I am from around seattle have been a hawk fan forever and i know they will win because....
Better Quarter Back
Better Running Back
Better O line
Better Wide Recievers(As a whole they do have Hines ward but over all Seahawks have better)
I dont really know now after watching how dominant the Seahawks D is so ill say its a toss up between the two.
I think the Hawks Offense will be too much even for Polamalu and the other guys I say Hawks win 27-14
Yeah so theyve got lucky...
Carson Palmer out for season and on the first play a 60 yard pass so they got lucky
They are lucky to have made it past the colts they couldnt hold there lead and got lucky when Vanderjact missed and hes the most accurate kicker the the history of the NFL
The Broncos looked like theyve never played a game of football in their lives.
Out of all the teams this is the ideal matchup for the hawks the WORST in the AFC VS. The BEST in the NFC
i wouldnt call Pitt the worst in the AFC.. Im an avid seattle fan and I think its going to be a tough matchup although sorta rediculous seattle is a 4 point dog. Pitt has been playing extremely well. Especially Big Ben he has matured a ton since last year simply stoping pitt's run game no longer garuntees anything. It should be a great game for sure, and I hope Seattle wins, but once again pinball you are making yourself and seattle fans look ignorant with your comments.. also dexx is prolly gonna want this in the NFL thread.
OK let me say this
You say that the Steelers run game is no longer really reliable correct?
The same thing happened against the panthers, Steve Smith is more of a threat than any Steeler reciever and Delhomme is a better Q. Ben has done good lately, Seattle will come out just like they did against Carolina and play the pass. Im not saying this is going to be easy. Remember that everybody was doubting the Hawks last week and the absolutly murdered the Panthers it was never a contest.
How am I making all seahawk fans look ignorant? Im just voicing my oponion
Oh yeah and I meant Pittsburg was the worst coming into the Playoffs and in the Seahawks best interest this is the ideal matchup for them.
i dont think pitt was the worst going into the playoffs dont be fooled bye the seeding #, it is after all just a number. Id rather seattle play any team but Indy if it wasnt Pitt because I think Pitt is such a tough team. I didnt say anything bad about the Pitt run game either, I said they no longer have to relly just on the run, panthers had to relly on just the pass and to only 1 WR, Pitt has 2 quality RB's and 3 pretty good WR's and a good TE it gives Seattle WAY more to worry about. The Jags only beat seattle early on because holmgren abondoned the run game really really early when alexander was averaging around 5 yards a carry anyway.. seattles a much better team then they were then, and the jags are worse and were the worst team in the playoffs on the AFC side by far.
Originally posted by PINBALL
Yeah so theyve got lucky...
Carson Palmer out for season and on the first play a 60 yard pass so they got lucky
They are lucky to have made it past the colts they couldnt hold there lead and got lucky when Vanderjact missed and hes the most accurate kicker the the history of the NFL
The Broncos looked like theyve never played a game of football in their lives.
Out of all the teams this is the ideal matchup for the hawks the WORST in the AFC VS. The BEST in the NFC
First of all there were some key calls that should have been in the Steelers favor that went in the Colts favor (Namely when Polamalu got that interception with good field position and it was challenged and deemed incomplete). And yes, Bettis ****ed up proceeded by Vanderjagt, but it was not a matter of luck that Pittsburgh beat the Colts.
Originally posted by PINBALL
Better Wide Recievers(As a whole they do have Hines ward but over all Seahawks have better)
This guy's entire analysis cracked me up, but this point in particular had me rolling.
"No hands" Jackson vs. Ward - uh, let me think on this one...after further review, advantage to Ward by a few light years.
Engram vs. Randle El - Randle El. This is probably where you'd disagree. Fine. Just don't retract your statement after one of El's punt return TD.
Jurevicious vs. Wilson - split
Warrick vs. Washington - this is not that important of a matchup as the other ones. Besides, Warrick's been a real demon against the Steelers in the past, let me tell ya 🙄
You have to include the tight ends as far as the receiving game goes. Miller is a much better target than Stevens for their respective offensive systems and thus, more valuable.
Nothing against the Seahawks - they're a good team and all - but to predict a blowout when 7 of their wins were against SF, SF, STL, STL, HOU, ARZ, & ARZ is borderline psychotic.
Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
I wish the Seahawks best of luck. Is their first superbowl so their fans deserved to celebrate.
If the Steelers won, it would be their first since 1979. That would put Steelers fans 30 and under in the same boat as Seahawks fans as far as never experiencing a Super Bowl win (or being old enough to appreciate it).
And last time I checked Steeler fans flood all fields cross-country while Seahawk fans voted 80% in 2001 they they could care less if the Seahawks moved to the NFC, so I think Steeler fans would appreciate a win juuuust (if not 1000x) a bit more...
Originally posted by botankus
This guy's entire analysis cracked me up, but this point in particular had me rolling."No hands" Jackson vs. Ward - uh, let me think on this one...after further review, advantage to Ward by a few light years.
Engram vs. Randle El - Randle El. This is probably where you'd disagree. Fine. Just don't retract your statement after one of El's punt return TD.
Jurevicious vs. Wilson - splitWarrick vs. Washington - this is not that important of a matchup as the other ones. Besides, Warrick's been a real demon against the Steelers in the past, let me tell ya 🙄
You have to include the tight ends as far as the receiving game goes. Miller is a much better target than Stevens for their respective offensive systems and thus, more valuable.
Nothing against the Seahawks - they're a good team and all - but to predict a blowout when 7 of their wins were against SF, SF, STL, STL, HOU, ARZ, & ARZ is borderline psychotic.
im a big seattle fan but i pretty much agree with your overall assesment.
Jackson is much improved and stepped up HUGE vs the Skins but he is not even close to Hines Ward.
Randle El is very dynamic and with his Special Teams play is prolly a little more valuable than Engram but that is a close one.
Jurvecivious over wilson is no split though, JJ takes that one easy the man had a huge year having to step up to the #1 WR role and did a hell of a job doing it.
Id prolly go with DJ Hacket over Warrick as far as their 4th WR I know it may not be listed that way, but DJ saw 3 times the time warrick did this year and way out played him, either way going to a 4th WR is not important except for injuries.
On the TE I really think highly of Stevens but Miller has been a great target for Big Ben as well. Stevens had slightly better numbers but not a huge deal I'd call this one a draw.