Originally posted by Tshern
So without evidence you simply claim that Galactus, who can destroy the universe, is weaker than a regular Celestial? And fully-fed Galactus is on par with Death and Eternity, hence a generic Celestial is above Death and Eternity. Doesn't sound true to me.As long as you have no evidence proving that Celestials are more powerful than Galactus, you have no way to win this debate. There is evidence that confirming the fact that Galactus can destroy the universe and is approximately as strong as Death and Eternity, but nothing shows that Celestials are stronger than Galactus.
And since Tyrant fought Galactus and even stalemated him for quite a while, it can be said that he is almost as powerful as Galactus and definitely in the same league. Of course the Galactus he fought wasn't in full power. Tyrant simply overpowers your puny gods after pimpslapping them to comatose.
without evidence that galactus is on par with eternity (whom eternity addressed this issue in the infinity gauntlet series, he said LT was the only one he considered a peer. not infinity, not galactus). you have no case either. i'm just going by on panel showings. you are going on hear-say information. which seems more credible to you???
Originally posted by Tshern
Excuse me, maybe I read your posts too carelessly, but do you have any evidence of that? To me that sounds like complete BS, Galactus is a cosmic entity who indeed has an essential duty in the universe unlike the Celestials, who just run their own experiments. And since the Watcher said that Galactus can destroy the universe (even several times) and I don't see Celestials having such powers, I have to disagree with your statement until I see some evidence.Hopefully this didn't offend you, but there's a principle I tend to follow; believe the source that has more credibility. And in this case I have to lean to Marvel Comics rather than you statement. I'm sorry if I missed your pieces of evidence, but if you had any, could you please repost it/them?
i dont get it. you and another fellow keep coming in and saying i have no evidence. galactus uses worlds (single planets) to keep his life going. a celestials life was started by an entire galaxy. 1 point celestial
galactus couldnt stop ego (regardless of power). celestials threw planets like marbles . this is a double also, they destroyed the black galaxy which ego resides in. had ego been there, he would have been destroyed too. galactus cant even stop the planet, but a single celestial can end the entire galaxy??? which is billions upon billions of stars and planets... hmmm. 1/another point for celestials
galactus was repelled by odin. a single celestial haulted zues, odin, and vishnu (this is the good part) by simply raising his hand. so you are telling me that galactus was so starved he couldnt even match the celestials hand??? then you are going to tell me that by feeding, galactus would gain that much power??? 1 point celestials
marvel has put out a news letter that diretly addressed this issue. it said something along the lines of the watchers, galactus and the stranger USED to be the top tier of power houses in the marvel mu. now the celestials constitute the next level of power. and that is how they depicted them. 1 point celestials.
thor used his godforce blast several times on galactus, causing him to flee for his life. he used the same attack (only amplified, he attached his hammer to his belt of power to try and control it) on a celestial. it only gave the celestial pause. the blast was so powerful it disentigrated thors hammer. but wait, it was still present after galactus... 1 point celestial
so in review for all you math majors... 5 points for celestials, no points for galactus (unless you count alternate realities). please feel free to tear these arguements apart with your "evidence" as i know you cant. it cant be done. these are on panel showings, and each one favors the celestial. not galactus. let alone tyrant.