Seriously now, what was so wrong about the fight ?
Hulk has always been depicted as being stronger. When an angry Hulk grabs Thor arm and hand, he should have no problem hitting Thor with Mjolnir.
I don't see the problem. Thor is strong, but he was taken by surprise bye a pissed off Hulk.
Not only that, but I also think - not sure, but still - that Hulk wielding Mjolnir will do more damage than Thor wielding Mjolnir. Hulk is stronger, so he should do more damage.
When Thor hits Hulk with Mjolnir, Hulk feels it, and is in pain. But when Hulk hits Thor with Mjolnir, it should hurt Thor more than Hulk, because Thor is not so strong or durable as Hulk.
Originally posted by psycho gundam
it 's true. hulk and thor fights were always clash of titans type affairs, so showing a "flashback" of hulk just lolstomping thor like that was bs.thor's damage soak was almost in the negatives in that depiction.
According to the writer, Thor was not intended to be wounded as bad or something like that. He blamed it on the artist apparently. He should have checked the final result of his issue like any writer should because that shit was just inexcusable.
And he also apparently didn't have Thor say shit like "Gurgle." in his original script.
I have a hard time believing all that. I mean he didn't even read the final copy of his own issue?
Originally posted by Kid Kurdy
Seriously now, what was so wrong about the fight ?Hulk has always been depicted as being stronger. When an angry Hulk grabs Thor arm and hand, he should have no problem hitting Thor with Mjolnir.
I don't see the problem. Thor is strong, but he was taken by surprise bye a pissed off Hulk.
Not only that, but I also think - not sure, but still - that Hulk wielding Mjolnir will do more damage than Thor wielding Mjolnir. Hulk is stronger, so he should do more damage.
When Thor hits Hulk with Mjolnir, Hulk feels it, and is in pain. But when Hulk hits Thor with Mjolnir, it should hurt Thor more than Hulk, because Thor is not so strong or durable as Hulk.
I don't think you have actually read their fights.
It's the same bull that writer was spewing. The Hulk has always been shown as stronger etc. Do people even read the comics or just watch the animated garbage?
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusWhats wrong with thor bleeding some..?.. 😕 I mean its not like he is invulnerable, and the hammer is more dense than his skin..its like if you got hit with a hammer you would bleed too.. 🙁
According to the writer, Thor was not intended to be wounded as bad or something like that...
Originally posted by nicamarvin
Whats wrong with thor bleeding some..?.. 😕 I mean its not like he is invulnerable, and the hammer is more dense than his skin..its like if you got hit with a hammer you would bleed too.. 🙁
Bleeding some? He bleed a lot. Thor is not invulnerable but his way too durable for that too happen in four hits and have his nose split in 1. His been pounded on by Adamantine, Uru weapons etc. of beings in Hulk's league. Heck the simple fact he has tanked being repeatedly pounded on by the Destroyer whose superior to the Hulk and is made out of Uru is all I need as evidence.
Originally posted by Kid Kurdynah man, if this is a throwback to something that happened way back when, it wouldn't go down like that.
Seriously now, what was so wrong about the fight ?Hulk has always been depicted as being stronger. When an angry Hulk grabs Thor arm and hand, he should have no problem hitting Thor with Mjolnir.
I don't see the problem. Thor is strong, but he was taken by surprise bye a pissed off Hulk.
Not only that, but I also think - not sure, but still - that Hulk wielding Mjolnir will do more damage than Thor wielding Mjolnir. Hulk is stronger, so he should do more damage.
When Thor hits Hulk with Mjolnir, Hulk feels it, and is in pain. But when Hulk hits Thor with Mjolnir, it should hurt Thor more than Hulk, because Thor is not so strong or durable as Hulk.
you missed the time when hulk and thor were deadlocked for an hour (?) like a statue it seems. i guess hulk is ultimately stronger, but not enough to just dummy thor like some weak feeb.
Originally posted by psycho gundam
nah man, if this is a throwback to something that happened way back when, it wouldn't go down like that.you missed the time when hulk and thor were deadlocked for an hour (?) like a statue it seems. i guess hulk is ultimately stronger, but not enough to just dummy thor like some weak feeb.
Thor's strong and tough but not much more than a base-level Savage Hulk.
Originally posted by janus77Ridiculously wrong on too many levels to take seriously.
that stalemate doesn't really mean much when you consider how easily Hulk does increase in power, exponentially.Hulk's known for fighting ding-dong battles with Thing, does that make Thing almost the equal of Hulk? of course not, just means that Hulk wasn't stepping it up... it's also a fact that Hulk was at a far weaker level back then (as Hulk/Banner states in Nightmare Island that Savage Hulk was just him in the infancy of his power).Thor's strong and tough but not much more than a base-level Savage Hulk.
Tom B.
FAN: I would like to thank you for standing up to the Thor fanboys that decided they would spam you over the recent Thor vs. Hulk matchup.
TB: Make no mistake, though, I love most Thor fans. Same thing with Hulk fans. It's crazy paranoic fans who start to forget this stuff is all entertainment and who are either abusive to the creators or displaying an insane amount of entitlement that I don't have much patience for. But most Thor fans are cool, intelligent people, like most all of our fans.
FAN: I know you already answered a ton of Thor/Hulk complaints, but I really think you need to read that story before commenting. This wasnt a loss, this was an epic embarrassment. Thor has never looked remotely that pathetic. *gurgle*
Tom B: Well, it's not like the outraged thor fans gave me a chance, all storming over here en masse to post variations of the same questions over and over. You didn't get to see the breadth of the crazy I got from those guys, as I only answered a few of them, the most sensible ones. if you come to my backyard looking for a fight, you're going to get one.
FAN: Why can I be fine with Thor containing the Odin-Power? He's Odin's SON. He has a connection to that power. He's the son of 2 off the charts cosmic beings. That's why. For him it's logical. For Rulk it's a joke.
TB: Why? You don't know who the Red Hulk is the son of right this moment. I mean, you like who you like, but this argument doesn't seem to hold water.
Rulk was drawing on the odinpower? Are you trying to win a no-prize? How you let those bumbling fools McGuiness and Loeb humiliate Thor to the extent that they did is beyond reproach and you know it.
TB: So it's all right to belittle and insult real people, but let's not allow a fictional character to lose a fight. Strange priorities.
yesterday
FAN Someone asked about the odin-power. First Rulk wouldn't draw off the Odin-Power, for while it does have a basis in Cosmic power, it is also mystical in nature. Also the Odin-Power has survived ragnarok b4, and Odin then proceeded to use it to bring bac
TB: Forgive me, but i think that the creators get to decide just what the Red Hulk can and cannot do. So if we say that the Red Hulk could draw upon the cosmic aspects of teh Odin-Power than he can. I don't understand how you can be fine withteh idea that Thor can contain such a power within himself, but the Red Hulk can't.