Ragnos runs the Gauntlet

A) It's a mighty assumption to just claim Nadd is on par with Exar Kun. There's been no primary source material written on his life, it is extremely difficult to say.

You've said it yourself, that the amulet can destroy spirits. He certainly didn't look like he was going to die without being attacked by the amulet. He did lord over a prodigious Kun, even if it wasn't a dark side one. His feats even as a spirit were mighty impressive, moreso than Kun's feats as a spirit, even though Kun's spirit did linger for much longer.

Also considering Kun did get a good portion of his knowledge from him, and that Nadd's personal accomplishments included conquering warlike Onderon and destroying the forces of its moon, it's more than reasonable to assume that he has plenty of power of his own. Can we say it is definitive? No, but we can't say with practically any of the ancient Sith. I would place him right with Kun, based on what I have seen and the logical inferences thereof.

Again, Agreed.

Mm, I'd debate Freedon's Spirit against Kun's with you, Illustrious. It seems Kun had many of the same capabilities as Nadd's except for the freedom to roam.

That, it seems, was caused by the Jedi intervention at the end of his life. When you combine that with the fact that Kun's was still able to do these things four thousand (rather than four hundred) years later, it leads me to believe that Kun is a notch better.

Originally posted by IKC
Mm, I'd debate Freedon's Spirit against Kun's with you, Illustrious. It seems Kun had many of the same capabilities as Nadd's except for the freedom to roam.

That, it seems, was caused by the Jedi intervention at the end of his life. When you combine that with the fact that Kun's was still able to do these things four thousand (rather than four hundred) years later, it leads me to believe that Kun is a notch better.

Only Nadd was beaten back by a Jedi Master a few times... Those attacks would probably have weakened him and we don't know how much he still would have been able to do 3600 years later. He never really seems to challenge himself with the things he does either...

mmm, i guess Ragnos wins, and comparing Kun and nadd is kinda hard, since we have very little knowledge on Nadd, except he could kill Jedi with a blaster and he conquered a planet, wih a short lightsaber..which does imply great power, on the other hand, Kun seems to have achieved more, as well he seems to have demonstrated greater power, details that i dont want to bother with..

oh btw, sorry for the confusion, i edited the poll as my final choice, so sorry for the confusion

DN Luke is 2nd only to Ragnos slaying them all. Sounds about right.

Simus + Naga + Kressh would be more likely to take him out than DN Luke.

ragnos would win one way or the other

Yes those 3 ancient sith lords are more likely to take him out but after all of his battles I would think DN Luke does the job.

Agreed, there's no way that Ragnos could keep fighting ALL those people consecutively. As I said, Even DN Luke could win, if he was smart about it. Ragnos would still win against Luke prolly 60% of the time, as Luke more then likley could not go completely head to head with Ragnos. So Luke would have to play it smart to win. But when you take in account Ragnos having to fight ALL those other very powerful people, and then have to take on DN Luke. Doubtful that even Ragnos could do that.

Agreed

Ok, say that Ragnos gets a day rest between each, meaning he recovers his force but not the wounds he may sustain

and surprisingly. most people think he can win...

Ragnos is hard to guess really, he was never beaten never surpassed and was more powerful then the most powerful of the most powerful. He made Sadow who had been rebelling against him obey him even when he was a spirit...

The guy was great, however to say exactly how great... Its impossible.

Thats true, but its better that it stays that way, since writing something about him, would limit his power.