Originally posted by Shakyamunison
No, because of the consequences. People have their lives damaged because of this, and then it has a tenancy to be past from generation to generation. As adults we have a responsibility to care for the next generation.
Would the children be damaged if it was accepted by the society.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Damaged is subjective, it would change the culture in a way were human rights would be diminished.
What's your point.
Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
I don't think any child has an Idea of love at the age which Nambla grooms them... To Don't think a child is able to understand what is happening at that age. It is wrong plain and simple...
Well that's why Boys were introduced to sexual relationships (and much more) by an experinced man which supposedly didn't do damage to the kids.
Now, I have a confession to make, and I hope you don't think I am a pervert or anything, but I am quite fascinated with the Greek pederesty although very irritating to our modern undersandiung it was a relationship that we can't experience anymore....of course this is very different from NAMBLA, but still, it can have some positive aspects surely.
It's cultural.........And in different cultures it is perfectly ok to have sex with let say someone about 14 or 15 maybe even someone 13, but to me that is just too young....But in that culture people are geared differently of course.....In the states...I'd say NO as in Europe...just would be destructive to the mind of a child...not mature enough for it...and in other cultures it's just much much different in there thinking about sexuality and relationships and religion.
Originally posted by BackFire
No. Because you wouldn't be doing it because of the "same sex" aspect of his sexuality, but because it's children who he's reaming.
Okay..makes sense..now what if a man who wasn't a convicted pedophile, but was a homosexual who was a Proud member of NAMBLA, moved into your neighborhood. And what if he wanted to get a job at an all boys highschool? Would it be discrimination against gays not to let him have the job, particularly since the man had not been found guilty of any criminal offense? Would you be homophobic for wanting him out of your neighborhood and not wanting him to be around young boys?
Please enlighten me oh wise brother Backfire...
why bother? he's just going to dodge the blatant truth of the point.
whob is a repressed homosexual who cant deal with his inner desires.
so that inability to deal with his true self manifests itself as extreme hatred
for other gay people.
think about all the time. the TIME he has spent 'debating'. and i quote that because its not really a debate in that he dodges all valid counterpoints and goes on trying to convince himself that gay=evil.
yeah i know whob, im full of shit. i dont know what im talking about. blah blah....but how monumentally depressed would you be if you really tallied up all the hours you spent on the topic? most people as well as i would call that an obsession. so the next question begged is: why the obsession?
:edit: thank you whob for proving my initial point in your last post.
far be it from you to disappoint.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Got another question for you guys..so if a pedophile who molest's young boys moves into your neighborhood and get's a job at your local school as a janitor..if you try to get him out of the neighborhood and make him loose his job..does that then make you a homophobe?
No, but an ignorant prick
Originally posted by PVS
whob is a repressed homosexual who cant deal with his inner desires.
so that inability to deal with his true self manifests itself as extreme hatred
for other gay people.think about all the time. the TIME he has spent 'debating'. and i quote that because its not really a debate in that he dodges all valid counterpoints and goes on trying to convince himself that gay=evil.
yeah i know whob, im full of shit. i dont know what im talking about. blah blah....but how monumentally depressed would you be if you really tallied up all the hours you spent on the topic? most people as well as i would call that an obsession. so the next question begged is: why the obsession? [/B]
So is that a yes or a no to the question posed above?
Originally posted by BackFire
Gee, I wonder what the underlying agenda of starting this thread is.
Is it not obvious? whobdamandog created this thread to:
[list=1][*]Distract from his inability to refute the overwhelming evidence that homosexuality is an immutable characteristic in the "Homosexuality: Chosen or Genetic?" thread, until which time he can resume posting, selectively ignoring the body of evidence presented in the previous 183 pages.
[*]Draw a comparison between two relatively dissimilar things, e.g. homosexuality and pedophilia, in an attempt to reinforce his Christian worldview and further his social agenda.[/list]
No, because again, he has a "proud" (apparantly) affiliation with NAMBLA, which would obviously mean that he thinks it's okay to have sex with children or that he himself has a sexual attraction to children, again, any resistance he's met with would be out of fear that he'd take advantage of children, not that he'd have sex with someone of the same sex.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Okay..makes sense..now what if a man who wasn't a convicted pedophile, but was a homosexual who was a Proud member of NAMBLA, moved into your neighborhood. And what if he wanted to get a job at an all boys highschool? Would it be discrimination against gays not to let him have the job, particularly since the man had not been found guilty of any criminal offense? Would you be homophobic for wanting him out of your neighborhood and not wanting him to be around young boys?Please enlighten me oh wise brother Backfire...
Can someone please answer the question above? I think PVS was alluding that he would answer "yes" to the question..but I'm not really sure...please answer these questions guys..
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Is it not obvious? whobdamandog created this thread to:[list=1][*]Distract from his inability to refute the overwhelming evidence that homosexuality is an immutable characteristic in the "Homosexuality: Chosen or Genetic?" thread, until which time he can resume posting, selectively ignoring the body of evidence presented in the previous 183 pages.
[*]Draw a comparison between two relatively dissimilar things, e.g. homosexuality and pedophilia, in an attempt to reinforce his Christian worldview and further his social agenda.[/list]
you forgot #3: the endless mission to convince himself and those around him that he is not a latant homosexual.
Originally posted by PVS
why bother? he's just going to dodge the blatant truth of the point.whob is a repressed homosexual who cant deal with his inner desires.
so that inability to deal with his true self manifests itself as extreme hatredfor other gay people.
😆 oooooooooooo
Whob just got burned, homes!
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Is it not obvious? whobdamandog created this thread to:[list=1][*]Distract from his inability to refute the overwhelming evidence that homosexuality is an immutable characteristic in the "Homosexuality: Chosen or Genetic?" thread, until which time he can resume posting, selectively ignoring the body of evidence presented in the previous 183 pages.
[*]Draw a comparison between two relatively dissimilar things, e.g. homosexuality and pedophilia, in an attempt to reinforce his Christian worldview and further his social agenda.[/list]
lol..uh..no. And I think you've commited a fallacy in the above Adam.
Besides..I told you already..the Dalai Lama says it is chosen..so that makes it so..😉