NAMBLA

Started by KharmaDog27 pages

Re: Introducing..NAMBLA!!!

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Okay guys..seriously, let's talk about NAMBLA...this thread has diverged off into other subjects like homosexuality, pedophilia, molestation..and things that have nothing to do with the topic of the thread. Please guys, try to stay on topic.

They are on topic. Here is your original post:

Originally posted by whobdamandog
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man-Boy_Love_Association

Seeing how there's been a great resurgence of people posting in the

"Homosexuality..Chosen or Genetic thread," I though it might be interesting to see what you guys thought about these guys.

And let's try to keep this thread clean, and not bash anyone.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
this thread has diverged off into other subjects like homosexuality

Which is fair because your original motivation to start this thread was (in your own words), "Seeing how there's been a great resurgence of people posting in the "Homosexuality..Chosen or Genetic thread," I though it might be interesting to see what you guys thought about these guys. " You already made the Homosexual link. And you continue to press your anti-homosexual beliefs.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
pedophilia, molestation

How can one not talk about these when discussing NAMBLA?

Originally posted by whobdamandog
..and things that have nothing to do with the topic of the thread. Please guys, try to stay on topic.

Pot...Kettle...Black.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
He is trying to compare homosexuality to criminal activity.

well than he's just a passive/aggressive twit, isn't he?

Originally posted by Darth Jello
well than he's just a passive/aggressive twit, isn't he?

Wow! and I thought he was just nit. 😉

i like to change up my vocab, what would you have preffered?

Originally posted by Darth Jello
i like to change up my vocab, what would you have preffered?

All is as it should be. 😄

Whobdaman, see which one of these following questions you can answer....

A. Can you tell me the exact size of a Dodge Viper's engine?

or....

B. What brand of masquera does Ryan Seachrist wear?

Originally posted by DiamondBullets
Whobdaman, see which one of these following questions you can answer....

A. Can you tell me the exact size of a Dodge Viper's engine?

or....

B. What brand of masquera does Ryan Seachrist wear?

i know neither....does that make me a eunic? 😕

Originally posted by Lana
No, homosexuality is having an attraction to people of your gender.

Not molesting little kids.

If I have an attraction to a younger boy, And I am a Male,

THAT is Homosexuality blended with Pedophilia.

Originally posted by Lörd Sorgo
If I have an attraction to a younger boy, And I am a Male,

THAT is Homosexuality blended with Pedophilia.

and if you are attracted to a little girl, then that is heterosexuality mixed with paedophelia.

now please explain the significance of either? or better yet, PLEASE tell me why its somehow better to be a heterosexual kiddie raper.

Originally posted by Lörd Sorgo
If I have an attraction to a younger boy, And I am a Male,

THAT is Homosexuality blended with Pedophilia.

Pedophilia is the paraphilia of being sexually attracted primarily or exclusively to prepubescent children. There are two types of pedophiles; situational pedophiles, who have a general preference for adult partners, and are almost exclusively heterosexual in their adult orientation, and structural pedophiles who have a sexual interest in children of prepubertal or early pubertal age regardless of gender.

Why are there so many people making excuses for pedophiles?

Hey Whob,

Originally posted by DiamondBullets
Whobdaman, see which one of these following questions you can answer....

A. Can you tell me the exact size of a Dodge Viper's engine?

or....

B. What brand of masquera does Ryan Seachrist wear?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Why are there so many people making excuses for pedophiles?

Who is making excuses for pedophiles? The point I am making is that pedophiles have a sexual interest in children regardless of gender. Male pedophiles who molest male children do so because they have more access to male children than female children.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Who is making excuses for pedophiles? The point I am making is that pedophiles have a sexual interest in children regardless of gender. Male pedophiles who molest male children do so because they have more access to male children than female children.

I'm sorry, I was referring to you.

It's the people who seem to equate pedophilia to homosexuality or heterosexuality as if it was just another type of sexuality. The truth is, these people pray of children because they can have power over them. That is why it does not matter if it is a male or female child.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I'm sorry, I was referring to you.

It's the people who seem to equate pedophilia to homosexuality or heterosexuality as if it was just another type of sexuality. The truth is, these people pray of children because they can have power over them.

while you are certainly on the right track, im sure there are other motives besides power, depending on the sexual devient. but thankfully you and a handful of others have actually researched the topic rather than flood it with uneducated homophobic nonsense.

another motive could be a manifestation of a kind of peter pan complex, which is what people SUSPECTED of michael jackson (i said suspected AC, and in the past tense, so please dont run with it).

whatever the drive is though, its connection to heterosexuality/homosexuality is irrelivent. people fail to understand that because they are repressed homosexuals who cant confront themselves, so they choose to live a lie and demonize their own kind as we have seen here. never will they make the obviouse connection with the point of my last post. not because they dont understand, but because they dont want to. willful ignorance.

