out of context and not actual low showings.
And yet you never utter a syllable about them. Hypocritical bias much?