Rapscallion
Senior Member
Sorry for stealing your idea. 🙂
And yeah the books came first.
As for the list...
8. The Hogwarts in the first to has a different geography from the last two. (look at hagrids hut).
9. Despite some talented, oscar quality actors like Maggie Smith and Ralph Fiennes, they all seem bored with the material.
10. They somehow made Dobby annoying.
11. Not enough of Fred and George
12. Richard Gambon plays the polar opposite of what Dumbledoor's really like. ( He gets violent when Harry's name comes out of the Goblet of Fire).
13. there will be four directors for the first five films so there is no singular definitive vision.
14. John Williams's score was one of the worst of his career, but was still probably the strongest aspect of the series.
15. John Williams left the project after three films taking his score, and the only above average aspect of the films with him.
16. Bad special effects om the first two.
17. Cutting out too much from the books.(they could have made the movies longer or could have been written in a less fragmented exagerated way.)
18. Harry Potter is too literal a book to be translated to film with no allegorical meaning, we're just watching a bunch of random magic tricks. In the books we get the sense that some form of meaning will be presented in the end, while in the movies, they just are empty pixels with no soul.