Originally posted by Numan
tdtd is right here. You're thinking of Vodo's best feats and exxagerating them like hell. For instance where the hell are you going with how Vodo was able to duel with a wooden staff? Big deal. You have absolutely no proof that this was anything special. And you guys keep on telling tdtd to prove up when he is not arguing for Yoda or Vodo and doesn't need any proof and only needs to comment on your lack of it. You have completely ignored the extent of strength and focus that Yodacould use with the force. You are all fanboys of the ancient sith because you think it makes you original and sets you aside from the regular star wars fans. Believe me it doesn't.
Exar Kun isn't an ancient Sith. And since when do we "think this is being original"? The Ancient Sith win in most versus threads because they were either shown, demonstrated, or extrapoloated as being godlier and stronger than the rest of them. That's pretty explicit, even a casual play of KotOR will tell you that much.
We don't know much about Vodo's staff? We know that there are few materials (cortosis excluded) that resist lightsabers, and we don't know of another individual that did the same thing. Arguing against the omniscient (I suggest looking it up) narrator when he says Vodo could make his staff "more powerful than a lightsaber" is being silly and petty. Picking up things with the force? Big deal, practically every one has been shown to use telekinesis, many of them on a huge scale as well.
Lack of proof? So being the de facto leader of a martial order with more knowledge counts for nothing? You'd rather vote for someone who sits on his green ass all day with a smaller, more ineffectual Jedi Order that has 90% of them practicing the comparatively useless form of Num.. errr Niman? A jedi order that hasn't seen a sith for a millenia and wouldn't know even know what an ancient sith is? Logical deduction is valid proof in a debate. Deduction and Induction both are. It is not my problem that you lack the ability to make your own damn conclusions and like to parrot popular notions while not offering any actual proof.
So when you decide to cut it out with the psuedointellectualism and learn to one-two step in a debate, come back and talk.