"Brokeback Mountain"- How its effected America.

Started by hellodere46 pages
Originally posted by Bardock42
Was a really Saturday here...but well..whob is the definition of the word pathetic, so whatever.

Quite frankly you're pathetic Bardock. As is PVS, Lana, Captain Fantastic, and all the others who profess these so called "tolerant" views on these forums. You all consistently "troll", say many offensive things to others during debates, and usually have a groupthink, gangbang mentality when anyone posts opinions that don't coincide with your own in these forums. This debate is a classic example of this type of behavior.

The ironic thing is when someone else uses the exact same strategy as you do during a debate, whether it be thru socking, trolling, whatever, you all automatically hit the report button, and request for that individual to be banned.

I've had many individuals create sock accounts which were meant to ridicule me over the past several weeks, hell lord xyz and blue nocturne spent 30 pages socking me in the "Intelligent Design thread", which Captain Fantastic participated in. I didn't see any of those individuals get banned.

The problem is not with me, it's with the fact the you all are hypocritical self indulgent pricks, who like to dish it out, but unfortunately can't take it back.

The truth is that you all are a bunch of prepubescent twats, who probably weren't beaten enough as children and think somehow that the world revolves around you and your foolish perverse opinions.

Sad to say, twats like you will be in real authoratative positions someday. Ohh how I dread the fate of the world during those days.

-whob

Don't worry my friends and fans..I'll be back under another alias...the mod's here unfortunately don't know how to run a secure web site..😉

Sad to say, twats like you will be in real authoratative positions someday. Ohh how I dread the fate of the world during those days.

-whob

Don't worry, twats like me will also be in authorative postitions one day. 😛

Originally posted by hellodere
Quite frankly you're pathetic Bardock. As is PVS, Lana, Captain Fantastic, and all the others who profess these so called "tolerant" views on these forums.

you're crying arent you? 😂

Yes, damn others. I am not interseted in fighting with others. Thers no point, Others disagree with the right of self-exenstince. Other do not. So be it.

Originally posted by hellodere
Quite frankly you're pathetic Bardock. As is PVS, Lana, Captain Fantastic, and all the others who profess these so called "tolerant" views on these forums. You all consistently "troll", say many offensive things to others during debates, and usually have a groupthink, gangbang mentality when anyone posts opinions that don't coincide with your own in these forums. This debate is a classic example of this type of behavior.

They say offensive things? Have you *actually* had even a teeny, weeny glance at the track records of those you are seeking to protect? The kinds of things they say? The *actual* trolling they do?

Hell, what am I saying - look at any numbers of your own posts, and you'll see posts that really should be gotten down to forensics quick fast before being burnt so innocent people aren't harmed by the toxicity of them.

The truth is that you all are a bunch of prepubescent twats, who probably weren't beaten enough as children and think somehow that the world revolves around you and your foolish perverse opinions.

Sad to say, twats like you will be in real authoratative positions someday. Ohh how I dread the fate of the world during those days.

-whob

Ooooo. I can see there how you have taken the high road and are not doing what you just accused others of. Sargent! Get this down to forensics!

Don't worry my friends and fans..I'll be back under another alias...the mod's here unfortunately don't know how to run a secure web site..

Good for you. And maybe, so as not to incriminate yourself you'll assume a different persona - oh, I don't know, like someone who is even slightly intelligent and with at least a teeny, weeny bit of maturity?

Originally posted by hellodere
Quite frankly you're pathetic Bardock.

-whob

Well, lets just look at that for a second....you created a sock account with opposing views to yours to win an argument against him and to ridicule our views...I am almost certain if I look "pathetic" up on dictionary.com they will have this as definition and a nice big pic of yourself right next to it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, lets just look at that for a second....you created a sock account with opposing views to yours to win an argument against him and to ridicule our views...I am almost certain if I look "pathetic" up on dictionary.com they will have this as definition and a nice big pic of yourself right next to it.

Ah, so that's what he did. I wonder he if plays chess by himself so that he can win as well....

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
Ah, so that's what he did. I wonder he if plays chess by himself so that he can win as well....

I do that sometimes.....but I don't tell anyone about it......oh.

There's a good book by Stefan Zweig about that, called "The Royal Game"....if someone is interested in reading good German (yeah, I know he was Austrian.....so was Hitler) Literature, I'd recommend that book.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
No, that often happens to me and other Christians on these forums when.....

