Originally posted by DarkSaint85
It's the last sentence I guess I was focussing on but I love writing.If Hulk has a low showing, we can attribute it to PIS, or CIP. Gamma maths. He's constantly holding back.
Same with Superman. Mental blocks and all that.
Surfer has his whole pacifist thing going on. Sure there are scans showing he can be ruthless, but there are a lot of showings where he cries about it all.
Thor? He has the warrior mentality, and whilst he's no Einstein, neither is he stupid like a Rhino. So either it's PIS, or he doesn't have the abilities.
So that's three reasons for a low showing. CIP, PIS, or just sheer inability.
With Flash, we know he has the ability to dodge a punch. If the puncher is slower than him, then it can't be CIP....it's literally travelling slowly to his face. Holding back mentally means he's actually letting himself be punched, and not doing anything about it.
Hence my conclusion that it's PIS.
Which again, in some cases, is fine. It's the implication of the full capacity rule and anything under it being pis. What that turns into in threads is that literally every Flash feat is perfectly acceptable to use at anytime and anything worse is regarded as inadmissible. Which you know, whatever.
But what I'm saying is I don't see why it's held to a different degree than strength/other powers in this respect, which is something you seemed to touch on and excuse speed from the same amount of fingers being pointed at it.
All of the powers should be held to the same degree of scrutiny. Speed shouldn't get an execption just because it has numbers attached to it. Which I realize without numbers it makes it harder to judge, but it's the absolute best number that's accounted for more often than not.
For example, all of Flash's feats are acceptable, and anything under that is argued against because of those feats. Yet lowly characters like Superman have to use their best feats to bring up their lowly averages. If he was held to the same degree as Flash, every other feat would be used to prove his best feat is the level he's operating at, and anything under that is acceptable if not frowned upon to not use. Yet, he (Superman) has to use his best feats to bring up his average. I'm sure you can see the difference here.
Superman is impossibly strong going by average.
Superman is infinitely strong going by the leeway Flash is given.
You could likely get away with posting one feat in a Flash thread at this stage in time and most people wouldn't even question that he wins based on that one feat. The discussion doesn't become a discussion because that one page is fact, and he will be operating at that level in the thread. That seems to be the consensus on Flash.
I just don't see why speed is held to a different degree in comics. I never said he wasn't fast, or comparable to real life boxers (I used that to show reactions can differ, not that ****ing Catwoman can tag him or whatever else people think I used it for. I also compared speed differing to walking and running, guess I also compared him to a human too). I'm saying that speed, like everything else in the world is subject to variation to answer your initial problem with it. The only thing that doesn't really, is durability. Yet nobody has an issue averaging out durability.
Anyway, I realize Flash is quick and I'd go so far as to even admit he's speedy, but my problem doesn't stem from his actual feats. It's that he's treated differently than every other character on the forum and people will make reasons as to why it's different. If you want to take Flash's best feats as the average for whatever reason, then you should be consistent enough to not try and change it when it comes to another power. If Flash is operating in attosecond levels, then I want that same person to have Superman being abstract levels in that same thread.
That is my point if you can understand it.