FINALLY!!! Rapists can Procreate in S. Dakota

Originally posted by meep-meep
...Where's all this riighteousness when it comes to taking care of those children. Are you in those neighborhoods, helping the mothers and fathers to get jobs? Are you helping to put these kids through school so that they have a better understanding of these issues? No.
Inviting them to accept god as their savior is good enough, right?
A lot of women deal with these issues, and for anyone to say that a woman can't abort a child, as horrible as it is, when they were raped, is just sticking your nose into a life that you refuse to accept as real.

This entire post is straight pwnage, but I especially like this part here.

Kudos to meep-meep

Originally posted by Arachnoidfreak
This entire post is straight pwnage, but I especially like this part here.

Kudos to meep-meep

I do not think that it means what you think it means.

Why are these people allowed to be law makers, or in any position of power, when they haven't got any brains in their heads.

Rape is an act of violence, not passion. If a woman who is raped does not want to keep the child, because of an ''act of violence'' placed upon her, making her do so is cruel and extreamly backward.

This is too stupid - even for some Southern States in America.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness

Rape is an act of violence, not passion. If a woman who is raped does not want to keep the child, because of an ''act of violence'' placed upon her, making her do so is cruel and extreamly backward.

As well as being an oversimplistic generalisation, I'm not sure what the relevance of the motive behind the rape is here. It's not as if it would be more of a forgiving law if the man raped her for sexual purposes only.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
As well as being an oversimplistic generalisation, I'm not sure what the relevance of the motive behind the rape is here. It's not as if it would be more of a forgiving law if the man raped her for sexual purposes only.

Oversimplistic?
Rape is an act of violence - there is nothing simplistic about it.
Whether his motives were passionate or not was never my point nor have I commented upon it - act itself is violent - as my post stated above.

And it is relevant. If someone makes a woman keep a child which she obtained while she was raped, then they must certainly have different view of rape. If they saw it as an act of violence im sure raped woman would have more options in abortion.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Oversimplistic?
Rape is an act of violence - there is nothing simplistic about it.
Whether his motives were passionate or not was never my point nor have I commented upon it - act itself is violent - as my post stated above.

And it is relevant. If someone makes a woman keep a child which she obtained while she was raped, then they must certainly have different view of rape. If they saw it as an act of violence im sure raped woman would have more options in abortion.

Well, I think the Law is more about Abortion than about Rape.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Oversimplistic?
Rape is an act of violence - there is nothing simplistic about it.

Of course that is a simplistic interpretation. Rape is an absence of consent, so in many cases violence need not be involved. It's just one of those canards that people like to repeat.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness

Whether his motives were passionate or not was never my point nor have I commented upon it - act itself is violent - as my post stated above.

Sorry, I misread the word 'passion'. I thought it said... 'passion'.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness

And it is relevant. If someone makes a woman keep a child which she obtained while she was raped, then they must certainly have different view of rape. If they saw it as an act of violence im sure raped woman would have more options in abortion.

Not at all, it's simply the extreme extrapolation of the pro-life argument. It's not a commentary on the nature of rape.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, I think the Law is more about Abortion than about Rape.

✅

I suppose If they banned all abortions cept for rape ones, How many women would lie and say it was a rape child just to get an abortion?? Seeing as there seems to be a growing trend in the amount of women who shout rape as a form of payback... It wouldn't surprise me if you saw the amount of "Rapes" double to compensate for lack of the "1 night stand" abortions...

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
I suppose If they banned all abortions cept for rape ones, How many women would lie and say it was a rape child just to get an abortion?? Seeing as there seems to be a growing trend in the amount of women who shout rape as a form of payback... It wouldn't surprise me if you saw the amount of "Rapes" double to compensate for lack of the "1 night stand" abortions...

Well imagine if you had to get a conviction before you could have the abortion. Craziness would ensue.

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
I suppose If they banned all abortions cept for rape ones, How many women would lie and say it was a rape child just to get an abortion?? Seeing as there seems to be a growing trend in the amount of women who shout rape as a form of payback... It wouldn't surprise me if you saw the amount of "Rapes" double to compensate for lack of the "1 night stand" abortions...

^ Exactly. B!tches would be lyin' left and right!---"He raped me!" "I was raped!" "I was taked advantage of!" etc......... blah blah blah...........just to get an abortion cuz the ho couldn't keep her legs closed.

You genuinely have despicable rationale on this issue, Bullets.

I mean sure, that happens, but you don't think any rape victim should be allowed to abort her baby do you?

-AC

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Well imagine if you had to get a conviction before you could have the abortion. Craziness would ensue.

I'm not saying its easier if they did or didn't, I'm just thinking practically what would happen??

And with all the people out there who Love to abuse Loop-holes in the law, I think this is what would happen...

I think its a case where its all or nothing... Either Allow abortions to all.. Or to none...

Personally I'm for allowing Abortions... But I think the time allowed should be tightened.. though I would have to read up on when I would like it though... Also I think the father should Have a bit more of a say in the matter...

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
I'm not saying its easier if they did or didn't, I'm just thinking practically what would happen??

I was just extrapolating on the idea you suggested.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You genuinely have despicable rationale on this issue, Bullets.

I mean sure, that happens, but you don't think any rape victim should be allowed to abort her baby do you?

-AC

No Centauri, I don't. You said it yourself it "happens". Hit and Miss didn't miss this time---he's right on the money. Abortions will skyrocket because women would be lyin', sayin' that some foo' raped them. Watch, it'll happen.

Why is my rationale despicable? Cuz Alpha Centauri doesn't agree?

No, your rationale is despicable because you believe women who are pregnant from rape should keep the "babies" based on "It's not the baby's fault she got porked against her will".

That's why it's despicable. It's not the baby's fault she got raped? It's not her fault she got raped either, so why should she say "Oh well, pregnant now, might as well have it. Isn't the foetuses fault"?

She is keeping that thing alive, SHE is allowing the offspring of a rapist to grow inside her, so she has every right to get rid of it if she wants to.

How you can even suggest what you are suggesting is downright pathetic and disgusting. People call me immoral, yet you've managed to slip under the radar. Insane.

-AC

Killing the child won't solve anything. It won't punish the rapist, nor will it allow you to go back in time to prevent the rape. It won't solve anything positive.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
I was just extrapolating on the idea you suggested.

I suppose they would have to supply some form of proof that there was an incident... Like DNA of the rapist... I suspect that the police would be able to tell a fake rape from a real one, But it would waste alot of time...

Originally posted by DiamondBullets
Killing the child won't solve anything. It won't punish the rapist, nor will it allow you to go back in time to prevent the rape. It won't solve anything positive.

Unless your name is Mary mother of god (and thus have the patience of a saint), I think your going to always see the horrible crime in the face of that child.. Most women will be unable to forget and will cause them to lapse back and forth between hate/loving the kid... This is not a good position for the child...

Originally posted by DiamondBullets
No Centauri, I don't. You said it yourself it "happens". Hit and Miss didn't miss this time---he's right on the money. Abortions will skyrocket because women would be lyin', sayin' that some foo' raped them. Watch, it'll happen.

Why is my rationale despicable? Cuz Alpha Centauri doesn't agree?

I'm sure they would require some evidence and not just take them, or reject them by their word.

I have spoken to a few people about this, and I am amazed by their attitude at this. They claim that the woman should have an abortion if she is raped, then she wouldn't have to worry about the rapists claiming parental rights. So, we punish women for making a choice she is entitled to? 😠