NAMBLA

^ wob, this is your karma.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Can someone please answer the question above? I think PVS was alluding that he would answer "yes" to the question..but I'm not really sure...please answer these questions guys..

I answered this question.

Originally posted by BackFire
I answered this question.

and he ignored it. dont you wish you could reclaim the time you wasted answering his question? thats a moment of your life you'll never get back. 🙁

Originally posted by PVS
why bother? he's just going to dodge the blatant truth of the point.

whob is a repressed homosexual who cant deal with his inner desires.
so that inability to deal with his true self manifests itself as extreme hatred for other gay people.

think about all the time. the TIME he has spent 'debating'. and i quote that because its not really a debate in that he dodges all valid counterpoints and goes on trying to convince himself that gay=evil.

yeah i know whob, im full of shit. i dont know what im talking about. blah blah....but how monumentally depressed would you be if you really tallied up all the hours you spent on the topic? most people as well as i would call that an obsession. so the next question begged is: why the obsession?

:edit: thank you whob for proving my initial point in your last post.
far be it from you to disappoint.

Researchers at the University of Georgia conducted a study to determine the cause of homophobia. For the purposes of this study, "homophobia" was defined as "a negative emotional reaction, e.g. anxiety, discomfort, fear, etc. to homosexuality."

Of a sample of 64 men, none of whom had engaged in homosexual behavior in their lifetime and whose sexual fantasies involved only women, 35 were rated homophobic and 29 were rated non-homophobic according to the Index of Homophobia.

The men were then shown gay, lesbian, and straight adult films while a plethysmograph device measured the circumference of their penis as a gauge of sexual arousal.

The two groups exhibited similar arousal when they viewed four minute samples of the lesbian and the straight adult films, but responded differently to the sample of the gay film.

Of the non-homophobic men, 66% experienced an insignificant degree of penile tumescence, 10% experienced a moderate degree of penile tumescence, and 24% experienced a definite degree of penile tumescence.

Of the homophobic men, 20% experienced an insignificant degree of penile tumescence, 26% experienced a moderate degree of penile tumescence, and 54% experienced a definite degree of penile tumescence.

The researchers concluded that this data is consistent with the belief that homophobic men have repressed homosexual desires.

Originally posted by PVS
and he ignored it. dont you wish you could reclaim the time you wasted aswering his question?

Nah, I woulda just wasted it anyways.

😂

Originally posted by PVS
you forgot #3: the endless mission to convince himself and those around him that he is not a latant homosexual.

😆 😆

A la velga! That was f*cking funny; I'm literally wiping tears from my eyes!

Originally posted by BackFire
No, because again, he has a "proud" (apparantly) affiliation with NAMBLA, which would obviously mean that he thinks it's okay to have sex with children or that he himself has a sexual attraction to children, again, any resistance he's met with would be out of fear that he'd take advantage of children, not that he'd have sex with someone of the same sex.

okay I got it so having sex with boys..only makes you a pedophile..but it doesn't make you a homosexual..makes sense..

and raping young boys..only makes you a rapist..not a homosexual..makes sense again..

Thanks for the explanation BF..🙄

Originally posted by whobdamandog
okay I got it so having sex with boys..only makes you a pedophile..but it doesn't make you a homosexual..makes sense..

and raping young boys..only makes you a rapist..not a homosexual..makes sense again..

Thanks for the explanation BF..🙄

Yeah, because that's what I said and stuff.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
and raping young boys..only makes you a rapist..not a homosexual..makes sense again..

yes it does. straight men rape straight men in prison as per some twisted ritual of alpha male dominance. absolutely it makes sense.

twisting logic to suit your own self denial wont change the facts whob.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Researchers at the University of Georgia conducted a study to determine the cause of homophobia. For the purposes of this study, "homophobia" was defined as "a negative emotional reaction, e.g. anxiety, discomfort, fear, etc. to homosexuality."

Of a sample of 64 men, none of whom had engaged in homosexual behavior in their lifetime and whose sexual fantasies involved only women, 35 were rated homophobic and 29 were rated non-homophobic according to the Index of Homophobia.

The men were then shown gay, lesbian, and straight adult films while a plethysmograph device measured the circumference of their penis as a gauge of sexual arousal.

The two groups exhibited similar arousal when they viewed four minute samples of the lesbian and the straight adult films, but responded differently to the sample of the gay film.

Of the non-homophobic men, 66% experienced an insignificant degree of penile tumescence, 10% experienced a moderate degree of penile tumescence, and 24% experienced a definite degree of penile tumescence.

