NAMBLA

Started by Alpha Centauri27 pages
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
I'm sure lesbians would disagree.

Ironically, in a thread about man/boy love, I'm gonna suggest for you to NOT be so anal.

Of course technically it's an attraction to the same sex. I was speaking in conjunction with this thread. Age is irrelevant, being my point.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Ironically, in a thread about man/boy love, I'm gonna suggest for you to NOT be so anal.

Of course technically it's an attraction to the same sex. I was speaking in conjunction with this thread. Age is irrelevant, being my point.

-AC

Age being irrelevant is very much the point. Not once have I ever looked at a person who wasn't "old enough" and been attracted to him.

This entire thread is Whob's pathetic attempt to not answer the challenge posed to him in the other thread. He can prove that homosexuality occurs in other species in nature, but pedophelia does not. This entire thread is a distraction from the true question posed to him: If homosexuality and pedophilia are both corrupt, mentally defeciant behaviors, then why can homosexuality in animals be observed, but pedophilia can not?

The answer is excessively obvious . He just can't put it together. So, since homosexual behavior can be observed in animals, but pedophilia can not, then one must be natural, and the other not so much.

If pedophilia is exclusively human, and baby jesus created humaity, why does it only occur in higher order mammals?

Originally posted by Darth Jello
um, i'm aware that he's a nazi genius.

Okay..you were beginning to worry me there..I mean..how many jews do you know who can't identify a swastica...😉

What a great thead! It looks like it's gotten away from the initial subject, though. Is everybody going to get back on topic soon???? 😑

Originally posted by botankus
What a great thead! It looks like it's gotten away from the initial subject, though. Is everybody going to get back on topic soon???? 😑

No, probably won't. And, if the great Raz doesn't change his opinion this Thread won't stay open anyways...if you want to know why...Click Here

Whew! Bardock, I thought you were about to re-direct me to some child love web site.

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, probably won't. And, if the great Raz doesn't change his opinion this Thread won't stay open anyways...if you want to know why...Click Here

I wonder why he wouldn't keep it open? I mean we've had threads opened up about Pedophilia, The word Negro, and countless other controversial topics..this would be no different..

Originally posted by whobdamandog
I wonder why he wouldn't keep it open? I mean we've had threads opened up about Pedophilia, The word Negro, and countless other controversial topics..this would be no different..

Don't get it either, but well, Raz doesn't need to explain himself, it's hist Forum after all.

Originally posted by botankus
Whew! Bardock, I thought you were about to re-direct me to some child love web site.

The NAMBLA Site is kind of funny though, you can use the link provided in the closed Thread.

I guess at least Whob didn't post the actual site this time. If I remember rightly in the last thread there were some people concerned about having the cookie on their computer to a controversial, and possibly pedophile website after clicking on the link. Or something

What a great thead! It looks like it's gotten away from the initial subject, though. Is everybody going to get back on topic soon????

There was initially a subject? Get out off town! pokey

I wonder why he wouldn't keep it open? I mean we've had threads opened up about Pedophilia, The word Negro, and countless other controversial topics..this would be no different..

While I don't claim to understand the awesome workings of the mind of Raz, I suspect it might be because such threads seem to attract people who ignorantly claim things like "that's homosexuals for you" and "homosexuals are pedophiles" - at which point things can get nasty.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
There was initially a subject? Get out of town! pokey

I hope not. 😕 Regardless of whether there was or wasn't, I really don't have anything to contribute. See you all in another thread wavey when this one's closed.

paedophelia includes the attraction toward underage girls as well.
but i guess either

1-lets just blame that on homosexuals as well

or

2-just so long as its not same-sex intercourse, the fascist feckwits are happy

We all know why whobdamandog is interested in such things.

i want to start a new poll:

who would you sooner allow to babysit your kids:

1-whob

2-michael jackson

Originally posted by PVS
i want to start a new poll:

who would you sooner allow to babysit your kids:

1-whob

2-michael jackson

Why not molest/kill (not necessarily in that order) your kids yourself?

I'm pretty sure that I could physically overpower Michael Jackson (he has been unwell for a long time). I am weak and sickly myself though so couldn't defend a child so effectively 🙁

Originally posted by PVS
i want to start a new poll:

who would you sooner allow to babysit your kids:

1-whob

2-michael jackson

Tough choice.... I think I would have to flip a coin and hope it somehow exploded and killed us all.

No wait.... Michael Jackson. At least if something did happen we could sue him. Oh wait. He has no money any more. Oh well, back to the exploding coin then.

Why not molest/kill (not necessarily in that order) your kids yourself?

Oh wow, infanticide, pedophilia and necrophilia all in one post. If it contained murdering a king while selling US military secrets to the Chinese it would have almost all the most serious crimes known to man.

Originally posted by PVS
i want to start a new poll:

who would you sooner allow to babysit your kids:

1-whob

2-michael jackson


tough choice but Id say MJ. 😛

Hmm, a musical legend or an overly insecure KMC poster.

Tough one.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Hmm, a musical legend or an overly insecure KMC poster.

Tough one.

-AC

Yeah...A Musical Legend that most people assume to be a paedophile though.

Most people and what they assume often turns out to be wrong.

As would appear to be the case with MJ, barring any anal (though true) "Well we don't know what happened." crap.

-AC