Batman a peak human doing metahuman feats?

Started by DarkCrawler3 pages

First anti-hero in comics. ✅

Originally posted by spetznaz
Read my words carefully .....I know you are dyslexic, but that shouldn't affect your reading and/or comprehension.
Other characters, for example Wolverine and Quicksilver, and simply characters. Nothing more. No literally genius went into them.

I said Wolverine was simply a character. And that no profound ideological encapsulation went into them.
End of story.

I did not say he was 2-dimensional ....in fact in other places I have said that Logan is quite the character (and I adore him ...just that certain people tend to hy....erm ...anyways). However he is nowhere near the same level of complexity and intricacy of thought as the Hulk, or Superman, or Batman.

Now, just to digest this a bit for you. This doesn't mean that Logan doesn't have a rich history. He does. But it is not in the same philosophical vein as the three.

At the end of the day Wolverine is simply a character. A character that is many times well written, and many other times mass-marketed, but still a character. And a character that has an interesting back story.
However you will not see a discussion on Wolverine in a university's philosophy course.
Not by a long shot.

comprendez vous?

nor will u see batman.
know you are dyslexic, but that shouldn't affect your reading and/or comprehension

thats actauly one of the main things it does effect, but not a big deal I read all the time so no problem for me but ever one in a while I will miss comoprehened some thing

Originally posted by spetznaz
That is true. However Wolverine8888 will never admit it when he is wrong.
Namor was the first anti-hero in Marvel ....easily.

I said first true. that what is stated in the back of the (x-men official) guide. I not saying namor was not the first anti-hero but it says wolverien the first true anti-hero it says there was other heros at the tiem considered anti-hro but not truely anti-heros. also ur sight is not official though I am not saying it wrong.

I think Punisher is also considered an true anti-hero...he appeared before Wolverine also.

I don't think that the writers of X-Men official guide really researched everything. How can they say what is anti-hero, and what is not?

Namor is true anti-hero. All the definitions of an anti-hero go on him.

actauly he dident last tiem I check he apeared in a spiderman comic in the 80"

Originally posted by DarkCrawler
I think Punisher is also considered an true anti-hero...he appeared before Wolverine also.

Big P is definitely an anti-hero. And a very good one at that.
Seriously think about it ....the dude's modus operandi is to maim and/or kill, yet the politically correct censor types have never been able to touch him.
The guy is simply on a vengeance mission.

Castle is the man.

Originally posted by wolverine8888
actauly he dident last tiem I check he apeared in a spiderman comic in the 80"

Actually, he did...

Punisher: Amazing Spider-Man #129 February 1974.

Wolverine: Incredible Hulk #180 October 1974.

February comes before October.

Originally posted by spetznaz
Big P is definitely an anti-hero. And a very good one at that.
Seriously think about it ....the dude's modus operandi is to maim and/or kill, yet the politically correct censor types have never been able to touch him.
The guy is simply on a vengeance mission.

Castle is the man.

ya I life him a lot he my dads favorit guy. I like Fury more then punisher though

Originally posted by DarkCrawler
Actually, he did...

Punisher: Amazing Spider-Man #129 [b]February 1974.

Wolverine: Incredible Hulk #180 October 1974.

February comes before October. [/B]

hey go argue with marvel lol. there the oens that stated it. though was punisher a hero the first comic he was in wasent he a bad guy?

Originally posted by wolverine8888
actauly he dident last tiem I check he apeared in a spiderman comic in the 80"

Punisher - Amazing Spider-Man #129 FEBRUARY 1974

Wolverine - The Incredible Hulk #180 NOVEMBER 1974

I said I was wrong

Originally posted by wolverine8888
hey go argue with marvel lol. there the oens that stated it. though was punisher a hero the first comic he was in wasent he a bad guy?

He thought that Spider-Man was a bad guy.

why repost it?

Originally posted by DarkCrawler
He thought that Spider-Man was a bad guy.

I see I see well then some one needs to chang the back of that book

Originally posted by wolverine8888
nor will u see batman.

Wolverine8888 ....when will you learn that if I say something I have checked up on it. You are saying that Batman is not to be found in a university philosphical course, and thus calling me a liar for saying he will.

Silly you.

I can name a couple, but let me just put the one where I have been in and seen the course.

The university is Notre Dame (you know ...THE Notre Dame).
The professor's name was Tom Morris ....Dr. Tom Morris, phD.
The book is : Superheroes and Philosophy
Truth, Justice, and the Socratic Way

In fact there is another book that came out: Batman Unmasked: Analyzing a Cultural Icon by Will Brooker.

Just shut up if you don't know what you are saying Wolverine8888.

As for your dyslexia .....that is ok, and many people actually function perfectly with it. Thus it is not a problem.
In fact if you noticed I stopped making fun of you .....kind of silly to be honest with you.
However do not call me a liar again. If I say Batman is in university philosophy courses (and for that matter even in PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS LECTURES), do not say that is not true when you have nothing to back it up with.

Originally posted by wolverine8888
I see I see well then some one needs to chang the back of that book
Handbooks are cluttered with mistakes.

Namor was anti-heroing when Punisher's granddaddy hadn't finished high school. Namor is older then AUNT MAY.

http://img367.imageshack.us/my.php?image=namorparty14rx.gif

AUNT MAY! (Well, so is Wolverine though)

Originally posted by spetznaz
Wolverine8888 ....when will you learn that if I say something I have checked up on it. You are saying that Batman is not to be found in a university philosphical course, and thus calling me a liar for saying he will.

Silly you.

I can name a couple, but let me just put the one where I have been in and seen the course.

The university is Notre Dame (you know ...THE Notre Dame).
The professor's name was Tom Morris ....Dr. Tom Morris, phD.
The book is : Superheroes and Philosophy
Truth, Justice, and the Socratic Way

Just shut up if you don't know what you are saying Wolverine8888.

As for your dyslexia .....that is ok, and many people actually function perfectly with it. Thus it is not a problem.
In fact if you noticed I stopped making fun of you .....kind of silly to be honest with you.
However do not call me a liar again. If I say Batman is in university philosophy courses (and for that matter even in PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS LECTURES), do not say that is not true when you have nothing to back it up with.

wtf I enevr said u were a liar I simply doubted u see batman in one. also if u look hard enough there a quite a few college that study comics I would not be surprized to find other character as well

Originally posted by DarkCrawler
Handbooks are cluttered with mistakes.

it not a hand book

Ok.

Batman beat namor before...