Babysitters Rape 12-week Old Baby

Started by Victor Von Doom15 pages
Originally posted by Syren
Doesn't 'raped' tend to mean intentionally penetrated without consent? Genuine query...

Penile penetration without consent, which means a woman can never rape.

Originally posted by Syren
Doesn't 'raped' tend to mean intentionally penetrated without consent? Genuine query...

Also, the man's sentence is in no way just. Please don't tell me you're serious.

Well buit it certainly is a question that has to be considered...I mean...the way the penetration...well you get the picture.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Penile penetration without consent, which means a woman can never rape.

Is that the actual definition? What are other types of sexual intercourse without consent called then?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Is that the actual definition? What are other types of sexual intercourse without consent called then?

Rape is the intentional penetration of the vagina, anus or mouth of another person with the penis, where the other person does not consent, and the person penetrating does not reasonably believe that they consent.

The mouth was added in the reforms of 2003, where they also decided not to extend rape to include penetration by object.

That is covered by a separate offence of 'Assault by penetration', which is the same as rape, except the penetration can be with any part of the body or other object, and the penetration must be sexual. This offence does not apply to the mouth, for obvious reasons.

Learning a lot here, thanks. So I was right about this;

Originally posted by Makedde
This is sick. The artical doesn't say anything about how the child was raped. If the baby was raped digitally, she can recover, however, if not, her insides would be so messed up I doubt she would ever have cildren herself.

If the child was 'raped', then she was penetrated.

Originally posted by Syren
Learning a lot here, thanks. So I was right about this;

If the child was 'raped', then she was penetrated.

Correct.

Although you can't really rely on the media to worry about legal definitions when they have papers to sell by way of shock tactics.

Originally posted by Syren
Learning a lot here, thanks. So I was right about this;

If the child was 'raped', then she was penetrated.


Yeah, I mean I was rather certain of this but (back when I didn't know what VVD just explained) I wasn't sure if it couldn't have been ...well another kind of penetration.

It's difficult to comprehend, I know 😬

But the one thing that crossed my mind, although I'd much rather it hadn't, was that tiny orifices {rear} can be penetrated.

what the f**K is wrong with this world today a 12 week old baby hell no this is wrong

Back to square one again...

Which is arguably why these situations are never examined and dealt with properly.

Because people tend not to read the entire thread? 😄

Originally posted by Syren
Because people tend not to read the entire thread? 😄

That's a microcosm of what happens in real life.

Clever analogy, then? Yay me 😂

You didn't mean it though did you, dear.

Let's be honest with ourselves. It doesn't count.

Poor Syren...let me quote Homer's Brain for you

"That's the only smart thing you ever said and no one was here to hear it"

You are supposed to say something along the lines of "D'oh" now.

Just to make that clear the "and no one was here to hear it" part in this case means "and it doesn't count".

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
You didn't mean it though did you, dear.

Let's be honest with ourselves. It doesn't count.

I did though, thanks for the vote of confidence. Jeez, does everyone actually think I'm some kind of dolt? 😕

No offense (note that) but you don't exactly give off an air of intelligence. You refer to yourself as quite intelligent but your posts continually suggest otherwise, then you play the victim when others pick you up on it.

It's getting kind of tired.

-AC

Originally posted by Syren
I did though, thanks for the vote of confidence. Jeez, does everyone actually think I'm some kind of dolt? 😕

Maybe not a dolt, but you might need to fine-tune your irony meter.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
No offense (note that) but you don't exactly give off an air of intelligence. You refer to yourself as quite intelligent but your posts continually suggest otherwise, then you play the victim when others pick you up on it.

It's getting kind of tired.

-AC

I don't give off an air of intelligence? Fine, I think you mean I don't parade an extensive knowledge of everything, which I don't. I'm quite intelligent though, regardless of your unwelcome opinion.

VVD, noted.