impeachment

Started by PVS3 pages
Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
I just wish we were in the year 2008 so that we can finally have some peace...not from Bush but from his haters.

the worst i could do is annoy you.
the worst he could do is be reckless and incompitent...then many people die. oh wait thats been done, as im sure of the first part.

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
I just wish we were in the year 2008 so that we can finally have some peace...not from Bush but from his haters.

👆 ✅

Originally posted by Darth Jello
So as i've made obvious in the past few months, I am a steadfast supporter for the immediate impeachment of George W. Bush. I've decided to list the charges against him and his administration as proposed by Ramsey Clarke with a few added myself and was wondering if anyone agrees with these:

* Fabrication of evidence regarding Iraq's threat to the United States in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, specifically, that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction;
* Violation of various sections of the United States Constitution and Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
* Committing crimes relating to "bribery and coercion of individuals and governments;"
* Concealing "information vital to public discussion and informed judgment;"
* Being responsible for assassinations, torture, and indefinite detentions such as the Camp X-Ray, Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse, Bagram torture and prisoner abuse, desecration of the Qur'an at Guantánamo Bay and other such matters including the persecution of U.S. and non-U.S. Muslims.
* Violating the First Amendment to the United States Constitution on numerous occasions by taking prohibitive measures on protests and marches by citizens of the United States.
*Violation of the posse commitatus statute in the form of using US military power against US civilians and conducting psyops against the citizens of the United States
*Using banned chemical weapons in warfare
*Conspiracy to subvert the legislative and judicial branch
*Conspiracy to arrest, detain, or murder dissedent civilians and journalists
*Willful failure to prevent an attack on the United States
*Conspiring and trading with enemies of the United States
*Conspiracy to violate the fourth ammendment through TIA (which still exists within the NSA)
*Conspiracy to initiate martial law under false pretense
*Willfull sabotage of intelligence programs designed to maintain the security of the United States (vallerie plame, Jeff Gannon)
*Bribery and profiteering in time of war
*Willfull and reckless endangerment of the United States military
*Obstruction of Justice

Originally posted by a1hsauce
So screwin your interns not okay, yet screwin the nation is 😕
Originally posted by PVS
...but he didnt get a blowjob from his intern, so there is no case i'm afraid.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
A process like impeachment should not be treated so frivolously.

How do you judge what is frivolous and what is not in light of the previous grounds used for a proposed impeachment? Law cases are defined by previous judgements, so impeachment cases should not?

Re: impeachment

Originally posted by Darth Jello
So as i've made obvious in the past few months, I am a steadfast supporter for the immediate impeachment of George W. Bush. I've decided to list the charges against him and his administration as proposed by Ramsey Clarke with a few added myself and was wondering if anyone agrees with these:

* Fabrication of evidence regarding Iraq's threat to the United States in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, specifically, that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction;
* Violation of various sections of the United States Constitution and Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
* Committing crimes relating to "bribery and coercion of individuals and governments;"
* Concealing "information vital to public discussion and informed judgment;"
* Being responsible for assassinations, torture, and indefinite detentions such as the Camp X-Ray, Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse, Bagram torture and prisoner abuse, desecration of the Qur'an at Guantánamo Bay and other such matters including the persecution of U.S. and non-U.S. Muslims.
* Violating the First Amendment to the United States Constitution on numerous occasions by taking prohibitive measures on protests and marches by citizens of the United States.
*Violation of the posse commitatus statute in the form of using US military power against US civilians and conducting psyops against the citizens of the United States
*Using banned chemical weapons in warfare
*Conspiracy to subvert the legislative and judicial branch
*Conspiracy to arrest, detain, or murder dissedent civilians and journalists
*Willful failure to prevent an attack on the United States
*Conspiring and trading with enemies of the United States
*Conspiracy to violate the fourth ammendment through TIA (which still exists within the NSA)
*Conspiracy to initiate martial law under false pretense
*Willfull sabotage of intelligence programs designed to maintain the security of the United States (vallerie plame, Jeff Gannon)
*Bribery and profiteering in time of war
*Willfull and reckless endangerment of the United States military
*Obstruction of Justice

Thats all hearsay! You can print all that out, and stick it!

GO DUBYA!!!!!

YEAH!!!! STICK IT!!!! USA!!!!! USA!!!!!! USA!!!!!!!! *masturbates*

as an alternative, i would be open to no impeachmet and just setting them all free...in siberia

Originally posted by PVS
YEAH!!!! STICK IT!!!! USA!!!!! USA!!!!!! USA!!!!!!!! *masturbates*

Someone's masturbating? *joins in, furiously*

the problem is that impeachment in a US court would involve US law

so anything pertaining to events actually an iraq and guantanamo surely wouldn't be prosecutable and something other than impeachment would be neccessary

as for things such as "Willful failure to prevent an attack on the United States"

this is just plain idiocy...no matter how much Deano would say other wise

impeachment is the tip of the iceburg. after their removal office, the president and the cabinet can still face charges from any court.

Originally posted by jaden101
the problem is that impeachment in a US court would involve US law

Damn! I thought someone starting a KMC thread would be enough reason to do it.

Originally posted by botankus
Damn! I thought someone starting a KMC thread would be enough reason to do it.

thats the power we have... 😈 😈 😈

The problem I see with impeachment is that then we get Dick Chaney as President.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
The problem I see with impeachment is that then we get Dick Chaney as President.

um...NO

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
I just wish we were in the year 2008 so that we can finally have some peace...not from Bush but from his haters.

😂

by haters do you mean people who like democracy and don't want to be ruled by a dumb little mussollini with an abraham lincoln complex?

Originally posted by Darth Jello
by haters do you mean people who like democracy and don't want to be ruled by a dumb little mussollini with an abraham lincoln complex?

I don't think that's what WD meant.

I think what he meant was exactly what you said word for word, with the words, "but feel the obligation to scream bloody murder about it 24/7 to people who could give two shits about what you're trying to say in the first place" added to it.

ignorance is complacency, if you get screwed, you have no one to blame but yourself.

Originally posted by Darth Jello
by haters do you mean people who like democracy and don't want to be ruled by a dumb little mussollini with an abraham lincoln complex?

Abraham Lincoln complex? Sorry for my ignorance, but I've never heard that before.

Re: impeachment

Originally posted by Darth Jello
* Fabrication of evidence regarding Iraq's threat to the United States in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, specifically, that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction

I agree. Bush said Iraq had them, and they didn't. I think Bush knew this all along.

Originally posted by Darth Jello
* Being responsible for assassinations, torture, and indefinite detentions such as the Camp X-Ray, Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse, Bagram torture and prisoner abuse, desecration of the Qur'an at Guantánamo Bay and other such matters including the persecution of U.S. and non-U.S. Muslims.

I agree again. Abuse was going on right in front of him but he turned a blind eye.

Originally posted by Darth Jello
*Using banned chemical weapons in warfare

If these chemicals are banned, and allowed them to be used, he broke the law.

Originally posted by Darth Jello
*Willful failure to prevent an attack on the United States

I believe an attack on the WTC could have been prevented.

I am of the opinion that Bush knew there would be terror attack, and he knew it would involved the WTC, and he let it happen, to gain leverage needed to go to war with Iraq.

Charge the Prez with war crimes, I say!

bush and his cronies have constantly compared him, his presidencey and his circumventing of civil liberties to abraham lincoln.