markie
calgon take me away
Originally posted by maham
that wud only prove that they r hypocrites as they say they hav religious freedom but they don't let u follow ur religion n wear scarfs
The afghani people must be hipocrits because they say their form of islam is tolerant but they want to kill that guy. They probably let him go due to internationnal presure but the clerics said they would get people too kill him.
http://worldnews.about.com/od/centralasia/a/abdul_rahman.htm The international community is placing pressure on Hamid Karzai's government to intervene on Rahman's behalf. Meanwhile, prominent clerics have declared that should the Afghan courts bow to Western pressure and release Rahman, "the people to pull him into pieces so there's nothing left."
Rahman's was turned into the police by his parents who had suspected him of converting.
Some are trying to get Rahman declared insane, a solution that would prevent him from having to stand trial and save his life. However, even that might not save Rahman from the actions of extremists bent on seeing the "God's justice" is done.
This the case is clearly the product of a system where rules and spheres of influence remain unclear. The Afghan constitution upholds the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but it also states that no law can contradict Islam. Afghanistan's president, Hamid Karzai, is pro-Western, but the judiciary is largely controlled by Islamic clerics.
They are goinng against the koran by wanting to kill him because there's not supposed to be any compulsion in religion, or has that been abrogated? If not would you explain how you can aprove of it?