Steelers or Seahawks

Started by Smasandian8 pages

Yeah, especially if the team is from the East like Buffalo, or New England. That's a long flight to get to Seattle.

But nothing beats Arrowhead. I also like watching Seahawks games because they play in rain and on grass, so its all muddy and shit. Really fun to watch. Another reason why I hate the Superbowl being played in warmer states. It's stupid, football is meant to be played in the bad weather.

Indeed, Smasandian. For once, I'd like to see the Super Bowl played in an outdoor cold weather city.

The main reason they can't though is because it would take away from the half time show. 🙁

I concur, I'd like to see one in a real football stadium in cold temperatures.

Only problem, the teams wouldn't stop bitching about it, especially if the "home" team was from Florida or Arizona...err, that last one's not gonna happen.

Originally posted by botankus
I concur, I'd like to see one in a real football stadium in cold temperatures.

Only problem, the teams wouldn't stop bitching about it, especially if the "home" team was from Florida or Arizona...err, that last one's not gonna happen.

Yeah, its also unfair to teams with outdoor stadiums like the Giants, Bills, New England that they can never have the superbowl.

Naysayers say that's it unfair to have teams play in non optimal conditions. Botankus hit it on the head with teams from Florida and Arizona (dude, its Denis Green, he's so awesome in the playoffs)

Im sorry, but that's bullshit.

It's okay to have them play in the playoffs in snow and ice, but as soon as they reach the superbowl, they cant?

yes!, i'm with you guys on that one, i was thinking that chicago would be an awesome place for the superbowl...its an open stadium in an awesome sports city, but no, these pricks in the NFL have set it up for domes and the places where they do have open stadiums are florida, and arizona, and L.A..in fact i think the next 3 superbowls are in miami, phoenix, than tampa bay, yea phoenix, because when i think of football, i think of the dessert 😐

Yeah, they're is only a few place where they can have a superbowl.

I dont like it because its not fair to the cities that live in winter. Why shut them out of soo much money because of a stupid ideal that you need ideal conditions to play a game in.

Look at the Grey Cup (CFL), they play in November and sometimes its cold, snowy or anything.
Probably the best game ive seen was Toronto and Edmonton in Hamilton (city beside Toronto). The whole area was blanketed in snow, making the game awesome to watch.

Why when it gets to the Super Bowl it has to be sunny but any other time of the season it could be raining shit and they'll still play so I think any stadium should be able to host the Super Bowl.

Originally posted by DiamondBullets
Don't be sore. If that "controversial" TD by Roethlisberger didn't count, the Seacocks still woulda lost. Just cuz you lost 50 bucks to one of your co-workers, doesn't mean it was a questionable win.

Hell yeah they would still have lost.The seahawks if they want to blame anybody for their defeat,they should be pissed at stephens because he dropped two critical passes that would have turned the game in their favor if he had caught those.Also if the seahawks really want to balme anybody they should also blame holmgren because he made some very questionable and conservative play calling decisions towards BOTH the end of the first half and towards the end of the game where if he had not been so conservative running the ball in the final two minutes of the game,the game could have turned out differently.so the hawks cant blame it all on the refs,they had their chances to win it but they blew it plain and simple.

and that would be you smasdina who doesnt know what they are talking about and knows very little about football so I will return the favor and ignore your posts as well.you live in denial that peyton manning choked big time. 😆 😆 😛

Originally posted by DiamondBullets
There was absolutely nothing wrong with the officiating. It was fair and perfectly down the middle. Just cuz your team lost: "OH MY GOD!, THE REFS MUSTA SCREWED'EM!" please.......

Dude are you trying to be funny? it was not fair at all.But the seahawks were poor losers blaming the ofiicials for not winning the game.They could have won the game if stephens had not dropped two crucial passes that would have made a difference in the game probably and if they had not been so conservative in their play calling at the ends of the half running the ball when they should have been passing.the refs made some horrible calls against the seahawks but unlike the steelers did when they overcame some horrible calls that went against them in the colts game,they were able to overcome them because they had resiliancy unlike the seahawks.

you realise you just made 2 posts that were almost indetical 7 minutes a part, for a thread almost a month old.

Originally posted by Mr Parker

and that would be you smasdina who doesnt know what they are talking about and knows very little about football so I will return the favor and ignore your posts as well.you live in denial that peyton manning choked big time. 😆 😆 😛

I guess I dont know anything.

I guess Manning did choke, I guess the line getting beat by run-stuffers, the recievers not getting open, and the defense letting in 20 points in the first quarter which allowed the Steelers to play thier type of football. Or what about Vanderjagt, i guess Manning told him to miss the field goal.

Manning didnt choke, the whole team choked. Football is a team sport, you know those 10 other guys on the field beside Manning.

Also, when did I not retort to your posts?

This thread should not be posted on anymore the game was 3 weeks ago. Im going to post one final thing, here it is..........The Seahawks were cheated out of a Super Bowl.

This is a tyte poster advertising the Superbowl.

That's great, DiamondBullets.