Originally posted by exanda kane
Yet your deliberatedly being a dickhead now. My argument speaks for itself and stop being childish, so next time I suggest to keep quiet.And Mist, despite your child-like mannerisms, you have a point about the ex-jedi. Whoever said that any jedi who leave the Order is a dark jedi is wrong. Infact Jedi that leave the Order for reasons other than mass murder can usually still be called Jedi, they just do not act on behalf of the Council.
This will be my last post with regards to this. Im not interested in derailing threads. Yes I was deliberately being a dickhead, but why not when I have to put up with people like you?😱
Now now, provoking and name calling will only instigate matters, so maybe before you start telling me how to act, you should watch yourself as well.
Originally posted by exanda kane
Yes, their all generalisations; do not argue with these points otherwise I will flame you.
Now, didnt you just tell me to stop acting childish? 🙄
Now, I see Rex has pointed out that I was right, so I see no need for me to post in here again with regards to the topic 🙂
Oh I see. It's like that is it...
Well Mist, I have to say I did like you. Then I asked you to stop going off topic and stop taking everything everybody says literally, so you decided to be awkward. Fine you can do that. But please dont act all high and mighty about things, your the childish one.
So back on to the topic that has aready run its course and dried up.
And Rex; your a waste of space. I'd rather steal candy from XYZ Jedi...
Originally posted by exanda kane
Oh I see. It's like that is it...Well Mist, I have to say I did like you. Then I asked you to stop going off topic and stop taking everything everybody says literally, so you decided to be awkward. Fine you can do that. But please dont act all high and mighty about things, your the childish one.
[B]So back on to the topic that has aready run its course and dried up.
And Rex; your a waste of space. I'd rather steal candy from XYZ Jedi... [/B]
And you're an idiot. Stop the childishness or I'll go get Ush.
You were wrong, as horrible as that may seem. 🙄
How childish...
You ARE wrong. There is a great difference between a Dark Jedi and a Sith Lord. Dark Jedi is just a Jedi using the Dark Side. Like Jerec, Desann, etc. A Sith Lord uses the Sith teachings and powers of the Dark Side, and knows much more of the Dark Side than a simple Dark Jedi does, and is relatively more powerful.
Now, I'm going to go get Ush, because you're just being stupid...
Originally posted by Captain REX
How childish...You ARE wrong. There is a great difference between a Dark Jedi and a Sith Lord. Dark Jedi is just a Jedi using the Dark Side. Like Jerec, Desann, etc. A Sith Lord uses the Sith teachings and powers of the Dark Side, and knows much more of the Dark Side than a simple Dark Jedi does, and is relatively more powerful.
Now, I'm going to go get Ush, because you're just being stupid...
Sigh... argumentative debate is one thing, but you know full well that calling Rex, a veteran member, a mod and one of my personal buddies in these areas, a 'waste of space' is hardly going to mind me to see you as the victim, Exanda. That sort of comment we can very much do without.
And whilst it is true that the average moviegoer will not see the difference, and whilst the term 'Dark Jedi' doesn't actually have any form of official description...
... it is simply the application of common sense that you are not a Sith unless you are in the organisation called the Sith. Therefore the distinction between Dark Siders (of which there could theoretically be many) and Sith (of which there can only be two, in PT times anyway) is a valid one to make.
GL doesn't actually have any truck with Dark Jedi because he clearly sees Dark Siders as exceptionally rare, and heavily implies that the only Dark Siders in his creation are Sith.
But in the wider continuity of the EU there is no need to be so strict.
Woah. I go away for one bleeding day and this is what happens?
So this is why I don't usually try and give constructive comments that were useful, because I have a bunch of idiots feel attacked.
1. My argument was never aimed at Mist apart from one single comment; which was "stop trying to make an argument out of nothing". Someone was just trying to inform someone else about the different definitions and Mist unnecessarily 'corrected' him and brought the whole flaming thread down by going off topic. And as Ush correctly said, there is no official defintion for such a thing.
2. Ush, I dont see why you should be victimising anyone, especially me, since this was quite a stable debate until Rex misinterpreted my joke, hence the rather large 😱
3. I'm sorry CobbleR, if this particular non standard variation of the second person singular or plural possesive pronoun, written for the need of haste, offends you.
Now despite this seeming incredibly pathetic mess, can we reach for the light and carry on passively?