NAMBLA

Originally posted by PVS
a debate works like this:

person one brings up points to support their argument and/or refute the points of the opposition.

person to in turn will either bring up counterpoints and/or add something new to the discussion.

this goes back and forth and that is a debate.

what i see here is me refuting your points, you ignoring that and repeating yourself. its a cop out, and im not playing along

sorry :/

I perpetually have to repeat a fact because it seems to not be sticking with you properly.

Your refuting was pathetic, at the least and you came out with some shoddy theory that because Pedophilia is administered, Homosexuality is crossed out.

Which is honestly bullshit.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
he won't answer because he doesn't think it matters to his point of view.

on the contrary
he knows that it does matter.

oral sex is an unnatural act. the mouth is used for eating and breathing.
thats what nature dictates. by no law of nature is the penis to enter the oral cavity, be it male or female.

the bottom line is whob wont answer because he's a coward.
a gutless coward with absolutley no testicular fortitude.
the truth is he would accept oral sex from a woman, and
be eternally grateful regardless of the fact that he would have
to pay for it, and pay heavily, which blows his argument right out of the water....heh 'blows'

so thats why he wont answer.
he has no balls

oh and to answer your nonsensical question whob, no.
i would not accept oral sex from a man, since i am not attracted to men. however i have had and will always accept oral pleasure from an attractive female whom i deemed worthy, and vice versa. so i guess im a freak of nature. but unlike you i have balls

Originally posted by Lörd Sorgo
Your refuting was pathetic, at the least and you came out with some shoddy theory that because Pedophilia is administered, Homosexuality is crossed out.

Which is honestly bullshit.

i guess you can go on putting words in my mouth if it helps you feel victorious. i think its pretty pathetic though.

well, im not going to resort to quoting my own posts,
so believe what you want, have a coke aand a smile and stfu 🙂

Originally posted by PVS
i guess you can go on putting words in my mouth if it helps you feel victorious. i think its pretty pathetic though.

well, im not going to resort to quoting my own posts,
so believe what you want, have a coke aand a smile and stfu 🙂

Just a quick summary of the bullshit I previously read.

have a coke aand a smile and stfu 🙂

What glorious typing!

Originally posted by Lörd Sorgo
have a coke aand a smile and stfu 🙂

What glorious typing!

ZOMG!!!!111111 TYPO!!!111!!!!! LOLZ!!!! ROFLMAOZZZZZZ!!!!!1111

derp 🤓

Originally posted by PVS
on the contrary
he knows that it does matter.

oral sex is an unnatural act. the mouth is used for eating and breathing.
thats what nature dictates. by no law of nature is the penis to enter the oral cavity, be it male or female.

the bottom line is whob wont answer because he's a coward.
a gutless coward with absolutley no testicular fortitude.
the truth is he would accept oral sex from a woman, and
be eternally grateful regardless of the fact that he would have
to pay for it, and pay heavily.

so thats why he wont answer.
he has no balls

He's a coward, no doubt. But, he apparently has answered. He has children. But, does he have a wife? Are they married? Did he have this kid before they got married? Do they go to church on sunday? Every sunday? Do they have sex in multiple positions, or just missionary? What does "experience" imply? Do you have pictures of yourself with these kids? How about one with the wife? How boring could sex be with whob if he refuses to do anything that isn't approved by the bible?

On top of all that, he still can't answer how his religious beliefs should be considered when deciding the rights of another human being? Why is someone elses sexuality and life any of his buisness?

So yes, on the contrary, he KNOWS they matter...but we know that he doesn't think the answers matter...because he still argues just as irrationally. So, since we all know they matter, why doesn't he?

Originally posted by PVS
oral sex is an unnatural act.

however i have had and will always accept oral pleasure from an attractive female whom i deemed worthy, and vice versa. so i guess im a freak of nature. but unlike you i have balls

Right...it's unnatural, but natural enough for you...

Originally posted by PVS
ZOMG!!!!111111 TYPO!!!111!!!!! LOLZ!!!! ROFLMAOZZZZZZ!!!!!1111

derp 🤓

Quit while you're ahead.

It'll save you a ton of embarrassment.

yeah, you sure owned me by pointing out a typing error. i bow before the greatness 🙄

as usual...you missed the bus

Originally posted by Makedde
Right...it's unnatural, but natural enough for you...

as usual...you missed the bus

I missed no bus, maybe you should explain yourself better.

Originally posted by PVS
yeah, you sure owned me by pointing out a typing error. i bow before the greatness 🙄

as usual...you missed the bus

as usual...you missed the bus

Don't make assumptions.

I wasn't talking about the spelling error.

It seems you've missed the bus, PVS.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man-Boy_Love_Association

Seeing how there's been a great resurgence of people posting in the

"Homosexuality..Chosen or Genetic thread," I though it might be interesting to see what you guys thought about these guys.

And let's try to keep this thread clean, and not bash anyone.

Tell how this has anything to do with the homo thread. I'd like to know what u gotta say....

Originally posted by Lörd Sorgo
That's nasty.