Of the homophobic men, 20% experienced an insignificant degree of penile tumescence, 26% experienced a moderate degree of penile tumescence, and 54% experienced a definite degree of penile tumescence.

The researchers concluded that this data is consistent with the belief that homophobic men have repressed homosexual desires.

Okay guys..I have another question for ya..

If you continually call someone a repressed gay..

wouldn't that by logic of the study above..make you a homophobe..and repressed gay..since you like making fun of someone who is a repressed gay?

Please enlighten me with your wisdom oh wise ones..

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Okay guys..I have another question for ya..

If you continually call someone a repressed gay..

wouldn't that by logic of the study above..make you a homophobe..and repressed gay..since you like making fun of someone who is a repressed gay?

Please enlighten me with your wisdom oh wise ones..

depends on the motive. if its just finger pointing in an attempt to expose someone as gay and then attack them for being gay, absolutley.

however if the person(s) suggesting latant homosexuality only wishes to help and encourage the supposed homosexual to accept themselves and let go of all the self hate and denial...i would call them a champion of gay acceptance. 🙂

Seems like a never ending paradox of sorts..you make fun of someone else who you think is a homophobe and is a repressed gay, then in turn..you are alluding to the fact that you are a repressed gay...and then if someone makes fun of you making fun of that person who you think is a repressed gay..that then alludes to them being a repressed gay...

So I guess when you think about it..it kind of boils down to this..

everyone is gay, and they are just repressing it a bit..

What do ya think about my theory guys..😉

Well, as South Park said - "We're all a little gay."

Whob, why do you have a picture of YOUNG Gary Coleman in your avatar? It just looks kinda suspicious, because you started a thread about pedophiles.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Seems like a never ending paradox of sorts..you make fun of someone else who you think is a homophobe and is a repressed gay, then in turn..you are alluding to the fact that you are a repressed gay...and then if someone makes fun of you making fun of that person who you think is a repressed gay..that then alludes to them being a repressed gay...

So I guess when you think about it..it kind of boils down to this..

everyone is gay, they are just repressing it a bit..

What do ya think about my theory guys..😉

not really whob. in fact i would be quite proud and respectful of you if you let go of the lies and embraced your true self. would truly make my day 🙂

Originally posted by whobdamandog
lol..uh..no. And I think you've commited a fallacy in the above Adam.

Besides..I told you already..the Dalai Lama says it is chosen..so that makes it so..😉

By all means, point out where. You have yet to identify or cite a logic fallacy correctly, so I will not hold my breath.

[list=1][*]The Dalai Lama has never stated that homosexuality is a choice.

[*]Even if we presume that he has, The Dalai Lama is an authority on Buddhism, not human sexuality.[/list]

Considering that it is your belief that in Nazi Germany, if Hitler says one is a doctor, he can suddenly pick up a scalpel and perform surgery, I do not expect you to understand that concept of authoritarianism.

🙄

Originally posted by PVS
depends on the motive. if its just finger pointing in an attempt to expose someone as gay and then attack them for being gay, absolutley.

however if the person(s) suggesting latant homosexuality only wishes to help and encourage the supposed homosexual to accept themselves and let go of all the self hate and denial...i would call them a champion of gay acceptance. 🙂

I always thought it would be the other way around..if you vigourously fight for something that you believe in..doesn't it mean that you believe in the behavior that you are fighting for..or at least a bit interested in it..

I mean...if a man defends abortion..he probably wouldn't mind if his girlfriend had one right?

So if a man defends homosexuality as being the equal of heterosexuality..wouldn't that mean that he might not mind if a man bangs him up the bunghole..or vice a versa?

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Okay guys..I have another question for ya..

If you continually call someone a repressed gay..

wouldn't that by logic of the study above..make you a homophobe..and repressed gay..since you like making fun of someone who is a repressed gay?

Please enlighten me with your wisdom oh wise ones..

I am gay, and I am the one making the accusation. This blows your theory out of the water. It is unfortunate that it does not also blow you out of the closet.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
I always thought it would be the other way around..if you vigourously fight for something that you believe in..doesn't it mean that you believe in the behavior that you are fighting for..or at least a bit interested in it..

I mean...if a man defends abortion..he probably wouldn't mind if his girlfriend had one right?

So if a man defends homosexuality as being the equal of heterosexuality..wouldn't that mean that he might not mind if a man bangs him up the bunghole..or vice a versa?

No, I defend abortion but would never want one for a girlfriend. There's a lot of people who support the notion and necessity of abortion without completely embracing it themselves.

Same goes for homosexuality. I defend it, but I would never want a man's dick in my butt. Same deal.