Originally posted by _Sanctuary_
You know, I think maybe I can argue this one myself 😐
Sorry, id din't realize you where defending PETA, All I saw was a Words, resembling the text given to all adults in any "Penuts" Cartoon and in the middle of it PETA.
I'm not on any body's side.
But I can be for the right price. 🙂
Originally posted by Koala MeatPie
Sorry, id din't realize you where defending PETA, All I saw was a Words, resembling the text given to all adults in any "Penuts" Cartoon and in the middle of it PETA.I'm not on any body's side.
But I can be for the right price. 🙂
Originally posted by _Sanctuary_
No it doesn't, just because humans think they rule the earth doesn't mean they do, people want to think they are in control of the world but they are not..
And I'm sorry but I don't see any lions doing things to deer so they will have to go through immense pain for days... Animals eat other animals it is how the world works..
There are other ways of testing things, and animals can react differently to humans anyway making the results unreliable. (THALIDOMIDE!)
Animals rights is an incorret term! To have rights you have to know you have rights and others around you have rights, duh!
There are OTHER ways of testing that are both humane and reliable!
In my post I said nothing about animals eating other animals or shit about lions, tigers, or bears...Oh My!
I was arguing that animal testing has it's benefits. Sure there are animals whom they test on and it turns out the information isn't reliable to humans, but those are few and far between because they use animals who have a physiology similar to humans.
Without animal testing there would be thousands, if not millions, of people who should be dead right now. The lives of a few animals for the lives of many humans...it seems like a fair trade off.
Originally posted by KENobi™
In my post I said nothing about animals eating other animals or shit about lions, tigers, or bears...Oh My!I was arguing that animal testing has it's benefits. Sure there are animals whom they test on and it turns out the information isn't reliable to humans, but those are few and far between because they use animals who have a physiology similar to humans.
Without animal testing there would be thousands, if not millions, of people who should be dead right now. The lives of a few animals for the lives of many humans...it seems like a fair trade off.
Originally posted by _Sanctuary_
I know you said nothing about lions and deer, I was just to lazy to type out my opinions all over again and copied and pasted 😆
There are other ways of testing (dermalogically testing products, and all sorts of other new things) and animal testing doesn't always work.. It is not a few animals it is millions... Trading lives is never right, I would rather die than use a product tested on animals.
Do you have asthma? Need to take asprin? Ever had surgery? If yes to any of those questions...you have been connected to animal testing by proxy.
Originally posted by KENobi™
Would you rather they tested on humans? Or would you prefer that we didn't have these life saving medications and techniques?