And to whoever said Homosexuality and Pedophilia are two different things are very wrong.

They are usually associated.

I'd like to know how they are associated and please don't give me your opnions. Show me some facts please.

I wanna hear what you gotta say....Keep the bias to a minimum please.

Originally posted by whobdamandog

Not until a "sex ring" of underage boys brought intense media scrutiny in Boston in the closing weeks of 1977, and police raided the Toronto-area gay newspaper The Body Politic for publishing an article by Gerald Hannon titled "Men Loving Boys Loving Men" did the subject of adult-minor sex garner enough attention to prompt the formation of a group like NAMBLA.

..........

Immediately following the Stonewall riots, some U.S. and Canadian gay rights organizations advocated the abolition of age-of-consent laws, believing that gay liberation was to apply to all gays, not just those above a certain age. [12] The Gay Activists Alliance (GAA), a group which splintered from the Gay Liberation Front in December of 1969, opposed age-of-consent laws and hosted a forum on the topic in 1976. In 1972 Chicago's Gay Activists Alliance and New York's Gay Activists Alliance jointly sponsored a conference that brought together gay rights activists from eighty-five different gay rights organizations and eighteen states. [13] At the conference these approximately 200 activists coalesced to form the National Coalition of Gay Organizations, and drafted and passed a "Gay Rights Platform" [14] which called for the "repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent."

Ok if that is all true I will say right now that that's seriously wrong. It's wrong in every sense of the word. But, I wouldn't associate this with most homosexual men. Also, is that Wikipedia? It is usually an ok place to find general info on a topic, but there usually is a lot of other things left out. Think outside the box, ya know?
Also, men rape girls at a young age too. Much more than they rape little boys, why isn't that on your to fix list?

.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
It depends on what you consider homosexuality. A side from the obvious reasons I've given in the previous post, it's quite apparent to anyone who has studied various species within the animal kingdom, sexual behavior in animals, can not be equated to sexual behavior in humans.

A black widow eats her mate after she becomes impregnated....

Various species of of animals will consume some of their young after they have been born...

Dogs will from time to time attempt to eat their own defication..

Are we to equate these behaviors to that of humans...again bud..I don't think so.

From a Christian perspective however, God obviously didn't "create" these" types of behaviors..however..he does allow for them to happen. All of the "killing" and "unnatural" behavior that one can see present within the world today is a result of "sin."

As I stated before, we are not animals..despite what you have been indoctrinated with in your highschool/university science class, human beings are distinctly different from the animal kingdom. If we were animals, then we wouldn't possess those unique characteristics such as rationalization, creativity, love, compassion, mercy..among many other unique traits. If you really believe yourself to be an animal, then I truly pity you my friend.

The above nonsense will be addressed in a separate thread.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Certain behaviors deemed as "sexual" are generally based on societal standards, not on the actual function of stated body part.
The lips do not have a sexual function my friend. One's behavior
or use of a certain body part, does not automatically equate that body part as having a sexual characteristic.

Once again, you seem only to see coitus as sex. Sexuality is far more encompassing than that. Also, any feature that entices or attracts a partner in a sexual manner is performing a function.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
😆 Oh I'm quite "experienced" my friend. I actually have a child of my own, and unlike some adults on this forum, I'm certain that he understands that there are certain places..where his mouth is not supposed to go..😆

The fact that you are a parent means nothing except for the fact that there is one more really messed up child out there.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
According to PVS..😉

It's funny that you cannot give a yes or no answer, and that you actually have to try and twist the words of another member to try and seem smart.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Sounds like you've had some experience in this area...😉

Actually no, I am heterosexual, but would it matter if I did? You seem to miss, or avoid, the point completely. I think your discomfort regarding the topic of homosexuality may be a clue to your own latenet homosexuality. Thow doth protest too much. Once again you make yourself look like a dumbass.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
okay boys and girls I'm done with this thread..

And for those of you who didn't already know..

A man who engages in sex with young boys..is a homosexual..

😆

Fin

You are done because you cannot take the heat, you cannot answer anyone's questions and you realize that you are fighting a losing battle. But you will be back when the heat dies down to try and get the last word. You are a fool, you can't help yourself, perhaps god made you that way.

Am I the only one who's getting sick of the

"Nuuuurh, you're gay."
"Nuh-uh, you're gay."
"LOL HOMO"
"STFU, you like it like that."
"Sounds like you want to give it to me."

bullshit?

Originally posted by FeceMan
Am I the only one who's getting sick of the

"Nuuuurh, you're gay."
"Nuh-uh, you're gay."
"LOL HOMO"
"STFU, you like it like that."
"Sounds like you want to give it to me."

bullshit?

I agree, but in some cases I do think that there are one or two members who's "hate on" for homosexuals is a bit strange.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
I agree, but in some cases I do think that there are one or two members who's "hate on" for homosexuals is a bit strange.

Truthfully, whob is dead-on in some of the stuff he posts. I just don't get in the middle of it because that's a one-way road to a headache.

I blame the children!!!

http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news0100/chatgirl.html