Second EU Nation Moves To Ban Gay Marriage

Originally posted by soleran30
for one we cannot really go and say same sex couples because that is biased against hetero couples so a new definition of couple needs to be defined.

Whats the time period for it to take affect or are there any? What tax pieces do they get compared to hetero couples...............who is then to tell me I don't have a civil union with my dog and he is entitled to my estates and I claim him as a dependant. I realize some of that is corny however its these same types of things that will get brought into play.............lawyers love to play semantics and lawyers write the laws.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Marriage is a human right not a heterosexual privilege.

Shouldn't heterosexuals have more rights than homosexuals according to evolutionary theory? Think about it. Those who have a better chance of procreating through sexual intercourse, are definately more evolved than those who can not...correct? And nature also seems to produce more hetero's than homo's..so this means that the hetero gene is superior to the homo one..right?

So it all just boils down to "survival of the fittest." In this case, heterosexuals have a better chance of surviving and passing on their taxable inheritances for the following reasons:

1) Nature produces more heterosexuals than homosexuals.

2) Heterosexuals have the evolved ability of producing more "taxable" offspring.

Damn..finally found an argument that Modern Evolutionary theory can be used to support.

Fin

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Marriage is a human right not a heterosexual privilege.

Now I wouldn't say that. But if it is a right it should be a human right...for everyone.

Originally posted by Eis
How is it biased against heterosexual couples?

because of how laws are worded today and how they might explain a union................the definition is what is most critical for this..........is there a time period, what are the benefits (health, tax), so my point is that whatever is done for civil unions or whatever you want to call them we need to make sure they are clearly explained and encompass all unions (relationships) not just same sex or hetero.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Shouldn't heterosexuals have more rights than homosexuals according to evolutionary theory? Think about it. Those who have a better chance of procreating through sexual intercourse, are definately more evolved than those who can not...correct? And nature also seems to produce more hetero's than homo's..so this means that the hetero gene is superior to the homo one..right?

So it all just boils down to "survival of the fittest." In this case, heterosexuals have a better chance of surviving and passing on their taxable inheritances for the following reasons:

1) Nature produces more heterosexuals than homosexuals.

2) Heterosexuals have the evolved ability of producing more "taxable" offspring.

Damn..finally found an argument that Modern Evolutionary theory can be used to support.

Fin

Not really.

a) is your arguement flawed
and
b) just because evolution is a scientific truth (pretending that it is) doesn't mean that huan culture has to behave according to it.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Shouldn't heterosexuals have more rights than homosexuals according to evolutionary theory? Think about it. Those who have a better chance of procreating through sexual intercourse, are definately more evolved than those who can not...correct? And nature also seems to produce more hetero's than homo's..so this means that the hetero gene is superior to the homo one..right?

So it all just boils down to "survival of the fittest." In this case, heterosexuals have a better chance of surviving and passing on their taxable inheritances for the following reasons:

1) Nature produces more heterosexuals than homosexuals.

2) Heterosexuals have the evolved ability of producing more "taxable" offspring.

Damn..finally found an argument that Modern Evolutionary theory can be used to support.

Fin

Originally posted by soleran30
because of how laws are worded today and how they might explain a union................the definition is what is most critical for this..........is there a time period, what are the benefits (health, tax), so my point is that whatever is done for civil unions or whatever you want to call them we need to make sure they are clearly explained and encompass all unions (relationships) not just same sex or hetero.

Originally posted by Eis
Um, why are those who have a better chance of procreating through sexual intercouse more evolved than those who have less chances?

Well..according to Darwinian theory..those who have a greater chance of producing healthy fertile offspring, are the more evolved species.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Well..according to Darwinian theory..those who have a greater chance of producing healthy fertile offspring, are the more evolved species.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Well..according to Darwinian theory..those who have a greater chance of producing healthy fertile offspring, are the more evolved species.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Not really.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Well..according to Darwinian theory..those who have a greater chance of producing healthy fertile offspring, are the more evolved species.

however that shouldn't define rules for a civil union. If thats the case burn all invalids or disabled people before they can create more devil spawn 😈

Originally posted by Eis
Didn't know that...
So I guess that makes me an undeveloped being.

So Im not an undeveloped being?! 😱

No you aren't...although I don't really know you, you might be...better check your local priest to be sure 😐

Originally posted by Bardock42
No you aren't...although I don't really know you, you might be...better check your local priest to be sure 😐

Originally posted by Eis
Im not a christian 😛
and christianity's banned here anyway...

really? Where are you from?

Originally posted by Bardock42
really? Where are you from?

Originally posted by Eis
from? or where I live?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Let's do both...just for fun.

Gotta watch out for those stalkers, you know?

Originally posted by Eis
How about? No. 😛
My nationality and my current location are strictly confidential. ✅

Gotta watch out for those stalkers, you know?

Dammit...and I was soo close.

I know 😮‍💨
But seriously, how hard can it be? How many countries is are there that christianity is illegal?

Originally posted by Eis
I know 😮‍💨
But seriously, how hard can it be? How many countries is are there that christianity is illegal?

UI don't know. to be all honest I didn't know there were any.