Found this on google answers:

The Question:
Assuming we have three 18 year old men. One who is sexually attracted
to members of the opposite sex. One who is sexually attracted to
members of the same sex. And one who is sexually attracted to
children.
If all three men have NEVER acted on there desires would they all
three be viewed as "normal" to the majority of scientists who study
human sexuality?
Is it as a biological error or are they all three a common occurrence in
human history and thus natural, or both?

The Answer:
Hello and thank you for your question.

The leading scientific opinion on the 'homosexuality' side of your
question comes from the American Psychiatric Association and the
American Psychological Association, since it is Psychiatrists and
Psychologists who are the medical scientists that study sexual
behavior:

"Psychologists, psychiatrists and other mental health professionals
agree that homosexuality is not an illness, mental disorder or an
emotional problem. Over 35 years of objective, well-designed
scientific research has shown that homosexuality, in and itself,is not
associated with mental disorders or emotional or social problems.
Homosexuality was once thought to be a mental illness because mental
health professionals and society had biased information. In the past
the studies of gay, lesbian and bisexual people involved only those in
therapy, thus biasing the resulting conclusions. When researchers
examined data about these people who were not in therapy, the idea
that homosexuality was a mental illness was quickly found to be
untrue.

"In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association confirmed the importance
of the new, better designed research and removed homosexuality from
the official manual that lists mental and emotional disorders. Two
years later, the American Psychological Association passed a
resolution supporting the removal. For more than 25 years, both
associations have urged all mental health professionals to help dispel
the stigma of mental illness that some people still associate with
homosexual orientation."
Is Homosexuality a Mental Illness or Emotional Problem?
http://www.apa.org/pubinfo/answers.html#mentalillness

Pedophilia, on the other hand, is considered by these scientists to
constitute a mental disorder:
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0890420254/103-6353385-0797436?v=glance
"The American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)
criteria for Pedophilia (302.2) are:
A. Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent, intense sexually
arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual
activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years
or younger);
B. The person has acted on these sexual urges, or the sexual urges or
fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty;
C. The person is at least age 16 years and at least 5 years older
than the child or children in Criterion A."

"The DSM is the standard classification of mental disorders used by
mental health professionals and provides clear, objective descriptions
of mental illnesses, based upon scientific research. Pedophilia is
categorized in the DSM-IV-TR as one of several paraphilic mental
disorders. The essential features of a Paraphilia are recurrent,
intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors that
generally involve nonhuman subjects, children, or other non-consenting
adults, or the suffering or humiliation of oneself or one’s partner.

"An adult who engages in sexual activity with a child is performing a
criminal and immoral act and this is never considered normal or
socially acceptable behavior.

"Darrel A. Regier, M.D., M.P.H., Director, American Psychiatric
Association’s Division of Research states,
'there are no plans or processes set up that would lead to the removal
of the Paraphilias from their consideration as legitimate mental
disorders.'"

American Psychiatric Association Statement:
Diagnostic Criteria for Pedophilia
http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/apa_statement_jun03.htm

There is a view, I would call it an extreme and minority position,
that the categorization should possibly change:
"Some mental health professionals attending an annual APA convention
May 19 in San Francisco proposed removing several long-recognized
categories of mental illness - including pedophilia, exhibitionism,
fetishism, transvestism, voyeurism and sadomasochism - from the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)."
Psychiatric Association Debates Reclassifying Pedophilia
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=%5CCulture%5Carchive%5C200306%5CCUL20030611c.html

Search terms used:
homosexuality disease psychiatric
"Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" pedophilia 302.2

Thanks again for bringing us your question
Google Answers Researcher
Richard-ga

^ great post. Thanks

Originally posted by PVS
and if you are attracted to a little girl, then that is heterosexuality mixed with paedophelia.

now please explain the significance of either? or better yet, PLEASE tell me why its somehow better to be a heterosexual kiddie raper.

And then why don't you tell me why its any worse to be a young dog raper...

And then why don't you tell me why its any worse to be a stick your wanker in the corpse of a young boy raper..

🙄

You're deluded PVS. There are definitely different levels equated to "obscene" and "unlawful" behavior..the law recognizes this, society recognizes it. Why can't you?

Why is raping a young boy even more perverted than raping a young girl?

Because not only is one raping an innocent young child..but they are also going against the very nature of of the act of sex, which was designed for the purpose of procreation between a man/woman.

Originally posted by whobdamandog

Why is raping a young boy even more perverted than raping a young girl?

Because not only is one raping an innocent young child..but they are also going against the very nature of of the act of sex, which was designed for the purpose of procreation between a man/woman.

so you are actually telling me that raping a child of the opposite sex goes with the law of nature.

thank you

now i know for a fact that you're batshit