Dammit Whob!

I was actually getting hopefull there for a sec.

(to be fair, I thought TehSmartGuy was a sock for Capt. Fantastic, but I guess it was more of a parody.)


Yeah I mean since teh smart guy was gay it had to be capt right?

Originally posted by hellodere
Quite frankly you're pathetic Bardock. As is PVS, Lana, Captain Fantastic, and all the others who profess these so called "tolerant" views on these forums. You all consistently "troll", say many offensive things to others during debates, and usually have a groupthink, gangbang mentality when anyone posts opinions that don't coincide with your own in these forums. This debate is a classic example of this type of behavior.

The ironic thing is when someone else uses the exact same strategy as you do during a debate, whether it be thru socking, trolling, whatever, you all automatically hit the report button, and request for that individual to be banned.

I've had many individuals create sock accounts which were meant to ridicule me over the past several weeks, hell lord xyz and blue nocturne spent 30 pages socking me in the "Intelligent Design thread", which Captain Fantastic participated in. I didn't see any of those individuals get banned.

The problem is not with me, it's with the fact the you all are hypocritical self indulgent pricks, who like to dish it out, but unfortunately can't take it back.

The truth is that you all are a bunch of prepubescent twats, who probably weren't beaten enough as children and think somehow that the world revolves around you and your foolish perverse opinions.

Sad to say, twats like you will be in real authoratative positions someday. Ohh how I dread the fate of the world during those days.

-whob

There is some truth in what you say. The sad thing is that as this forum gradually purges itself of members of your ilk, the debates do become more and more boring. Some threads have begun to resemble nice little butt-stroking tea parties.

I found many of your views regarding homosexuality and 'Intelligent Design' - ironic label of the decade award - reprehensible, but I don't think you should be banned for them. Censorship should only be applied by one's self. If someone continues to post offensively, the community as a whole would most likely marginalise that particular member, without a need for accounts being restricted. If the community didn't do this, then it's most likely that those views have become acceptable, therefore there would be no reason for placing a restriction.

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
There is some truth in what you say. The sad thing is that as this forum gradually purges itself of members of your ilk, the debates do become more and more boring. Some threads have begun to resemble nice little butt-stroking tea parties.

I found many of your views regarding homosexuality and 'Intelligent Design' - ironic label of the decade award - reprehensible, but I don't think you should be banned for them. Censorship should only be applied by one's self. If someone continues to post offensively, the community as a whole would most likely marginalise that particular member, without a need for accounts being restricted. If the community didn't do this, then it's most likely that those views have become acceptable, therefore there would be no reason for placing a restriction.

I am rather positive he wasn't banned for his views but for creating sock accounts....

Yeah, but it's boring when people get banned.

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
I found many of your views regarding homosexuality and 'Intelligent Design' - ironic label of the decade award - reprehensible, but I don't think you should be banned for them. Censorship should only be applied by one's self. If someone continues to post offensively, the community as a whole would most likely marginalise that particular member, without a need for accounts being restricted. If the community didn't do this, then it's most likely that those views have become acceptable, therefore there would be no reason for placing a restriction.

A good point, though I think Whob had been marginalised for a long, long time. The more marginal he became, the louder he proclaimed victory, and the more insulting and irrational his arguments became, and the more personal. I, for one, am surprised some times that he lasted so long (under that name at least), it seems like he was given adequate chance to rectify his behaviour and debate in something of a more civilised manner, such as not scoring points off a fall guy (fall sock?)

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Yeah, but it's boring when people get banned.

Yeah....like poor Ou Be Low hoo back in the day.

That's true, but I'm just worried the only entertainment we will have left is watching Bardock have his way with baby fishes...What am I talking about? That's good enough for me! Let it commence...

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah....like poor Ou Be Low hoo back in the day.

I never met him, but he sounds f*cking cool, handsome, charming, intelligent and witty. Probably smells nice, too. Girls adore him.

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
I never met him, but he sounds f*cking cool, handsome, charming, intelligent and witty. Probably smells nice, too. Girls adore him.

That's what the Legend tells us....

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
That's true, but I'm just worried the only entertainment we will have left is watching Bardock have his way with baby fishes...What am I talking about? That's good enough for me! Let it commence...

Brokeback Fishpond?

Originally posted by Bardock42
That's what the Legend tells us....

Did he burn out like a candle in the wind?